Explain how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality. Use to set expectations for what happens after you submit and how decisions are made.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jfqa Review Process?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jfqa-review-process)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jfqa-review-process
description: Explain how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality. Use to set expectations for what happens after you submit and how decisions are made.
---
# JFQA Review Process (jfqa-review-process)
Use this skill to understand what happens to a **JFQA** manuscript after submission, so you submit informed and read decision letters correctly.
## Who decides
- JFQA has **no single Editor-in-Chief**. It is led by a team of **seven Managing Editors** (as of 2026): Hendrik Bessembinder, Ran Duchin, Thierry Foucault, Jarrad Harford, Kai Li, George Pennacchi, and Stephan Siegel, supported by advisory editors and 50+ associate editors.
- A Managing Editor is assigned per paper; that editor decides whether to desk-reject or send the paper to reviewer(s). (The specific handling editor is assigned per submission — 待核实 for any individual case.)
## The review model
- **Double-anonymous** peer review (Cambridge Core terminology). Author-identifying information is removed and the manuscript PDF is sent **blind to the reviewer(s)**. Anonymize accordingly (see jfqa-writing-style / jfqa-submission).
## Fee and the desk-screen economics
- A **$350 submission fee** (credit card only) is charged up front. If the Managing Editor elects **not** to send the paper to a reviewer, **$275 is refunded** — so a desk reject still costs you **$75** in handling. Budget for this.
## Selectivity
- JFQA prints **less than 9%** of the **more than 1,000** manuscripts submitted annually. Most papers do not clear review; a clean, well-identified, well-formatted submission is how you survive the first screen.
## What to expect
- A desk decision (reject, or send to review), then — if reviewed — referee reports and an editor decision (reject / R&R / rarely accept). R&Rs are demanding; see jfqa-rebuttal.
## Output format
```
【Editor】per-paper Managing Editor (7-person panel)
【Model】double-anonymous; blind to reviewers
【Fee math】$350 paid; $75 retained on desk reject
【Odds】<9% printed of 1,000+; expect attrition
【Next step】jfqa-submission (preflight) → jfqa-rebuttal (on R&R)
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!