Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Jf Internet Appendix

ASecurity

Use when deciding what belongs in the Internet Appendix vs. the main text of a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript. Allocates content and structures the appendix per JF's actual policy; it does not generate the results.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jf-internet-appendix --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Jf Internet Appendix?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Jf Internet Appendix
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-jf-internet-appendix/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jf-internet-appendix)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: jf-internet-appendix
description: Use when deciding what belongs in the Internet Appendix vs. the main text of a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript. Allocates content and structures the appendix per JF's actual policy; it does not generate the results.
---

# Internet Appendix (jf-internet-appendix)

## When to trigger

- The main text is bloated with proofs, secondary robustness tables, or data-construction detail
- A referee will ask for more checks but the article is near the 60-page limit
- You are unsure how JF wants the Internet Appendix submitted and hosted
- The main result is buried on page 40 behind diagnostics

## JF's actual Internet Appendix policy

The "Internet Appendix" is a **JF convention** (JF helped popularize it). JF's specifics differ from generic "online appendices":

- **At submission, the Internet Appendix is placed at the END of the same PDF as the manuscript — NOT uploaded as a separate file.** Put the title **"Internet Appendix"** at the top of its first page so it is not mistaken for a regular appendix.
- The Internet Appendix **does not count toward JF's 60-page manuscript limit** (manuscript: ≤60 pp, ≥1.5 spacing, 12-pt font).
- The **paper must be self-contained**: a reader must understand the study in full **without** consulting the Internet Appendix.
- **On acceptance**, the appendix is published as the **Internet Appendix with the online article on the publisher's (Wiley) site**.
> Source: afajof.org/submissions and the JF Submission Guidelines (Rev. March 12, 2024), accessed 2026-05-30.

## What goes where

| Content                                                        | Main text | Internet Appendix |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|:---------:|:-----------------:|
| The question, design, headline result, economic magnitude      |     X     |                   |
| The 3–6 decisive robustness checks                             |     X     |                   |
| Full proofs / derivations of propositions                      |           |         X         |
| Secondary / exhaustive robustness tables                       |           |         X         |
| Detailed variable construction, data filters, sample steps     |   brief   |     full detail   |
| Alternative measures / extra subsamples / extra factor models  |           |         X         |
| Monte Carlo / simulation evidence                              |           |         X         |
| Additional figures, summary-stat breakdowns                    |           |         X         |

## Structuring the Internet Appendix

- Mirror the main-text section order; label tables `IA.I`, `IA.II`, … and figures `IA.1`, `IA.2`, ….
- Every appendix item must be **referenced from the main text** ("see Internet Appendix Table IA.IV") — orphan tables read as padding.
- Keep each appendix table self-contained, same note conventions as the main exhibits (`jf-tables-figures`).
- Note: replication **code** is handled separately under JF's Data and Code Sharing Policy (Supplementary Information at acceptance), not via the Internet Appendix — see `jf-submission`.

## Checklist

- [ ] Internet Appendix is at the END of the same PDF, titled "Internet Appendix"
- [ ] Main text is self-contained and ≤60 pages on its own
- [ ] All proofs/derivations are in the Internet Appendix, not interleaved in the body
- [ ] Every Internet Appendix item is cited from the main text
- [ ] IA numbering and note conventions match the main exhibits
- [ ] No genuinely new headline finding appears only in the appendix

## Anti-patterns

- Uploading the Internet Appendix as a separate file (JF wants it bundled in the same PDF at submission)
- Writing a body that cannot be understood without the appendix (JF requires self-containment)
- Treating the Internet Appendix as a junk drawer of uncited tables
- Padding the body past 60 pages and pushing core results into the appendix to dodge the limit

## Output format

```
【IA bundled at end of same PDF + titled?】yes / no
【Body self-contained and ≤60 pp?】yes / no
【Proofs relocated?】yes / no
【All IA items cited from body?】yes / no
【New result hidden in appendix?】yes / no
【Next step】jf-writing-style
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →