Use when polishing the prose of a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — front-loading the consumer insight, writing for an interdisciplinary readership, and conforming to JCR/Chicago house style, the 200-word abstract, and double-anonymized anonymization. Late-stage polish; do not use it to rescue a thin contribution (jcr-contribution-framing).
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcr-writing-style --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jcr Writing Style?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jcr-writing-style)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jcr-writing-style
description: Use when polishing the prose of a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — front-loading the consumer insight, writing for an interdisciplinary readership, and conforming to JCR/Chicago house style, the 200-word abstract, and double-anonymized anonymization. Late-stage polish; do not use it to rescue a thin contribution (jcr-contribution-framing).
---
# Writing Style (jcr-writing-style)
## When to trigger
- The argument is buried under jargon or a long literature wind-up
- A reviewer from another discipline says the paper is hard to follow
- You are finalizing the abstract, headings, and references before submission
- You need to confirm Chicago house style and complete anonymization
## Write for an interdisciplinary consumer-research reader
JCR's audience spans **psychology, anthropology, sociology, economics, marketing, statistics, and communication**, and the journal is governed by a Policy Board of ~11 sponsoring societies. Your prose must be legible to readers outside your own subfield: define field-specific terms, lead with the **consumption phenomenon and the insight** rather than the method, and avoid in-group shorthand that excludes half the readership. An experimentalist should follow a CCT paper's argument and vice versa.
Front-load the contribution. The opening should make the consumer-behavior question, the conceptual stakes, and the "what we learn" vivid before the reader reaches the studies. Carry one explicit contribution sentence into the introduction and discussion (see `jcr-contribution-framing`).
## House style: Chicago, Word, and the abstract
- JCR follows its **style guide**, and for anything not covered, the **Chicago Manual of Style** — including **title capitalization** and **author-date referencing** (note: Chicago, **not APA**, which is unusual among behavioral/marketing journals). Configure your reference manager to a Chicago author-date style and reconcile against the JCR style guide.
- The manuscript is prepared in **Microsoft Word**; the final accepted version must also be supplied in Word.
- The **abstract is ≤200 words** — separate from the ≤300-word Consumer Relevance and Contribution Statement. Keep the abstract a tight summary of question, approach, and contribution.
## Anonymization in the prose (double-anonymized review)
JCR uses **double-anonymized** review, so the writing itself must not leak identity:
- Remove affiliations, author notes, acknowledgments, and identifying URLs from the manuscript.
- Use generic phrasing such as "a large public university" instead of naming your institution or field site.
- Phrase self-citations neutrally (third person); self-citation is allowed only if the cited work is publicly available.
## Checklist
- [ ] Contribution front-loaded; consumer insight precedes method
- [ ] Prose legible across disciplines; field jargon defined
- [ ] Chicago title capitalization and author-date references; reconciled with the JCR style guide
- [ ] Abstract ≤200 words; distinct from the ≤300-word Consumer Relevance Statement
- [ ] Manuscript in Word
- [ ] Anonymization complete: no affiliations, acknowledgments, identifying URLs; generic site phrasing
- [ ] Self-citations neutral and anonymization-safe
## Anti-patterns
- A long literature wind-up before the reader learns the point.
- Subfield jargon that excludes half of JCR's interdisciplinary readership.
- APA-style references left in a Chicago journal.
- Naming your institution or field site in the anonymized manuscript.
- Treating polish as a substitute for a real contribution to consumer theory.
## Output format
```
【Front-loading】insight before method? yes/fix
【Interdisciplinary legibility】jargon defined? pass/fix
【House style】Chicago title-case + author-date; Word; abstract ≤200 words
【Anonymization】affiliations/acknowledgments/URLs removed; generic site phrasing
【Next step】jcr-submission
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!