Generate Beamer presentations for the sewage-house-prices project by dispatching the Storyteller agent (creator) and Discussant agent (critic). Supports 4 formats — job market, seminar, short, lightning. Derives all content from the paper.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill create-talk --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Create Talk?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-create-talk)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: create-talk
description: Generate Beamer presentations for the sewage-house-prices project by dispatching the Storyteller agent (creator) and Discussant agent (critic). Supports 4 formats — job market, seminar, short, lightning. Derives all content from the paper.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[format: job-market | seminar | short | lightning] [paper path (optional)]"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Edit", "Task", "Bash"]
---
# Create Talk
Generate a Beamer presentation by dispatching the **Storyteller** (creator) and **Discussant** (critic).
**Input:** `$ARGUMENTS` — format name, optionally followed by paper path.
---
## Workflow
### Step 1: Parse Arguments
- **Format** (required): `job-market` | `seminar` | `short` | `lightning`
- **Paper path** (optional): defaults to `docs/overleaf/_main.tex`
- If no format specified, ask the user.
### Format Constraints
| Format | Slides | Duration | Content Scope |
|--------|--------|----------|---------------|
| Job market | 40-50 | 45-60 min | Full story, all results, mechanism, robustness |
| Seminar | 25-35 | 30-45 min | Motivation, main result, 2 robustness, conclusion |
| Short | 10-15 | 15 min | Question, method, key result, implication |
| Lightning | 3-5 | 5 min | Hook, one result, so-what |
### Step 2: Launch Storyteller Agent
Delegate to the `storyteller` agent via Task tool:
```
Prompt: Create a [format] talk from [paper].
Read the paper (docs/overleaf/_main.tex) and extract:
- Research question: causal effect of sewage spills on house prices and rents in England
- Data: EDM (Event Duration Monitoring) spill records 2021-2024+, Land Registry prices, Zoopla rentals
- Identification strategy: hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD/event study
- Spatial matching: spill sites within radius (250m–10km) linked to properties
- Key treatment variables: spill_count, spill_hrs, n_spill_sites, min_dist
- Main results and effect sizes (house prices and rents separately)
- Robustness checks: upstream/downstream, dry spill placebo, rainfall controls
- Institutional context: England's water companies, EDM permit system, regulatory failure
- Key figures: output/figures/, docs/overleaf/figures/, docs/overleaf/maps/
Design narrative arc for [format] format.
Build Beamer .tex file with shared preamble if available.
Compile with XeLaTeX.
Save to docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex
```
The Storyteller follows these principles:
- One idea per slide
- Figures > tables (tables in backup); prefer maps and scatter plots from output/figures/
- Build tension: motivation (regulatory failure) → question → EDM data → method → findings → policy implications
- Transition slides between major sections
- All claims must appear in the paper (single source of truth)
- Treatment variable definitions (12/24hr counting) explained clearly on methods slide
### Step 3: Launch Discussant Agent (Talk Critic)
After Storyteller returns, delegate to the `discussant` agent:
```
Prompt: Review the talk at docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex.
Check 5 categories:
1. Narrative flow — does the story build properly from EDM data → identification → results?
2. Visual quality — overflow, readability, consistency
3. Content fidelity — every claim (coefficient, standard error, N) traceable to paper
4. Scope for format — right amount of content for duration
5. Compilation — does it compile cleanly?
Score as advisory (non-blocking).
Save report to docs/conferences/quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md
```
### Step 4: Fix Critical Issues
If Discussant finds Critical issues (compilation failures, content not in paper):
1. Re-dispatch Storyteller with specific fixes (max 3 rounds)
2. Re-run Discussant to verify
### Step 5: Present Results
1. Generated `.tex` file path
2. Slide count and format compliance
3. Discussant score (advisory, non-blocking)
4. TODO items (missing figures, tables not yet generated)
---
## Output
Save to `docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex` (e.g., `docs/conferences/seminar_talk.tex`).
Quality report to `docs/conferences/quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md`.
---
## Principles
- **Paper is authoritative.** Every claim must appear in `docs/overleaf/_main.tex`.
- **Less is more.** Especially for short and lightning — ruthlessly cut.
- **Audience calibration.** Job market = identification rigor. Seminar = interesting result. Lightning = sell the idea.
- **Advisory scoring.** Talk scores don't block commits.
- **Worker-critic pairing.** Storyteller creates, Discussant critiques. Never skip the review.
- **Figures first.** Prefer maps (docs/overleaf/maps/), event study plots, and scatter plots over regression tables.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!