Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Jop Topic Selection

ASecurity

Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits The Journal of Politics (JOP) and which category to target. JOP is a general-interest journal across all subfields that prizes theoretical innovation and methodological diversity, and it counts pages (Research Article <= 35, Short Article <= 10), not words. Helps frame the question and pick the category; it does not collect data.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jop-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Jop Topic Selection?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Jop Topic Selection
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-jop-topic-selection/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jop-topic-selection)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: jop-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits The Journal of Politics (JOP) and which category to target. JOP is a general-interest journal across all subfields that prizes theoretical innovation and methodological diversity, and it counts pages (Research Article <= 35, Short Article <= 10), not words. Helps frame the question and pick the category; it does not collect data.
---

# Topic Selection & Fit (jop-topic-selection)

JOP is a **general-interest** journal across the whole discipline, but its bar is **theoretical
innovation + methodological diversity**, not subfield novelty alone. Use this skill to pressure-test
fit — and to decide between a **Research Article** and a **Short Article** under JOP's **page budget**.

## When to trigger

- Choosing among possible projects or framings for a JOP submission
- A colleague said the paper feels "too incremental" or "of interest only to specialists"
- Deciding between a **Research Article** (≤ 35 pp) and a **Short Article** (≤ 10 pp)
- Unsure whether the contribution is sharp enough to land within JOP's page limits

## The JOP fit test

A strong JOP paper usually clears all four:

1. **General interest.** A political scientist outside your subfield should see why it matters. JOP
   spans American, comparative, formal theory, IR, methodology, political theory, and public
   administration/policy — write so a reader from another of those cares.
2. **Theoretical innovation.** JOP explicitly prizes "theoretically innovative" work — a new argument,
   mechanism, measure, or reconceptualization, not just one more estimate.
3. **Credible on its own methodological terms.** Empirical, formal/game-theoretic, experimental,
   computational, qualitative, or normative — JOP's conception of method is "broad and encompassing,"
   but each must be done rigorously (see `jop-research-design`).
4. **Answerable within the page budget.** Sharp enough to convince within **35 pages** (Research
   Article) or **10 pages** (Short Article), double-spaced — overflow goes to the **≤ 25-page Online
   Appendix**, not into a bloated main text.

## Subfield framing (write for the general reader)

| Home subfield | Reach the general JOP reader by… |
|---------------|-----------------------------------|
| American politics | drawing the institution/behavior mechanism that travels beyond the US case |
| Comparative | stating the general logic, not just the country case |
| International relations | connecting to cooperation, conflict, or institutions as general phenomena |
| Formal theory | pairing the model with an interpretable empirical or substantive payoff |
| Political theory | showing why the normative/conceptual stakes matter beyond the seminar |
| Public administration / policy | tying the finding to governance questions others can use |

## Category choice

- **Research Article** — full study, broad claim, **≤ 35 pages** (incl. notes, refs, exhibits).
- **Short Article** — one crisp contribution (a decisive test, a measurement advance, a focused
  reappraisal), **≤ 10 pages**. Faster to read and review; do not inflate it into a Research Article.

## Anti-patterns

- "Never studied in country X" as the whole contribution (incremental, specialist-only)
- A clever method demo with no substantive political-science payoff
- A sprawling question that cannot land within 35 pages even with a full appendix
- Choosing Research-Article length out of habit when a Short Article would hit harder and review faster

## Output format

```
【Question】one sentence
【General interest】who outside the subfield cares, and why
【Innovation】new theory / mechanism / measure / reconceptualization / decisive test
【Category】Research Article (≤35 pp) / Short Article (≤10 pp)
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】jop-literature-positioning
```

## Supplementary resources

- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — data sources by subfield
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — JOP scope, categories, page limits

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →