Use when positioning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI submission against archival AI literature, arXiv preprints, workshop papers, prior rejected versions, dual-submission rules, shortened prior versions, and resubmission-information requirements.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijcai-related-work --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ijcai Related Work?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ijcai-related-work)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ijcai-related-work
description: Use when positioning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI submission against archival AI literature, arXiv preprints, workshop papers, prior rejected versions, dual-submission rules, shortened prior versions, and resubmission-information requirements.
---
# IJCAI Related Work
Use this to audit novelty, prior work, and submission eligibility. Reopen the current CFP and
submissions FAQ because resubmission and dual-submission rules are policy-sensitive.
## Positioning checks
- Distinguish non-archival workshop or poster versions from formally published proceedings
with DOI, ISBN, or ISSN.
- If the paper was rejected by another peer-reviewed conference in the last 12 months,
prepare the required anonymized rejected version and reviews; the response cover letter may
be optional depending on current rules.
- Cite author preprints and prior work in third person. A non-anonymous arXiv version may be
allowed, but the IJCAI submission itself must remain anonymous.
- Do not submit a paper that is under review, accepted, or published at another formal
archival venue during the IJCAI review period.
- If a substantially shorter extended abstract, poster, or position paper exists, declare it
when current rules require and explain the new technical content.
- Make the related-work section decision-useful: closest competing claims, why they are
insufficient, and exactly what is new here.
## Output format
```text
[Eligibility] clear / needs declaration / risky
[Closest works] <3-5 items and distinction>
[Resubmission package] <needed/not needed/unknown>
[Dual-submission risk] <none/issues>
[Novelty sentence] <IJCAI-ready contribution contrast>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!