Use when targeting the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism or deciding whether a clinical-endocrinology or metabolism study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's broad endocrine-organ fit, the clinical-evidence and methodological bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, Endocrine Society/OUP house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Journal Of Clinical Endocrinology And Metabolism?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism
description: Use when targeting the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism or deciding whether a clinical-endocrinology or metabolism study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's broad endocrine-organ fit, the clinical-evidence and methodological bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, Endocrine Society/OUP house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
---
# Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism)
## Journal positioning
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (JCEM, Endocrine Society / Oxford
University Press) is the Endocrine Society's flagship clinical journal, publishing
research across the **full breadth of clinical endocrinology and metabolism** — thyroid,
adrenal, pituitary/neuroendocrine, bone and mineral, reproductive endocrinology,
obesity, lipid, and diabetes/metabolism — with an emphasis on human, patient-oriented
studies that inform endocrine diagnosis and management. Its defining expectation is a
**clinically important advance in the diagnosis, treatment, or pathophysiology of an
endocrine or metabolic disorder in humans**, not a narrow single-center series, a pure
animal study with no human translation, or a diabetes-only paper better placed in a
dedicated diabetes journal. Breadth across endocrine organs is a feature: JCEM is the
generalist endocrine venue. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid;
it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current
instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live JCEM author instructions.
## When to trigger
- The author names JCEM for a clinical-endocrinology or metabolism study across any
endocrine organ system and wants a fit/framing check.
- An endocrine study must be re-framed around a patient-oriented diagnostic, therapeutic,
or pathophysiologic question.
- The author is choosing between JCEM (broad endocrine), Diabetologia (diabetes-specific),
and The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (high-impact trials).
- The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and human-endocrine-study
expectations.
## Scope & topic fit
- Thyroid, adrenal, and pituitary/neuroendocrine disorders: diagnosis, hormone assays,
and management studies.
- Bone, mineral, and calcium metabolism: osteoporosis, parathyroid, and vitamin-D
endocrinology.
- Reproductive and developmental endocrinology: PCOS, hypogonadism, fertility, and
pubertal/growth disorders.
- Obesity, lipid, and energy metabolism with endocrine mechanism or clinical management
endpoints.
- Diabetes and glucose metabolism as part of broad endocrine practice (with awareness of
diabetes-dedicated venues).
- Endocrine clinical trials, cohorts, biomarker/hormone-assay validation, and
pharmacologic/hormone-therapy studies in humans.
## Method & evidence bar
- Studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered endocrine
endpoints; surrogate hormone endpoints need clinical justification.
- The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials,
STROBE for observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, STARD for diagnostic/assay
accuracy.
- Trials require prospective registration and the registration number; protocol/SAP are
expected.
- Hormone assays and biomarker methods must be validated and described (platform,
reference intervals, harmonization); analytic rigor is scrutinized.
- Observational claims must address confounding, bias, and missing data; causal language
must match the design.
- Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures;
clinical significance must be argued.
## Structure & house style
- Endocrine Society/OUP format with a structured abstract and a precis/context-and-significance
statement; re-check current article types (Clinical Research Article, etc.) and limits on
the live guide.
- The introduction frames the endocrine clinical question; the discussion states the
diagnostic or management implication plainly.
- A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD flow diagram is expected for the relevant design.
- Tables/figures follow the journal's statistical-reporting standards; a supplement carries
the protocol, full assay/statistical methods, and additional analyses.
## Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and
`../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and Endocrine
Society/OUP anchors, then cite the current JCEM page you checked.
- Search the live site for "JCEM Endocrine Society instructions for authors" and follow
the current version.
- Re-check article types, abstract and precis format, and word/figure/reference limits.
- Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD),
assay-validation reporting, data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
- Re-check IRB/ethics and consent, ICMJE authorship and conflict-of-interest disclosure,
funding, and AI-use disclosure.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions
win.
## Pre-submission self-check
- [ ] The study answers a patient-oriented endocrine diagnostic, therapeutic, or pathophysiologic question.
- [ ] Endocrine endpoints are prespecified and powered; trials are registered with the number in the manuscript.
- [ ] The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD) is completed and attached.
- [ ] Hormone assays/biomarkers are validated and fully described.
- [ ] Confounding, bias, and missing data are addressed; causal language matches the design.
- [ ] IRB/consent, ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.
## Common desk-reject triggers
- Single-center descriptive series with limited generalizability and no clear management change.
- Pure animal/cell endocrine studies with no human translation or clinical relevance.
- Unvalidated or poorly described hormone assays underpinning the main claim.
- Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
- Diabetes-only or single-trial work better placed in a dedicated diabetes or high-impact venue.
## Re-routing decision
- Diabetes-focused clinical/epidemiologic or basic study → `diabetologia`.
- High-impact diabetes/endocrine trial with broad reach → `the-lancet-diabetes-and-endocrinology`.
- Diabetic kidney disease centered on nephrology → `journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology` / `kidney-international`.
- Endocrine surgery (thyroid/adrenal/pituitary surgical outcomes) → `jama-surgery`.
- Broad practice-changing endocrine trial → general medicine (`jama` / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).
## Output format
```text
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (Endocrine Society/OUP)
[Specialty tags] <thyroid / adrenal / pituitary / bone-mineral / reproductive / metabolism>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / assay-STARD>
[Method/evidence] <power, assay validation, design, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / assay reporting / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!