Use when assessing whether a research question fits the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) — monetary theory and policy, central banking, business cycles, growth, financial intermediation, fiscal interactions, and expectations — before investing in a model or estimation. Checks scope fit and the policy/conceptual payoff bar.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jme-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jme Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jme-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jme-topic-selection
description: Use when assessing whether a research question fits the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) — monetary theory and policy, central banking, business cycles, growth, financial intermediation, fiscal interactions, and expectations — before investing in a model or estimation. Checks scope fit and the policy/conceptual payoff bar.
---
# Topic Selection & Scope Fit (jme-topic-selection)
## When to trigger
- You have a macro idea but are unsure it is "monetary enough" for JME
- The question is technically interesting but its macro or policy payoff is unclear
- You are choosing between a generalist top journal and a field outlet
- You want to target the Carnegie-Rochester-NYU policy issue or the Gerzensee macro-policy issue
## The JME scope
JME publishes **monetary economics and macroeconomics broadly defined**: monetary theory and policy, central banking, business cycles, growth, financial markets and intermediation, fiscal–monetary interactions, expectations, and the macroeconomic effects of money and finance. It welcomes **both theoretical and empirical work**, including DSGE / quantitative macro and applied policy analysis. A good JME paper is not a narrow micro-empirical estimate dressed in macro language; it speaks to how money, finance, and policy shape aggregate outcomes.
Two scope tells make JME distinctive. First, **one issue each year is devoted to the Carnegie-Rochester-NYU Conference Series on Public Policy** — a defining feature signaling JME's appetite for serious monetary/fiscal policy questions — and roughly every two years an additional issue carries proceedings from the **Swiss National Bank Study Center Gerzensee** macro-policy conference. Second, the journal is equally hospitable to a clean **quantitative model** (e.g., a DSGE or HANK mechanism) and to a credible **empirical** study (e.g., the effects of an identified monetary shock).
## Fit checklist
- [ ] The dependent question is about **aggregate** behavior, money/finance, or policy — not a self-contained micro effect
- [ ] There is a clear **monetary, macro, or policy lesson** a central banker or macroeconomist would care about
- [ ] The paper is either a disciplined **quantitative model** or a **credibly identified** empirical study (ideally both)
- [ ] The question is **first-order**, not a marginal refinement of a settled result
- [ ] If policy-conference-flavored, consider the **Carnegie-Rochester-NYU** or **Gerzensee** fit
## Off-fit signals (redirect)
- A pure labor/IO/development micro paper with no macro aggregation → a field or generalist journal
- A new estimator with no monetary/macro application → *Econometrica* / *Journal of Econometrics*
- A finance-asset-pricing paper with no monetary or macro mechanism → a finance journal
- A descriptive data paper with no conceptual or policy payoff → reconsider the contribution
## Output format
```
【Question】one sentence (aggregate/monetary/policy?)
【Mode】theoretical / quantitative-DSGE / empirical / mixed
【JME fit】strong / borderline / off-fit + why
【Policy lesson】the macro takeaway in one line
【Special issue?】Carnegie-Rochester-NYU / Gerzensee / regular
【Next step】jme-literature-positioning
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!