Use when strengthening IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI reproducibility evidence for theory, algorithms, datasets, and computational experiments under the official convincing/credible/irreproducible reviewer rubric and optional reproducibility-section guidance.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijcai-reproducibility --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ijcai Reproducibility?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ijcai-reproducibility)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ijcai-reproducibility
description: Use when strengthening IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI reproducibility evidence for theory, algorithms, datasets, and computational experiments under the official convincing/credible/irreproducible reviewer rubric and optional reproducibility-section guidance.
---
# IJCAI Reproducibility
Use this before submission and again before camera-ready. Reopen the current reproducibility
page; IJCAI's rubric and checklist can change.
## Evidence map
- Target at least a credible reproducibility rating for every major result; aim for
convincing when resources can be shared safely.
- For new algorithms, include a conceptual outline or pseudocode in the paper.
- For theory, state assumptions, formal claims, citations to tools, proof sketches, and
proofs for novel claims.
- For datasets, cite existing sources, describe unavailable or proprietary datasets, and
include or promise release of new datasets only when legally possible.
- For computational experiments, report final hyperparameters, search ranges, selection
criteria, seeds or repeat strategy, software versions, compute infrastructure, and runtime.
- Add an optional "Reproducibility" section when it resolves likely reviewer doubts, but do
not depend on supplementary material for central claims.
## Output format
```text
[Result inventory] <claim -> evidence location>
[Rubric target] convincing / credible / currently weak
[Missing details] <algorithm/theory/data/compute/hyperparameters/seeds>
[Paper fixes] <must be in main PDF>
[Supplement fixes] <optional or supporting evidence>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!