Position a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) manuscript against the finance frontier — corporate finance, investments, asset pricing, market microstructure, and financial institutions. Use to stake a precise contribution against the relevant literature without a standalone survey, so the paper reads as new to a quantitative-finance audience.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-literature-positioning --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jfqa Literature Positioning?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jfqa-literature-positioning)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jfqa-literature-positioning
description: Position a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) manuscript against the finance frontier — corporate finance, investments, asset pricing, market microstructure, and financial institutions. Use to stake a precise contribution against the relevant literature without a standalone survey, so the paper reads as new to a quantitative-finance audience.
---
# JFQA Literature Positioning (jfqa-literature-positioning)
Use this skill to locate a **JFQA** manuscript against the finance literature so the contribution is unmistakable to the reviewers and the assigned Managing Editor.
## What JFQA expects
- A **tight positioning paragraph**, not a literature-review chapter. State what is known, the specific gap, and what this paper adds.
- Engagement with the **right finance subfield** frontier — corporate finance, investments/asset pricing, microstructure, or institutions — and with the closest recent JFQA / finance-flagship work.
- Honest delineation from **near-neighbor papers**: say explicitly how your sample, design, mechanism, or result differs.
## Process
1. Identify the 5-10 closest papers in your subfield and the one or two that a referee will say "this is already done."
2. Write the contrast in one or two sentences each: what they did, what you do differently, why the difference matters economically.
3. Tie the contribution to JFQA's quantitative ethos — a new measurement, a sharper identification, a model with testable implications, or a result that overturns/refines a stylized fact.
4. Avoid claiming "first to study X" unless you can defend it; finance is crowded.
## Anti-patterns
- A chronological survey that buries the contribution.
- Citing only your own or only old papers; missing the obvious recent competitor.
- Over-claiming novelty a referee can puncture with one citation — which, on a resubmission of a previously rejected paper, must also be disclosed (see jfqa-submission).
- Positioning as "interesting" rather than as a quantitative advance.
## Output format
```
【Subfield frontier】corporate / investments / microstructure / institutions
【Closest rivals】2-4 papers + the one-line contrast each
【Gap】the specific unanswered quantitative question
【Our contribution】one sentence, defensible
【Next step】jfqa-identification-strategy
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!