Use when deciding whether an agronomy or crop-science project fits Field Crops Research (FCR) and which article type to target. FCR's defining test is field-based agronomic significance with multi-season/-environment relevance — it rejects controlled-environment-only, single-site single-season, horticultural/woody-perennial, and corroborative/descriptive/local-only work. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill fcr-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Fcr Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-fcr-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: fcr-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether an agronomy or crop-science project fits Field Crops Research (FCR) and which article type to target. FCR's defining test is field-based agronomic significance with multi-season/-environment relevance — it rejects controlled-environment-only, single-site single-season, horticultural/woody-perennial, and corroborative/descriptive/local-only work. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
---
# Topic Selection & Scope Fit (fcr-topic-selection)
FCR is a **field-agronomy** journal. The bar is not "a new result in my plot" — it is **"a field-based
insight of general relevance to field crops."** Use this skill to pressure-test fit **before** you
invest, because FCR's scope boundary is strict and a mismatch is a fast desk rejection.
## When to trigger
- Choosing among possible projects or framings for an FCR submission
- A reviewer/colleague said the work feels "controlled-environment," "too local," or "descriptive"
- Deciding between an **Original Research Paper** and a **Short Communication**
- Considering a **Review** or **Opinion** piece (propose to the Editors-in-Chief first)
## The FCR scope gate (must clear all four)
1. **Field-based.** Conducted in the field, not **exclusively** under controlled conditions
(greenhouse, pots, or **any system that constricts root growth**). A controlled-environment
component is fine only when integrated with, and subordinate to, field results.
2. **Multi-season / multi-environment relevance.** Field experiments should, unless exceptional
circumstances apply, span **at least two seasons and/or multiple locations/environments**. A
single-site, single-season trial usually fails the gate.
3. **A field crop.** Crops grown for **food, fibre, feed, or biofuel**. **Out of scope:**
horticultural (vegetable/fruit) species, woody perennials, medicinal and non-cultivated species,
and natural grasslands.
4. **General significance, not local/descriptive.** Must show **new scientific insight, original
technology, or a novel method** of general application — not corroborative, purely descriptive, or
of only local interest.
## Frame the agronomic contribution
| Angle | Make it FCR-worthy by… |
|-------|------------------------|
| Yield / yield gap | quantify the gap vs. potential/water-limited yield and what closes it |
| Crop physiology | connect a process (RUE, WUE, partitioning, phenology) to yield formation |
| Agronomy / management | show a management response that travels across environments, with G×E×M |
| Cropping systems | demonstrate system-level effects (rotation, intercrop, residue) over seasons |
| Crop modelling | calibrate/validate against field data and use the model to generalise beyond the sites |
Including **yield data** is encouraged — it ties the work to the biophysical processes FCR cares about.
## Article-type choice
- **Original Research Paper** — full field/modelling study, multi-environment, general relevance.
- **Short Communication** — one complete, focused finding that will not be part of a later paper.
- **Review** — critical synthesis; normally invited, but send a brief proposal/outline to the
Editors-in-Chief first.
- **Opinion Paper** — a reasoned perspective on an issue in field-crop science.
- **Loomis Review** — major review by invitation only.
## Anti-patterns
- A pot/greenhouse-only study dressed up as agronomy (out of scope)
- "First time measured in my region" as the whole contribution (local/descriptive)
- One season at one site with no path to multi-environment relevance
- A horticultural, woody-perennial, or non-cultivated species (wrong journal)
- A result with no yield or biophysical-process link
## Output format
```
【Question】one sentence
【Scope gate】field-based? ≥2 seasons/envs? field crop? more than local? [pass/fix each]
【Agronomic contribution】yield / physiology / management / systems / modelling
【Article type】Original Research / Short Communication / Review / Opinion / Loomis Review
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】fcr-literature-positioning
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — agronomy data sources and crop models
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — FCR scope and the explicit exclusions
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!