Use when defending the research design of a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript — longitudinal and life-course designs, dyadic and family-level analysis, family-demographic methods, experiments, and qualitative/multi-method designs. JMF judges each tradition on its own terms and is alert to selection. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmf-research-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jmf Research Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jmf-research-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jmf-research-design
description: Use when defending the research design of a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript — longitudinal and life-course designs, dyadic and family-level analysis, family-demographic methods, experiments, and qualitative/multi-method designs. JMF judges each tradition on its own terms and is alert to selection. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
---
# Research Design (jmf-research-design)
JMF accepts quantitative, qualitative, and multi-method work but is demanding about each. The design
must connect the framework (`jmf-theory-and-conceptual-framework`) to evidence while respecting the
**unit of analysis** (individual, dyad, family, household, cohort) and the **non-independence** of
people who share a relationship. This skill is mode-aware: pick the section that fits your work.
## When to trigger
- Specifying the design, sample, measures, and identification strategy
- A reviewer questioned **selection**, causal claims, generalizability, or the handling of dyads
- Designing a longitudinal, dyadic, family-level, or comparative study
- Preparing a pre-analysis plan or planning a replication
## Quantitative — longitudinal / family demography
- **Life-course / panel**: growth curves, cross-lagged panel, fixed effects within persons or
couples, change-score models; be explicit about timing, sequencing, and time-varying covariates.
- **Event history / survival**: discrete- or continuous-time hazards for marriage, cohabitation,
divorce, fertility; competing risks where multiple exits are possible.
- **Family demography**: rates, life tables, decomposition, standardization; complex-survey weights,
clusters, and strata applied correctly.
- **Selection is the default rival.** State how you address it — fixed effects, sibling/twin designs,
propensity methods with sensitivity, natural experiments/IV, or honest scoping to association.
## Quantitative — dyadic & family-level
- **Couples/dyads**: Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), dyadic SEM, multilevel models with
members nested in couples; distinguish distinguishable vs. indistinguishable dyads.
- **Families with multiple members/children**: multilevel/mixed models; account for clustering within
families; model coparenting and sibling structure where relevant.
- **Measurement**: validate constructs; report reliability; test invariance across partners, groups,
or time before comparing.
## Experiments (lab / survey / field)
- Preregister design and primary analyses; report power/MDE for the relevant unit (often the dyad or
family, not the person); pre-specify subgroups. Address attrition, manipulation checks, and ethics/
IRB and consent for couples, children, and families.
## Qualitative / multi-method
- **Sampling and case logic** stated by design (theoretical, maximum-variation, paired), not
convenience; say what the case is a case *of*.
- **Multi-perspective family data** (both partners, parents and children): plan how interdependent
accounts are analyzed and reconciled.
- **Integration** in mixed methods: explicit joint displays; say what each strand adds.
## The selection-and-interdependence test (JMF-specific)
For the strongest rival (usually **selection**), write: *"If selection rather than my mechanism drove
this, the data would look like ___; instead they look like ___."* Then confirm the model **respects
non-independence** of partners/family members. If either fails, the design does not yet identify the
contribution.
## Anti-patterns
- Treating couple or family data as independent observations
- "Causal" language on an observational design with unaddressed selection
- Naive cross-sectional snapshots for inherently longitudinal family processes
- Ignoring panel attrition or differential dropout in family studies
- Convenience case selection dressed up as theory-driven
## Output format
```
【Mode】longitudinal-demographic / dyadic-family / experiment / qualitative-mixed
【Unit of analysis】individual / dyad / family / household / cohort
【Estimand or claim】what is being identified/shown
【Selection handled】the adjudication sentence
【Non-independence】how clustering/dyad structure is modeled
【Robustness/sensitivity】planned checks
【Next】jmf-data-analysis
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — dyadic/multilevel/survival packages and family datasets
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — JMF methods scope and replication guidance
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!