Use when planning an IROS project timeline from venue fit through the spring paper deadline, the separate video deadline, the summer review silence, the June notification, the July camera-ready, IEEE Xplore publication, registration, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for a real-robot paper on the fall IEEE/RSJ calendar.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iros-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Iros Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-iros-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: iros-workflow
description: Use when planning an IROS project timeline from venue fit through the spring paper deadline, the separate video deadline, the summer review silence, the June notification, the July camera-ready, IEEE Xplore publication, registration, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets for a real-robot paper on the fall IEEE/RSJ calendar.
---
# IROS Workflow
Use this as the project-management skill for an IROS submission. Replace every date with the current
official timetable and work backward from PaperPlaza cutoffs.
IROS is a conference, not a journal: it has no standing editor-in-chief and no article-processing charge.
It is **co-sponsored by IEEE RAS and the Robotics Society of Japan (RSJ)** — hence "IEEE/RSJ" — and the
organizing committee rotates yearly between regions, so re-check the current CFP and committee page
rather than carrying names or rules forward. The cost model is registration plus any per-page charge,
and proceedings go to IEEE Xplore.
## The fall-venue rhythm (2026 shape)
IROS is the **fall** IEEE-RAS mega-venue, the seasonal counterpart to ICRA's spring cycle. The 2026
edition ran a spring submission into an autumn conference:
- Paper deadline in **early spring** (2026: March 2).
- Video attachment a few days later (2026: March 5) — a distinct cutoff, not tied to the paper.
- A long **summer review silence**, then notification in **mid-June** (2026: June 16).
- **Camera-ready in July** (2026: July 10), then the conference in **late September/October** (2026:
Sept 27 - Oct 1, Pittsburgh).
Knowing you are on the fall calendar changes routing: a project that misses IROS's spring deadline has
CoRL and the next ICRA as nearer alternatives than waiting a full IROS year.
## Milestones
- Venue fit: confirm the contribution is an integrated intelligent system with credible robot evidence.
- Evidence lock: freeze the platform, task distribution, trial protocol, baselines, and the video plan.
- Paper deadline: upload the anonymous PDF (references counted in the page budget) and PaperPlaza fields.
- Video deadline: upload the ≤ 60 s / ≤ 10 MB attachment by its own cutoff.
- Review silence: nothing to do but keep the robot and logs intact for camera-ready.
- Notification: triage reviews; there is traditionally no rebuttal, so plan camera-ready edits instead.
- Camera-ready: de-anonymize, integrate meta-review asks, file the IEEE copyright form, register.
- Presentation: at least one author presents in person; prepare the talk and any live/updated video.
## Backward plan from the paper deadline
| Weeks out (heuristic) | Real-robot systems milestone |
|---|---|
| 10+ | Platform frozen; task distribution and success criterion defined |
| 8 | Baselines implemented on the same hardware for a fair comparison |
| 6 | Main trials run, resets logged, failures categorized |
| 4 | Sim-to-real study complete; the gap is a number, not a hope |
| 3 | Full draft in IEEE two-column format; references budgeted as content |
| 2 | Video footage banked from real sessions; rough 60 s cut assembled |
| 1 | Anonymity sweep across PDF, figures, and video; PaperPlaza PINs collected |
| 0 | Paper uploaded; video by its separate cutoff |
These offsets are planning heuristics only — anchor each to the current official timetable, never to a
previous cycle's calendar.
## Failure modes by stage
- Filming on deadline week produces worse footage and worse anonymity than banking clips all along.
- Treating references as free space overruns the budget, because IROS counts them in.
- Assuming a rebuttal exists wastes the notification window; IROS traditionally ships reviews with the
decision, so the only lever is camera-ready.
- Letting the robot get reconfigured before camera-ready makes a requested extra trial impossible.
## Coordination notes
- Assign one named owner for the video and one for the anonymity sweep; shared ownership is how both
slip.
- Archive the exact submitted PDF and video, since the camera-ready must trace to the reviewed version.
## Output format
```text
[Current stage] idea / experiments / writing / submission / video / review / notified / camera-ready
[Next official deadline] <date and source, or unknown>
[Critical path] <three tasks that determine readiness>
[Risk register] <page-budget/anonymity/robot-evidence/video/transfer>
[Owner map] <task -> person or role>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!