Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Misq Topic Selection

ASecurity

Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for MIS Quarterly — confirming it is a genuine information-systems question, naming which of the four IS traditions (behavioral, design science, economics, organizational) it lives in, and choosing the matching manuscript category before any data are collected or any artifact is built.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgotestinggitapi

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill misq-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Misq Topic Selection?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Misq Topic Selection
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-misq-topic-selection/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-misq-topic-selection)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: misq-topic-selection
description: Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for MIS Quarterly — confirming it is a genuine information-systems question, naming which of the four IS traditions (behavioral, design science, economics, organizational) it lives in, and choosing the matching manuscript category before any data are collected or any artifact is built.
---

# Topic Selection & Genre Fit (misq-topic-selection)

## When to trigger

- The idea is interesting but you are not sure it is an *IS* question versus a generic management, marketing, or CS question
- You have a dataset, a platform, or a model and need a question worth a MISQ slot
- You cannot yet say which tradition the paper belongs to, or which submission category fits
- A colleague says "this could go to MISQ" and you need a fit test before committing months of work

## Is it an information-systems question?

MISQ publishes research on the development, use, impact, management, and economics of information technology — IT-based services, the management of IT resources, and the use and impact of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications. The IT artifact (a system, algorithm, platform, data, or digitally enabled practice) should be **central**, not incidental. If the technology could be swapped for "any treatment" without changing the theory, the paper is probably not an IS paper.

## Name the tradition — it decides everything downstream

| Tradition | The paper's job | Typical category |
|-----------|-----------------|------------------|
| **Behavioral** | Explain/predict how people and organizations adopt, use, and are affected by IT | Research Article / Research Notes |
| **Design science** | Build and rigorously evaluate a novel, purposeful IT artifact that solves a real problem | Design Science |
| **Economics of IS** | Identify the causal economic effects/mechanisms of IT (markets, platforms, productivity, pricing) | Research Article / Research Notes |
| **Organizational** | Theorize IT in organizational and social context (governance, transformation, work) | Research Article / Theory Development |

MISQ explicitly welcomes **cross-tradition blends** (e.g., a design-science artifact evaluated with a behavioral experiment, or an economics-of-IS question with organizational theory). Name the primary tradition, then declare the blend.

## Choose the matching manuscript category

Self-select the genre up front, because length and evaluation criteria differ:
- **Research Article** — primary empirical category (50 pp).
- **Research Notes** — focused contribution, roughly half a Research Article.
- **Theory Development** — a substantive new theory (55 pp).
- **Theory-Generative Research Synthesis** — synthesis that generates theory (65 pp).
- **Issues and Opinions** and **Design Science** — verify exact limits at misq.umn.edu/categories-lengths (待核实 for some).

Page limits count **everything** (text, tables, figures, references, appendices), so the category constrains the scope of the question.

## Fit test (answer all)

- [ ] Is the IT artifact central to the theory, not interchangeable?
- [ ] Which single tradition is primary, and what (if any) is the blend?
- [ ] Which category fits — and does the question's scope fit that page budget?
- [ ] What does an IS reader learn that they could not get from a top management, marketing, or CS venue?

## Anti-patterns

- A management/marketing study with IT as window dressing → wrong venue.
- A CS systems paper with no theory or no behavioral/economic/organizational evaluation → wrong venue (consider the Design Science track only if you build *and evaluate*).
- Picking a category after writing, then having an over-length manuscript returned.

## Output format

```
【IS question?】central IT artifact: yes/no — why
【Tradition】behavioral / design science / economics / organizational (+ blend)
【Category】Research Article / Research Notes / Theory Dev / Synthesis / Design Science / I&O
【Scope fits page budget?】yes / trim needed
【Next step】misq-theory-development
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →