Use when testing whether a marketing question is a fit for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) — a methods-/modeling-forward AMA flagship — rather than the managerial Journal of Marketing, the analytical Marketing Science, or the consumer-theory JCR. Locks a question that can clear both JMR's rigor bar and its substantive-contribution bar.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jmr Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jmr-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jmr-topic-selection
description: Use when testing whether a marketing question is a fit for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) — a methods-/modeling-forward AMA flagship — rather than the managerial Journal of Marketing, the analytical Marketing Science, or the consumer-theory JCR. Locks a question that can clear both JMR's rigor bar and its substantive-contribution bar.
---
# Topic Selection & JMR Fit (jmr-topic-selection)
## When to trigger
- You have a marketing idea but are unsure JMR is the right AMA/marketing venue
- A finding is managerially interesting but you are unsure it advances research
- You cannot tell whether the paper is behavioral, modeling/econometric, or methods
- A coauthor says "this might be a JM paper" or "this is really Marketing Science"
## The JMR fit test
JMR publishes the **full spectrum of marketing topics with an emphasis on methodological rigor** and welcomes a **wide variety of data and methodological approaches**. Fit at JMR is a **dual** test, not a topic test:
1. **Rigor bar** — Can the design credibly support the claim? (clean experimental identification, a defensible causal/econometric strategy, or a well-identified structural model.)
2. **Substance bar** — Do marketing researchers *learn something* — a new substantive insight about consumers, markets, or marketing actions, or a usable methodological advance? A flawless null with no insight does not clear it.
A JMR-fit topic clears **both**. A topic that is only managerially compelling but methodologically thin belongs at *Journal of Marketing*; a topic that is only a clever model with no marketing payoff belongs at *Marketing Science*.
## Classify the genre early
| Genre | Center of gravity | Typical JMR home |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| Behavioral | Lab/field experiments, consumer psychology, process tests | Yes |
| Modeling / econometric | Choice models, structural demand, causal field data | Yes |
| Methods contribution | A new estimator, measure, or research procedure | Yes |
The genre sets which downstream skills do the heavy lifting (`jmr-methods`, `jmr-data-analysis`).
## Sister-journal triage
- **Journal of Marketing (JM)** — manager-facing, substantive framing; lighter on method. If the lead is "what should managers do," consider JM.
- **Marketing Science** — analytical/structural quantitative marketing; if the contribution is the model itself with no broad marketing-research insight, it may fit there.
- **Journal of Consumer Research (JCR)** — deep consumer-behavior theory, interdisciplinary; if the payoff is a consumer-psychology theory rather than a method-credible marketing finding, consider JCR.
## Pre-commitment checks
- A one-sentence research question naming the marketing phenomenon and the unit (consumer, firm, market).
- A stated genre and the matching identification/estimation plan.
- An explicit "what we learn" sentence — substantive, methodological, or both.
- Feasible data/stimuli that can survive the **exact-statistics** mandate (p-values to three digits, SEs, effect sizes) and **replication** disclosure.
## Anti-patterns
- Choosing a topic on managerial appeal alone (a JM signal, not JMR).
- A method showcase with no marketing payoff (a Marketing Science risk).
- Picking a question whose data can never support credible identification.
- Deferring the genre decision until methods — it should be set now.
## Output format
```text
[Target] JMR
[Question] one sentence
[Genre] behavioral / modeling-econometric / methods
[Rigor bar] can the design support the claim? ...
[Substance bar] what do researchers learn? ...
[Sister-journal risk] JM / Marketing Science / JCR → answer
[Next skill] jmr-theory-development
```
## Resources
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md)
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!