Use when navigating the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) editorial process — single-blind peer review by anonymous reviewers in addition to the Editor, with final accept/reject authority vested in the Editor-in-Chief, plus the three-papers-under-review cap and the rule that rejected papers are not resubmittable unless invited.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jape-review-process --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jape Review Process?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jape-review-process)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jape-review-process
description: Use when navigating the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) editorial process — single-blind peer review by anonymous reviewers in addition to the Editor, with final accept/reject authority vested in the Editor-in-Chief, plus the three-papers-under-review cap and the rule that rejected papers are not resubmittable unless invited.
---
# Review Process at JAE (jape-review-process)
## When to trigger
- Setting expectations for how a JAE submission will be evaluated
- Understanding who decides and what referees focus on
- Planning a pipeline around JAE's submission and resubmission rules
## How JAE review works
- **Single-blind peer review.** Official text: manuscripts are "single-blind peer reviewed by **anonymous reviewers in addition to the Editor**." Reviewers are anonymous; **authors are not** — do not anonymize the manuscript the way a double-blind journal would.
- **Editor-in-Chief decides.** Final acceptance or rejection rests with the **Editor-in-Chief** (Barbara Rossi). Co-editors handle many papers, but the final call is the EiC's. (The full current co-editor roster is **待核实** against a live board page.)
- **Rejected papers are not resubmittable unless the Editor invites it.** Treat a rejection as final absent an explicit invitation.
- **Cap:** no more than **three papers** from the same author may be under review at once — stagger submissions.
## What applied-econometrics referees check
Because JAE is empirical and replicable, expect reviewers to probe whether the **estimand is identified** on your real data; whether the **method is useful** in that setting; whether **inference** is appropriate (HAC, clustered, weak-IV-robust); whether **robustness** is shown (in the unlimited online appendix); and whether the work is **reproducible**, consistent with the mandatory Data Archive deposit. Treat replication objections as central, not administrative; a clean package pre-empts many. Do not infer process details beyond what the source map verifies.
## Output format
```
【Model】single-blind; reviewers anonymous, authors not — prepared? [Y/N]
【Authority】final decision = Editor-in-Chief
【Pipeline】≤ 3 papers under review for this author? [Y/N]
【Resubmit】reject is final unless invited — understood? [Y/N]
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — single-blind, EiC authority, three-paper cap (and 待核实 board notes)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!