Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Gut

ASecurity

Use when targeting Gut (BMJ) or deciding whether a GI/hepatology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgoapiperformancedocumentation

Works with

cliapi

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gut --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Gut?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Gut
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-gut/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-gut)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: gut
description: Use when targeting Gut (BMJ) or deciding whether a GI/hepatology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
---

# Gut (gut)

## Journal positioning

Gut is published by BMJ and is the official journal of the British Society of Gastroenterology, with a scope that covers clinical gastroenterology, hepatology, and pancreatology alongside translational and mechanistic science. Compared with Gastroenterology (AGA), Gut carries a stronger clinical and epidemiological identity shaped by the BMJ culture of rigorous evidence-based medicine, open-data ethos, and methodological transparency — while also welcoming mechanistic studies that are closely tethered to clinically relevant disease processes. Hepatology occupies a larger share of Gut's pages than in most GI journals, reflecting the journal's BSG heritage and a strong liver disease community. The readership is international: European and global gastroenterologists, hepatologists, and GI researchers.

This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the BMJ / Gut author platform.

## When to trigger

- The author names Gut or the BSG as the target venue for a GI or hepatology manuscript.
- A GI/hepatology paper needs venue selection between Gut and Gastroenterology.
- A hepatology or clinical IBD paper with European epidemiology or registry data needs framing guidance.
- The author needs Gut's desk-reject risks and alternative venues before submitting.

## Scope & topic fit

- Clinical and epidemiological studies in inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's, ulcerative colitis), liver disease (NAFLD/MASH, hepatitis, cholestatic disease, cirrhosis complications), pancreatic disease, and GI cancer.
- Translational and mechanistic hepatology: liver fibrosis mechanisms, steatohepatitis pathogenesis, hepatocellular carcinoma biology — with human liver tissue, biopsy, or clinical cohort evidence as a primary layer.
- Gut microbiome studies with strong functional validation or direct clinical correlation (not purely descriptive composition); microbiota-drug, microbiota-host immunity, and microbiota-liver axis research.
- Clinical trials in GI medicine and hepatology (IBD therapies, antifibrotic strategies, liver cancer interventions) where the evidence has the potential to inform BSG or European clinical practice.
- GI cancer epidemiology, screening, and prevention at population scale; colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma risk-factor research.
- Endoscopy innovation where clinical performance is rigorously validated in prospective or randomized designs.

## Method & evidence bar

- Clinical and epidemiological studies must use validated exposure and outcome definitions, pre-specified analysis plans, and rigorous confounding control aligned with BMJ standards; retrospective audits without hypothesis framing are insufficient.
- Mechanistic and translational papers must include human tissue, clinical samples, or patient-level data as a central evidentiary layer — not merely supportive; pure animal-only or cell-only studies without human corroboration will not clear the bar.
- RCTs must be prospectively registered, CONSORT-compliant, and powered for a pre-specified primary endpoint; Gut follows the BMJ group's trial reporting expectations.
- Microbiome studies require pre-specified analytical pipelines, appropriate controls, functional validation (germ-free colonization, metabolomics, in vitro mechanistic assays), and data deposition in public repositories.
- Reporting guideline checklists (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD, ARRIVE) are required at submission; BMJ group journals check compliance rigorously.
- Open-data ethos: data availability statements are required; Gut strongly encourages open-access data sharing in line with BMJ policy.

## Structure & house style

- Structured abstract for clinical research (Objective / Design / Results / Conclusions); unstructured "Summary" for basic/translational papers — confirm current format.
- The introduction should frame the clinical or mechanistic gap relative to current clinical practice or guidelines; purely academic novelty framing without clinical relevance context is insufficient.
- Significance statement or "Significance of this study" box (What is already known / What are the new findings / How might this affect clinical practice) is a Gut-specific requirement for most article types — this must be filled with genuinely specific, non-generic content.
- Figures must be publication-quality; pathology, histology, and liver imaging figures should include scale bars and appropriate controls.
- Letters to the Editor and Brief Communications have strict length limits; re-check current specifications.
- BMJ Open Access options and hybrid licensing are available — re-check current APC and CC licensing details on the BMJ platform.

## Official-submission checklist

- Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and `../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked.
- Search the live site for "Gut author instructions" on the BMJ Journals / Gut platform and follow the current version.
- Re-check article-type classification (Original Article, Research Letter, Review, Editorial) and confirm current length and figure limits.
- Confirm trial or study pre-registration (ISRCTN, ClinicalTrials.gov, or equivalent); upload ethics/IRB and consent documentation per BMJ policy.
- Complete and upload the applicable reporting guideline checklist (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD, ARRIVE, or equivalent).
- Verify BMJ conflict-of-interest and funding disclosure requirements; confirm data-sharing statement is complete and explicit.
- Re-check microbiome or omics data deposition requirements (NCBI SRA, Zenodo, or equivalent) and accession number inclusion.
- Check "Significance of this study" box format specifications and completeness requirements.
- Confirm current AI-use disclosure policy and open-access/APC options.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

## Pre-submission self-check

- [ ] One sentence stating why this finding changes clinical understanding or practice in GI/hepatology in a way that matters to international clinicians.
- [ ] The "Significance of this study" box answers all three sub-questions with specific, not generic, content about this paper's contribution.
- [ ] Human tissue, clinical cohort, or patient-level data is a central evidentiary layer, not only a supplementary validation.
- [ ] The applicable reporting guideline checklist is complete; BMJ conflict-of-interest forms are ready for all authors.
- [ ] Data availability statement is explicit and data deposition accession numbers are included where applicable.
- [ ] The paper distinguishes its contribution clearly from Gastroenterology-published work in the same area; scope and framing reflect Gut's clinical/translational identity.

## Common desk-reject triggers

- Basic mechanistic studies (animal or cell models only) without human tissue, genetic, or clinical correlation as the primary evidentiary layer.
- Purely descriptive microbiome composition surveys without functional validation or clinical correlation.
- Small retrospective single-center audits or case series without a pre-specified clinical question or adequate controls.
- Missing or generic "Significance of this study" box — Gut editors check this as an early triage criterion.
- Incomplete reporting guideline checklist or absent trial registration; missing data-sharing statement.

## Re-routing decision

- A GI/hepatology mechanistic paper that has a stronger basic-science identity (deeper molecular biology, less clinical data) → `gastroenterology` (AGA; more tolerant of basic-science depth with translational relevance).
- A hepatology mechanistic paper with deep molecular/genetic mechanism and limited clinical epidemiology → `journal-of-clinical-investigation` or `hepatology`.
- A GI cancer biology paper with translational oncology framing → `cancer-discovery` (AACR) or `gastroenterology`.
- A global hepatitis or liver-disease epidemiology or clinical trial changing international practice → `the-lancet`, `nejm`, or `jama` if significance warrants that tier.

## Output format

```text
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Gut
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <does the human-data primary layer / Significance box / BMJ reporting standard clear the Gut bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / Significance box / CONSORT or equivalent / BMJ COI / data deposition / open-access options>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →