Use when the empirical/analytical approach is the bottleneck for a Marketing Science manuscript — choosing among structural econometrics, analytical modeling, and model-disciplined causal/ML methods, and making the model estimable and identified. Designs the approach; it does not execute the estimation and counterfactuals (mksc-data-analysis).
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-methods --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mksc Methods?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-mksc-methods)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mksc-methods
description: Use when the empirical/analytical approach is the bottleneck for a Marketing Science manuscript — choosing among structural econometrics, analytical modeling, and model-disciplined causal/ML methods, and making the model estimable and identified. Designs the approach; it does not execute the estimation and counterfactuals (mksc-data-analysis).
---
# Methods & Identification (mksc-methods)
## When to trigger
- You must choose between a structural, analytical, or reduced-form/causal-ML approach
- The model is written but not yet estimable (parameters, moments, normalization)
- Identification is hand-waved ("we use instruments") without specifics
- A reviewer says "the design cannot identify the structural parameters"
## Choose the genre that fits the claim
Marketing Science is methodologically plural around a modeling core: structural econometrics, analytical models, econometric/statistical analysis, ML tools, surveys, and experiments — all judged by whether they develop, test, or rigorously apply a formal model.
| Claim / goal | Approach that earns it |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Quantify demand and simulate a policy | Structural demand (BLP/mixed logit), supply FOCs, counterfactual |
| Forward-looking behavior, adoption, churn | Dynamic discrete choice / dynamic games (Rust, BBL, CCP) |
| Strategic-interaction insight, comparative statics | Analytical (game-theoretic) model |
| Bidding, sponsored search, marketplaces | Auction/structural-IO model with equilibrium bidding |
| Heterogeneous treatment effects tied to a model| Causal ML (double/debiased ML, causal forests) disciplined by theory |
| Causal effect from field variation | Field experiment / quasi-experiment as identifying variation |
A field experiment or quasi-experiment is welcome **when it identifies a model primitive or validates a mechanism**, not as a stand-alone reduced-form result.
## Make the model estimable and identified
- **Estimator**: match it to the model — GMM (BLP moment conditions), MLE/SMLE, simulated method of moments, or hierarchical Bayes (MCMC) for rich heterogeneity.
- **Instruments / identifying variation**: name them concretely (cost shifters, BLP/Hausman/differentiation instruments, exclusion restrictions, randomized or discontinuity variation) and defend exogeneity.
- **Normalizations and functional form**: state outside-good normalization, scale/location normalizations, and which assumptions are substantive vs. convenience.
- **Computation**: specify the solver, equilibrium/inner-loop fixed point, starting values, and how you handle multiple equilibria or local optima.
## For analytical papers
Specify the equilibrium concept, solve it, and prove the claims; relegate long proofs to an appendix but state the key steps. Plan to validate counterintuitive predictions and discuss robustness to the modeling assumptions that drive them.
## Checklist
- [ ] Genre (structural / analytical / causal-ML / experiment) matches the claim
- [ ] Estimator matches the model (GMM/MLE/SMM/Bayes) and is stated
- [ ] Identifying variation/instruments named and exogeneity defended
- [ ] Normalizations and substantive vs. convenience assumptions separated
- [ ] Computation (solver, fixed point, starting values, multiple equilibria) planned
- [ ] Any experiment/quasi-experiment tied to a model primitive, not free-standing
## Anti-patterns
- A structural model "estimated" with no stated moments or instruments.
- Reduced-form regressions presented as the whole contribution at MKSC.
- Ignoring multiplicity of equilibria or optimizer convergence.
- Treating convenience assumptions as if they were innocuous.
## Output format
```
【Genre】structural / analytical / causal-ML / experiment
【Model→estimator】GMM / MLE-SMLE / SMM / hierarchical Bayes
【Identification】instruments/variation → parameters; exogeneity defense
【Normalizations/assumptions】substantive vs. convenience
【Computation】solver, fixed point, starting values, multiplicity
【Next step】mksc-data-analysis
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!