Use for the exhibits in an Econometric Theory (ET) paper — Monte Carlo size/power/coverage tables, finite-sample and limit-behavior plots, with self-contained notes, ET figure-format specs (TIFF/EPS/PDF), and legibility at 50% reduction.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ectheory-tables-figures --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ectheory Tables Figures?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ectheory-tables-figures)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ectheory-tables-figures
description: Use for the exhibits in an Econometric Theory (ET) paper — Monte Carlo size/power/coverage tables, finite-sample and limit-behavior plots, with self-contained notes, ET figure-format specs (TIFF/EPS/PDF), and legibility at 50% reduction.
---
# Tables & Figures (ectheory-tables-figures)
## When to trigger
- Turning Monte Carlo output into publication tables (size, power, coverage, bias, RMSE)
- Building plots of finite-sample distributions, convergence to the limit, or rejection curves
- Preparing figure files to ET's format and resolution specs
- Checking that exhibits are self-contained and legible after print reduction
## What ET exhibits look like
ET is a theory journal, so most exhibits are **simulation tables and diagnostic plots that
illustrate the asymptotics**, not empirical-result tables. Common exhibits:
- **Size/power tables** — empirical rejection rates under the null (vs nominal level) and under
alternatives, across DGPs and sample sizes.
- **Coverage / bias / RMSE tables** — for estimators, across n and DGP, against a benchmark method.
- **Distribution / convergence plots** — empirical vs limiting density (e.g., normal, mixed-normal,
Brownian functional); QQ plots; rejection curves as a function of the alternative.
- **Rate plots** — a statistic against n on a scale that reveals the convergence rate.
## Construction standards
- **Self-contained notes.** Each table/figure note states the DGP, sample sizes, number of
replications, nominal level, and what each column/curve is — readable without the main text.
- **Honest contrast.** Put your method beside the natural competitor in the same table; do not hide
the comparison.
- **Legibility.** Exhibits must be legible at **50% reduction**; avoid chartjunk, 3D, and dense
color. Keep table precision sensible (e.g., 3 decimals for rejection rates).
- **Figure files (ET specs).** Supply **TIFF** (line art >=600 dpi, greyscale >=300 dpi), **EPS**
(fonts embedded), or **PDF**. Embed fonts; vector output for line art.
- **Numbering.** Tables and figures numbered and called out in order in the text.
## Checklist
- [ ] Each exhibit note states DGP, n, replications, nominal level, and column/curve definitions
- [ ] Size reported against the nominal level; power against stated alternatives
- [ ] Benchmark method shown alongside, not omitted
- [ ] Plots show convergence/limit behavior clearly; rate legible where claimed
- [ ] Legible at 50% reduction; no chartjunk; sensible decimal precision
- [ ] Figure files in TIFF/EPS/PDF with fonts embedded, at required resolution
- [ ] All exhibits numbered and referenced in order
## Anti-patterns
- A size table without the nominal level, so over-/under-rejection cannot be judged
- Notes that require the reader to hunt through the text to decode the columns
- Cherry-picked DGPs hiding the regime where the method underperforms
- Raster figures at low dpi that blur at print reduction
- 3D bars or rainbow palettes obscuring a simple size/power comparison
## Output format
```
【Exhibit】size / power / coverage / bias-RMSE / distribution / rate plot
【Self-contained note】DGP + n + reps + level stated? [Y/N]
【Benchmark shown】[Y/N]
【Legible at 50%】[Y/N]
【File format】TIFF / EPS / PDF, fonts embedded? [Y/N]
【Next step】ectheory-writing-style
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!