Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Gec Submission

ASecurity

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Global Environmental Change (GEC) via Editorial Manager — format selection, double-blind anonymization, word and abstract caps, Highlights, the Data Availability Statement, declarations, and ORCID. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-submission --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Gec Submission?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Gec Submission
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-gec-submission/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-gec-submission)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: gec-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Global Environmental Change (GEC) via Editorial Manager — format selection, double-blind anonymization, word and abstract caps, Highlights, the Data Availability Statement, declarations, and ORCID. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---

# Submission Preflight (gec-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on **Editorial Manager**. GEC is **double-blind** (verify), so a
common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript; the others are missing **Highlights** and a
missing **Data Availability Statement**. Verify volatile specifics on the official Guide for Authors —
several Elsevier pages return 403 to automated fetches, so some figures below are 待核实.

## When to trigger

- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata Editorial Manager expects
- Confirming caps are met and the manuscript is properly anonymized

## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

- **Publisher:** **Elsevier** (ISSN 0959-3780 print / 1872-9495 online).
- **Portal:** **Editorial Manager** (`editorialmanager.com/gec`).
- **Review model:** **double-blind** — anonymize the manuscript; provide a separate title page. 待核实.
- **Article length:** Research Articles **up to ~8,000 words** (incl. main text and table/figure
  captions, **excl.** references; longer occasionally if warranted). 待核实 on the exact cap.
- **Abstract:** **≤ ~250 words.** 待核实.
- **Highlights:** **3-5 bullets, ≤ ~85 characters each**, as a separate editable file. 待核实.
- **References:** current Elsevier style (numbered `elsarticle` vs. author-date) — confirm. 待核实.
- **Data:** Elsevier research-data policy; include a **Data Availability Statement**. 待核实 on level.
- **Fee:** subscription route (no author fee) or gold OA with an **APC** (quoted ~USD 6,120). 待核实.

## Preflight checklist

### Format & length
- [ ] Article type chosen and its word cap met (Research Article ~8,000 words, excl. refs)
- [ ] Abstract ≤ ~250 words; states problem + approach + finding + significance
- [ ] Highlights: 3-5 bullets, ≤ ~85 chars each, separate editable file

### Anonymity (double-blind)
- [ ] No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
- [ ] Self-citations neutralized; no obvious self-references
- [ ] Identifying **file metadata stripped** (document properties, comments)
- [ ] Separate (non-anonymous) title page prepared as a distinct file

### Format & metadata
- [ ] Elsevier formatting and reference style applied consistently
- [ ] Corresponding-author **ORCID** ready (Elsevier requirement)
- [ ] Figures/tables self-contained and accessible (see `gec-figures-and-tables`)

### Compliance & files
- [ ] **Declaration of competing interests** and any funding statement included
- [ ] Ethics / IRB / human-subjects compliance and consent where applicable
- [ ] **Data Availability Statement** + clean replication archive (data + code) staged
- [ ] Suggested reviewers (if requested) span the relevant disciplines

## Anti-patterns

- Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks double-blind)
- Abstract over the cap; missing or off-spec Highlights
- No Data Availability Statement; a results section the archive cannot reproduce
- Budgeting an APC when the subscription route is free to the author (verify)
- Sending a natural-science-only paper (see `gec-review-process` scope screen)

## Output format

```
【Article type】Research Article / Perspective / Review (caps met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤ ~250)
【Highlights】3-5 bullets, ≤85 chars each? [Y/N]
【Data Availability Statement + archive】[Y/N]
【Declarations + ORCID】[Y/N]
【Next】await decision → gec-revision-and-rebuttal on revision
```

## Supplementary resources

- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — reference managers, anonymization, and repository tooling
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official GEC URLs behind every fact in this pack

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →