Use when deciding whether an econometrics paper fits The Econometrics Journal's leading-case, applied-value bar rather than Journal of Econometrics, Econometric Theory, Quantitative Economics, Review of Economics and Statistics, or a field journal.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ectj-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ectj Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ectj-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ectj-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether an econometrics paper fits The Econometrics Journal's leading-case, applied-value bar rather than Journal of Econometrics, Econometric Theory, Quantitative Economics, Review of Economics and Statistics, or a field journal.
---
# EctJ Topic Selection
Use this before drafting. EctJ is not a generic repository for any econometric technique; it
asks for original econometrics with direct or potential applied value and a leading-case
contribution.
## Fit test
- Prefer EctJ when the paper gives a path-breaking or leading-case method, estimator, test,
identification result, or applied-econometrics design that can travel beyond one narrow
dataset.
- Require an empirical application even for theory papers; do not treat Monte Carlo evidence
as a substitute for applied relevance.
- Route to Econometric Theory if the contribution is almost entirely formal and needs longer
theorem development.
- Route to Journal of Econometrics if the paper is broader, longer, or more exhaustive than
EctJ's compact format supports.
- Route to a field journal if the econometric novelty is mainly a tool for a substantive
economics result.
## Output format
```text
[Fit] strong EctJ / possible EctJ / better elsewhere
[Leading case] <methodological or applied-econometrics advance>
[Applied value] <empirical domain and why it matters>
[Routing risk] <too narrow, too theoretical, too empirical, too long>
[Next action] <theory, application, framing, or venue switch>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!