Use when responding to a Mathematical Finance revise-and-resubmit, especially comments about theorem novelty, proof gaps, assumptions, exposition, numerical support, or financial-modelling relevance.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mathfin-rebuttal --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mathfin Rebuttal?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-mathfin-rebuttal)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mathfin-rebuttal
description: Use when responding to a Mathematical Finance revise-and-resubmit, especially comments about theorem novelty, proof gaps, assumptions, exposition, numerical support, or financial-modelling relevance.
---
# R&R Rebuttal (mathfin-rebuttal)
## When to trigger
- A revision decision arrives from *Mathematical Finance*
- Referees identify proof gaps, unclear assumptions, missing novelty, or weak financial interpretation
- You need a point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits
## Triage categories
1. **Proof correctness**: missing lemma, invalid theorem application, local/true
martingale issue, integrability, measurability, boundary condition.
2. **Assumption scope**: too strong, too weak, unstated, or not financially interpretable.
3. **Novelty**: overlap with prior theorem, special-case concern, missing citation.
4. **Financial modelling relevance**: theorem correct but payoff unclear.
5. **Exposition**: notation, definitions, appendix navigation, numerical explanation.
## Response strategy
- Fix proof gaps directly; do not argue around them.
- When an assumption cannot be relaxed, explain why it is necessary and what it
means financially.
- If novelty is questioned, compare theorem-by-theorem with the closest prior work.
- Add financial interpretation after formal statements, not only in the introduction.
- Move long derivations to appendices and point referees to exact page/line numbers.
## Response paragraph pattern
```text
We thank the referee for identifying this issue. We have revised [theorem/lemma/
assumption] on page X and added [proof/detail] in Appendix Y. The revised argument
now verifies [condition], which is required for [external theorem/result]. We also
added a paragraph explaining the financial interpretation of this assumption.
```
## Output format
```text
[Decision type] major / minor
[Core mathematical issues] ...
[New proof work] ...
[Novelty clarification] ...
[Financial interpretation added] ...
[Next step] revise manuscript + response letter
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!