Use when building the exhibits for a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — study-summary tables, mediation/moderation results, interaction and spotlight plots, conceptual/process figures, and CCT data displays — in Chicago house style, mindful of the 60-page embedding rule and the web appendix. Late-stage polish; settle the contribution first (jcr-contribution-framing).
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcr-tables-figures --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jcr Tables Figures?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jcr-tables-figures)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jcr-tables-figures
description: Use when building the exhibits for a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — study-summary tables, mediation/moderation results, interaction and spotlight plots, conceptual/process figures, and CCT data displays — in Chicago house style, mindful of the 60-page embedding rule and the web appendix. Late-stage polish; settle the contribution first (jcr-contribution-framing).
---
# Tables & Figures (jcr-tables-figures)
## When to trigger
- Exhibits are cluttered, inconsistent, or not self-explanatory
- You need a clear way to summarize a multi-study experimental package
- An interaction or mediation result needs a readable plot
- You are deciding what stays in the manuscript vs. the web appendix
## Remember the JCR page-counting convention
JCR caps the manuscript at **60 double-spaced pages**, and crucially **tables and figures are embedded and count toward that cap** (the cap covers title, abstract, main text with tables/figures embedded, appendices, and references). So exhibits are not "free" the way they are at venues that exclude them — design them to **earn their space**. Move overflow stimuli, full instruments, additional study tables, and supplementary plots to the **web appendix** (max 40 MB), which is distinct from a manuscript appendix and does **not** count toward the cap.
## Exhibits for the experimental package
- **Study-summary table:** one row per study with design, manipulation, key DV, N, and the result — lets reviewers see the convergent multi-study logic at a glance.
- **Means/cells:** report condition means with SDs and Ns; show the predicted pattern clearly.
- **Mediation:** present indirect effects with **bootstrap confidence intervals**; a path diagram with coefficients aids comprehension.
- **Moderation:** plot **simple slopes**; for continuous moderators show the **spotlight/floodlight** result (Johnson-Neyman region) rather than a bar chart of a median split.
- **Process figure:** a clean conceptual/process model (IV → mediator → DV, with moderators) orients the interdisciplinary reader.
## Exhibits for interpretive / CCT work
- **Data-structure or thematic display:** show the path from raw data (quotations/observations) to second-order constructs and the conceptual framework.
- **Representative evidence table:** illustrative quotations mapped to constructs, supporting the audit trail.
- Keep displays interpretive and legible to readers who do not work in CCT.
## House style and consistency
- Follow the JCR style guide; for anything it does not cover, JCR defaults to the **Chicago Manual of Style** (including title capitalization). Configure exhibit titles and notes accordingly.
- Each exhibit must be **self-contained**: title, units, N, significance notation, and a note defining abbreviations.
- Keep construct names, hypothesis labels, and study numbers identical between text and exhibits.
- Anonymize exhibits for double-anonymized review (no author-identifying file names, site names, or institution tells).
## Checklist
- [ ] Each exhibit is self-explanatory (title, N, units, notes)
- [ ] Multi-study package summarized in one table
- [ ] Mediation shown with bootstrap CIs; moderation via simple slopes / spotlight
- [ ] A clean process/conceptual figure is included (experiments)
- [ ] CCT: data-structure / representative-evidence displays included
- [ ] Chicago-style titles/notes; labels consistent with the text
- [ ] Exhibits earn their space under the 60-page embedded cap; overflow in the web appendix
- [ ] Exhibits anonymized for masked review
## Anti-patterns
- Median-split bar charts standing in for a spotlight analysis.
- Tables that repeat the text instead of compressing it.
- Exhibits that silently break anonymization (site/institution names).
- Padding the manuscript with figures that should live in the web appendix.
- Inconsistent labels between text, tables, and figures.
## Output format
```
【Study-summary table】drafted? rows = studies
【Mediation/Moderation exhibits】bootstrap CI / simple slopes / spotlight: yes/no
【Process or CCT framework figure】included?
【Page-budget】embedded exhibits justified; overflow → web appendix
【House style】Chicago titles/notes; labels consistent; anonymized
【Next step】jcr-writing-style
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!