Use when starting or navigating any Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing a manuscript length tier or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and by the developmental design (cross-sectional, longitudinal/cohort, micro-genetic, experiment with minors); it dispatches, it does not draft content.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Devpsych Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-devpsych-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: devpsych-workflow
description: Use when starting or navigating any Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing a manuscript length tier or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and by the developmental design (cross-sectional, longitudinal/cohort, micro-genetic, experiment with minors); it dispatches, it does not draft content.
---
# Developmental Psychology Workflow Router (devpsych-workflow)
The orchestrator for a Developmental Psychology submission. This APA journal publishes empirical work on
**development across the life span**, and its defining demand is a credible claim about **developmental
change** — age effects, within-person change, or trajectories — reported under **APA 7th + JARS**, with
**masked review** and **Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP)** expectations. The router makes sure
the developmental claim, the design, and the open-science package are all handled, then dispatches.
## When to trigger
- Starting a new Developmental Psychology paper and unsure where to begin
- Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
- Choosing a length tier (brief report vs. larger report vs. multi-study/longitudinal report)
- Returning with a decision letter (route to `devpsych-rebuttal`)
## First question: what kind of developmental claim and design?
| Situation | Design | Route note |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| Age differences at one time point | **Cross-sectional** | name the age/cohort confound early (`devpsych-study-design`) |
| Within-person change over time | **Longitudinal / cohort** | attrition + measurement invariance are load-bearing |
| Process of change in close-up | **Micro-genetic** | dense sampling; justify granularity |
| Causal manipulation with minors | **Experiment** | ethics/assent + age-appropriate task validity |
| Re-using a large panel (e.g., NICHD, ECLS) | **Secondary analysis** | declare provenance, derived measures, version |
## Routing map (stage → skill)
```text
Idea / fit + age scope? → devpsych-topic-selection
Developmental theory + hypotheses? → devpsych-theory-and-hypotheses
Where does it sit in the field? → devpsych-literature-positioning
Design / power / invariance / age? → devpsych-study-design
Growth-curve / multilevel / SEM? → devpsych-data-analysis
Trajectory exhibits (APA)? → devpsych-tables-figures
APA 7th + Public Significance? → devpsych-writing-style
Data/materials + preregistration? → devpsych-open-science-and-transparency
How will it be judged (masked)? → devpsych-review-process
Ready to submit (Editorial Mgr)? → devpsych-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → devpsych-rebuttal
```
## Default order
`topic-selection → theory-and-hypotheses → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis →
tables-figures → writing-style → open-science-and-transparency → review-process → submission → rebuttal`
If the design is **prospective and confirmatory**, pull `study-design` and `open-science-and-transparency`
forward so a preregistration and a sample-size justification exist *before* data collection.
## Worked micro-example — routing a live project (illustrative)
A team has a three-wave accelerated longitudinal study of self-regulation (ages 4, 6, 8; some attrition),
fitting growth curves, and a reviewer-anticipated worry about measurement invariance. The router walks them:
```
Claim: within-person growth in effortful control, age 4→8.
Design: longitudinal/cohort (accelerated) → invariance + attrition are central.
Entry: not idea-stage; they are at design hardening + analysis.
Route: study-design (invariance test plan; attrition/FIML; age-vs-cohort)
→ data-analysis (latent growth / multilevel; time coding)
→ tables-figures (spaghetti + mean-trajectory plot, CIs)
→ writing-style (APA 7th; Public Significance Statement)
→ open-science-and-transparency (data/scripts; prereg if confirmatory)
→ submission (masked preflight) ; on R&R → rebuttal.
Flag: test longitudinal measurement invariance BEFORE interpreting change.
```
## Stage-triage table (symptom → skill)
| What the author says | Stage | Route to |
|----------------------|-------|----------|
| "Is age difference enough, or do I need change?" | fit | `devpsych-topic-selection` |
| "Reviewer: is your construct the same at every age?" | design/analysis | `devpsych-study-design` + `devpsych-data-analysis` |
| "Cross-sectional age effect — but is it cohort?" | design | `devpsych-study-design` |
| "Where does the Public Significance Statement go?" | writing | `devpsych-writing-style` |
| "Do I need to share data and preregister?" | transparency | `devpsych-open-science-and-transparency` |
| "I have an R&R" | revision | `devpsych-rebuttal` |
## Routing pitfalls specific to this venue
- Sending an age-comparison straight to `devpsych-data-analysis` without first separating **age from
cohort** and confirming **measurement invariance** — the change claim collapses if the construct shifts.
- Deferring `devpsych-open-science-and-transparency`; under TOP, deposits and a preregistration are far
cheaper to build before data than to retrofit at acceptance.
## Anti-patterns
- Treating a cross-sectional age difference as developmental change without addressing cohort confounds
- Interpreting trajectories before establishing longitudinal measurement invariance
- Forgetting the Public Significance Statement (an APA requirement on the abstract page)
- Ignoring masked-review anonymization in the manuscript or in shared links
## Output format
```
【Stage】idea / theory / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Design】cross-sectional / longitudinal-cohort / micro-genetic / experiment / secondary
【Route to】devpsych-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — longitudinal/SEM tooling, power, preregistration, developmental data archives
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Developmental Psychology URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!