Use when working on Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscripts to test whether the paper is centrally about banking and financial intermediation — and whether to lead with theory or empirics — before investing in the draft.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfi-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jfi Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jfi-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jfi-topic-selection
description: Use when working on Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscripts to test whether the paper is centrally about banking and financial intermediation — and whether to lead with theory or empirics — before investing in the draft.
---
# Topic Selection (jfi-topic-selection)
## When to trigger
- Deciding whether a project fits the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) at all
- Choosing whether the paper's spine is a model (theory) or an empirical design
## The JFI fit bar
JFI is an Elsevier journal on **banking, financial intermediation, and the economics of financial
institutions and markets**, publishing **both theory and empirics**. The decisive question is: **is an
intermediary or financial-institution mechanism first-order?** Strong fits put banks, lenders, dealers,
insurers, or other intermediaries — and the frictions they resolve or create (information asymmetry,
monitoring, liquidity transformation, capital and regulation, relationship lending) — at the center.
A paper is **off-fit** if intermediation is incidental: a pure asset-pricing result, a corporate-finance
study where banks are just a control, or a macro paper with no institutional channel. Redirect those to a
general finance or field journal unless you can make the intermediation mechanism the load-bearing
contribution.
## Theory vs. empirics (decide early)
- **Theory-led:** the contribution is a model of intermediary behavior or a market friction. Plan around
assumptions, propositions, and proof exposition (see jfi-identification-strategy) and a numerical example
(see jfi-data-analysis).
- **Empirics-led:** the contribution is a credibly identified fact about banks/credit. Plan around a causal
design and bank/loan-level data (see jfi-identification-strategy, jfi-data-analysis).
This choice shapes how almost every later skill is applied, so make it now.
## Anti-patterns
- Submitting an asset-pricing or corporate-finance paper where intermediation is decorative
- Leaving "theory or empirics?" unresolved, producing a paper that is thin on both
- Choosing JFI only because of fit with a sub-literature without a clear intermediary mechanism
## Output format
```
【Intermediation mechanism】<the first-order bank/intermediary channel>
【Fit verdict】strong / borderline / redirect-elsewhere
【Paper type】theory-led / empirics-led / both
【Next skill】jfi-literature-positioning
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!