Use when planning a full ISCA campaign on a calendar — working back from the expected mid-November abstract and paper deadlines to freeze simulation evidence in time, staffing the winter two-round review wait, preparing for the February-March rebuttal and revision window, and branching to camera-ready, artifacts, and the June conference.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill isca-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Isca Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-isca-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: isca-workflow
description: Use when planning a full ISCA campaign on a calendar — working back from the expected mid-November abstract and paper deadlines to freeze simulation evidence in time, staffing the winter two-round review wait, preparing for the February-March rebuttal and revision window, and branching to camera-ready, artifacts, and the June conference.
---
# ISCA Workflow
An ISCA year has one gate. Miss mid-November and the next identical opportunity is
twelve months away, which is why experienced groups treat the ISCA calendar as an
engineering schedule with the deadline as tape-out. This skill lays out that
schedule using the verified ISCA 2026 dates as the template; as of 2026-07-08 the
ISCA 2027 CFP was not yet posted, so every 2027 date below is an expectation to
confirm against `iscaconf.org/isca2027/` the moment it exists (待核实).
## The verified 2026-cycle skeleton
| Milestone | ISCA 2026 date (verified) | What it means operationally |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract registration | November 10, 2025 | Title, abstract, authors, conflicts locked in HotCRP; paper content still fluid |
| Full paper | November 17, 2025 | The reviewed PDF — one week after abstracts, so the abstract week is a writing week, not a buffer |
| Round 1 reviews due | December 19, 2025 | First reviewer wave completes before the holidays |
| Round 2 reviews due | February 13, 2026 | Additional reviews on papers that advanced |
| Rebuttal + revision | February 16 - March 6, 2026 | Authors see reviews, respond, and may revise — a three-week working window |
| Conference | June 27 - July 1, 2026 (Raleigh, NC) | Presentation; artifact badges resolved before publication |
Industry-track submissions ran about a month behind (abstracts December 5, papers
December 12, 2025). Final notification date for 2026 was not captured in this
pack's verification — 待核实.
## Working backward from November
Count in weeks from the expected paper deadline (call it P, likely mid-November
2026 for ISCA 2027):
- **P minus 16 weeks (late July):** venue decision final (`isca-topic-selection`);
simulation or prototype infrastructure chosen and validated
(`isca-experiments`); the one-sentence claim written on the whiteboard.
- **P minus 10 weeks:** baseline configurations frozen and reproduced from scratch
by a second person. Baseline drift discovered later invalidates every downstream
number.
- **P minus 6 weeks:** main-result experiments complete. From here, compute goes to
sensitivity studies and reviewer-anticipation runs, not to the headline.
- **P minus 4 weeks:** full draft exists — bad prose, complete structure. Internal
"mock PC" read by two colleagues who did not build the system.
- **P minus 1 week (abstract deadline):** title/abstract/topics/conflicts final in
HotCRP. The abstract steers reviewer assignment; write it for bidding, not as a
placeholder.
- **P:** upload per `isca-submission`, then freeze the artifact snapshot that
matches the submitted numbers (`isca-reproducibility`).
## The winter: silence, then three loud weeks
Between November and mid-February the authors' only jobs are (a) keep the
evaluation environment resurrectable and (b) pre-build rebuttal ammunition: the
five most likely objections, each with a ready experiment or a pointer into the
submitted PDF. The 2026 cycle then opened a combined **rebuttal/revision period**
(February 16 - March 6) — unusually long by conference standards precisely because
ISCA lets authors *change the paper*, not just argue about it. Staff those three
weeks like a sprint: compute reserved, coauthors on call, no conference travel
booked. Details of what to do inside the window live in `isca-author-response`.
## Branch plans after notification
- **Accept:** camera-ready under the edition's publisher workflow
(`isca-camera-ready`), voluntary artifact submission (`isca-artifact-evaluation`),
talk and travel for late June.
- **Reject with salvageable reviews:** map every misunderstanding to the sentence
that permitted it; decide MICRO (spring gate) vs HPCA (summer gate) within two
weeks while the reviews are fresh.
- **Reject with a fit objection:** rerun `isca-topic-selection` honestly — the
committee may have told you the paper's true venue.
## Team ledger
Keep a single tracking file in the paper repo; every risk has one owner.
```yaml
# isca-campaign.yaml
target: ISCA 2027 # 54th by arithmetic - ordinal 待核实
gate:
abstract: TBD-2026-11 # confirm on iscaconf.org/isca2027 when live
paper: TBD-2026-11
source: "not yet posted as of 2026-07-08"
owners:
claim_and_story: <name> # one sentence, defended weekly
simulation_infra: <name> # versions pinned, configs archived
baselines: <name> # frozen P-10w, independently reproduced
writing: <name> # draft complete P-4w
submission_admin: <name> # HotCRP, conflicts, template, metadata
rebuttal_reserve: <name> # compute + calendar hold, mid-Feb to early Mar
checks:
- abstract written for reviewer bidding, not filler
- artifact snapshot tagged at submission commit
- mock-PC read completed and objections filed
- fallback venue named with trigger condition
```
## Failure modes this calendar prevents
- **The November collision:** abstract and paper a week apart means groups that
planned "we'll write after the abstract" write the whole paper in seven days.
The P-4w draft rule exists for this.
- **The dead environment:** rebuttal-window experiments that fail because the
simulator tree no longer builds in February. Tag and containerize at submission.
- **The unstaffed revision:** ISCA's revision option is leverage only for teams
that can produce new results in days; treat the window as scheduled work.
- **The stale retarget:** rejected papers resubmitted unchanged to MICRO carry
their ISCA reviews' fingerprints; committees overlap. Budget a real revision.
## Milestone-to-skill routing
| When you are at... | Open... |
|---|---|
| Venue decision (P-16w) | `isca-topic-selection`, exemplars library |
| Infrastructure setup | `isca-experiments`, `isca-reproducibility` |
| Drafting (P-6w to P-1w) | `isca-writing-style`, `isca-related-work`, `isca-supplementary` |
| Upload week | `isca-submission` (twice: abstract step, paper step) |
| Winter wait | `isca-review-process` |
| February window | `isca-author-response` |
| Post-decision | `isca-camera-ready`, `isca-artifact-evaluation`, or the retarget branch |
All dates above are the 2026-cycle record
(`../../resources/official-source-map.md`, checked 2026-07-08). Confirm the 2027
calendar, page rules, and review mechanics on the official site before acting on
any of them.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!