Use when targeting Journal of Development Economics (JDE) or deciding whether a development-economics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill journal-of-development-economics --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Journal Of Development Economics?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-journal-of-development-economics)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: journal-of-development-economics
description: Use when targeting Journal of Development Economics (JDE) or deciding whether a development-economics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
---
# Journal of Development Economics (journal-of-development-economics)
## Journal positioning
The Journal of Development Economics (JDE) is the field flagship for development economics, publishing the most consequential micro-development work and the growth-and-institutions questions of low- and middle-income economies. The paper that wins here pairs a first-order development question with credible identification — an RCT, a natural experiment, or a structural model — in a low/middle-income setting, and draws a lesson that travels beyond the one context. The readership is development economists who care about poverty, growth, and policy in the developing world.
This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the publisher's own site or submission system.
## When to trigger
- The author names JDE (or a top development outlet) as the target venue.
- A paper studies a development question in a low/middle-income setting and the author is choosing among development and applied-micro venues.
- An applied-micro or field-experiment paper needs re-framing so the development mechanism and external lesson, not the single-site result, is the contribution.
- The author needs JDE's desk-reject risks and a credible development / applied-micro alternative list before submitting.
## Scope & topic fit
- Micro-development: RCTs and quasi-experiments on health, education, credit, agriculture, firms, labor, and social programs in developing economies.
- Poverty, inequality, and the economic lives of the poor; risk, insurance, and informal institutions.
- Growth, structural transformation, and institutions in low/middle-income settings when framed for a development audience.
- Political economy, conflict, migration, and governance in developing contexts.
## Method & evidence bar
- Credible identification is the desk filter: well-designed RCTs (with attention to power, attrition, spillovers, and pre-analysis plans), natural experiments, RDD, IV with a defensible exclusion, or modern DiD estimators.
- Naive TWFE on staggered rollout, weak instruments, and unaddressed selection/attrition are treated as fatal; inference (including multiple-hypothesis adjustment for many outcomes) must match current standards.
- A single-site RCT needs a mechanism and an argument for what it teaches beyond that site; structural development work needs identified parameters and a transparent mechanism.
- Data quality, sampling, and measurement in field settings are scrutinized; ethics and consent for field work are expected.
## Structure & house style
- The introduction states the development question, the design/identification, the mechanism, the headline magnitude, and the external lesson, and says why it matters for development.
- Make the contribution explicit against the closest development work; "first to run X intervention in country Y" is not enough — name the conceptual or policy advance.
- The journal uses an unstructured abstract and JEL codes; an online appendix carries the pre-analysis plan link, robustness, balance/attrition tables, and data construction.
- Exhibits report economic magnitudes, treatment effects with proper inference, and mechanism evidence; the central result should be legible from one table or figure.
## Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and `../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked.
- Search the live site for "Journal of Development Economics guide for authors / submission guidelines" and follow the current Elsevier version, not a third-party broker's copy.
- Re-check formatting, abstract/JEL codes, reference style, the online-appendix policy, the data & code / replication availability requirements, and any registered-report route.
- Re-check the current pre-registration / pre-analysis-plan and trial-registry expectations, ethics/IRB disclosure, and the replication-package requirement on the editorial system.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
## Pre-submission self-check
- [ ] One sentence stating why a development economist should change their view, and what this teaches beyond the study site.
- [ ] The contribution is stated as identification / mechanism / external lesson, not as a significant treatment effect alone.
- [ ] The introduction positions the paper against the current micro-development / growth-and-institutions frontier.
- [ ] Identification is credible; RCT/quasi-experimental choices, attrition, spillovers, and multiple-testing are handled to current standards.
- [ ] Pre-analysis plan, ethics/IRB, data, and the replication package are documented and ready.
## Common desk-reject triggers
- A single-site RCT with a significant effect but no mechanism and no argument for external relevance.
- Identification the field no longer accepts (naive TWFE on staggered rollout, weak IV, unaddressed attrition/selection).
- Many outcomes mined for significance without pre-registration or multiple-testing discipline.
- A descriptive paper about a developing country with no credible identification or development lesson.
## Re-routing decision
- General-interest development at top-5 ambition → `american-economic-review` or `aej-applied-economics`.
- Long-run growth, deep roots, and cross-country development → `journal-of-economic-growth`.
- Labor outcomes in developing settings without a development core → `journal-of-labor-economics`; public programs/taxation → `journal-of-public-economics`.
- Broad development practice and policy → `world-development`; health interventions → `journal-of-health-economics`.
## Output format
```text
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Journal of Development Economics
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <does the identification + external lesson clear this venue's bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <submission system / JEL / pre-analysis plan / ethics / replication>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!