Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Global Change Biology (GCB) via ScholarOne / Manuscript Central — article-type selection, word/abstract caps, graphical abstract, data availability statement, and required files. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gcb-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gcb Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-gcb-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gcb-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Global Change Biology (GCB) via ScholarOne / Manuscript Central — article-type selection, word/abstract caps, graphical abstract, data availability statement, and required files. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---
# Submission Preflight (gcb-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on **ScholarOne / Manuscript Central** (`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gcb`).
GCB desk-rejects heavily, so the preflight is about removing avoidable reasons to bounce: wrong scope
framing, missing graphical abstract, over-length text, or a non-compliant data statement. Verify
volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them (see 待核实 in the source map).
## When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata ScholarOne expects
- Confirming the chosen article type's caps and required elements are met
## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- **Publisher:** Wiley.
- **Portal:** **ScholarOne / Manuscript Central** (`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gcb`).
- **Article types:** Primary Research Article, Technical Advance, Review / Research Review (GCB Reviews
are invited), Opinion (~3,000–5,000 w) / Perspective (~1,500 w) — confirm full list (待核实).
- **Length:** research articles up to **~15,000 words incl. references** in one rendering; a **~8,000-word**
framing also appears — confirm current cap and what it includes (待核实).
- **Abstract:** **~300 words** (one rendering says 250); **6–10 keywords** (待核实).
- **Graphical abstract:** **required** — depicts the driver-to-response mechanism.
- **Data/code:** **data availability statement** required; data and code archived with a **DOI** as a
condition of publication ("available on request" not accepted).
- **Review model:** generally single-anonymous (待核实).
## Preflight checklist
### Article type & length
- [ ] Article type chosen and its word cap met (confirm current cap; 待核实)
- [ ] Abstract within cap (~300 words; 待核实), states aim + approach + quantified result + conclusion
- [ ] 6–10 keywords
### Required elements
- [ ] **Graphical abstract** showing driver → response mechanism
- [ ] **Data availability statement** naming repository + access (not "on request")
- [ ] Data and code archived (or staged) with a DOI per policy (see `gcb-reporting-and-data-policy`)
- [ ] Figures/tables self-contained and accessible (see `gcb-figures-and-tables`)
### Format & metadata
- [ ] Manuscript formatted per current GCB/Wiley template; author-date citations consistent
- [ ] Cover letter establishes scope fit + advance (see `gcb-cover-letter`)
- [ ] Author list, ORCID, affiliations, conflicts, and funding complete
- [ ] Ethics / permits / sampling compliance stated where applicable
## Anti-patterns
- Missing or non-mechanistic graphical abstract (site map / phylogeny)
- "Data available on request" instead of a DOI deposit (rejected)
- Over-length manuscript or an abstract over the cap
- Wrong scope framing (local/conservation) that invites a desk reject
- Submitting an unsolicited "GCB Review" (use Research Reviews)
## Output format
```
【Article type】… (cap met? confirm current cap — 待核实) [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (~300; 待核实) + 6–10 keywords
【Graphical abstract】driver → response present? [Y/N]
【Data statement + DOI deposit】names repo, not "on request"? [Y/N]
【Cover letter + metadata】scope fit, ORCID, conflicts complete? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → gcb-revision-and-rebuttal on revision
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — submission portal, repositories, reference/template tooling
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official GCB URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!