Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Cre Literature Review

ASecurity

Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical 三农 theory references are missing.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/4/2026
ai-agents

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/4/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cre-literature-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cre Literature Review?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cre Literature Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: cre-literature-review
description: Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical 三农 theory references are missing.
---

# 中国农村经济文献综述(cre-literature-review)

## 触发时机

- 综述缺三农领域中文经典,或全部是英文文献
- 综述缺**理论文献**(农户行为、土地制度、契约组织等理论根基)
- 综述写成了"罗列式"而非"对话式"

## 结构规范

《中国农村经济》偏好**三层结构**的综述:

1. **第一层:理论文献**(中外并重)——建立问题的理论坐标(如农户行为理论、诱致性制度变迁、契约理论、发展经济学)
2. **第二层:三农领域实证文献**(中文为主、英文为辅)——梳理已有的农村微观实证发现
3. **第三层:本文位置**——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异",尤其是相对于本刊与姊妹刊《中国农村观察》近年同主题文章的差异

### 与综合经济学期刊综述的差异

《中国农村经济》尤其看重**三农领域文献是否到位**:既要有国际理论与方法文献,也要充分对话国内农经学界的权威研究。一篇只引国际顶刊、不引国内农经经典的稿件,会被审稿人认为"未扎根本土文献"。

## 中外文献配比

经验法则(具体不必拘泥,导向是"中外并重 + 理论扎实"):

- 总引文 40–80 条(投稿前请到官网"投稿须知"核对当年参考文献条数上限)
- 中文文献占比 **40%–60%**(三农领域本土实证不能缺位)
- **理论文献占比 ≥ 20%**(理论推导 / 综述,不是实证应用)
- 五年内文献占比 **≥ 40%**
- 既覆盖国际顶刊(AJAE / AER / JDE / Food Policy 等),也覆盖国内权威(《经济研究》《管理世界》《中国农村经济》《中国农村观察》《农业经济问题》等)

## 必引避坑清单

- [ ] 是否引用了所属理论分支的**经典理论文献**(农户行为 / 土地制度 / 契约组织 / 发展经济学的原始 paper)?
- [ ] 是否引用了**三农领域的中文权威研究**(不是只引国际文献)?
- [ ] 是否引用了近 3 年本刊或《中国农村观察》的同主题论文?
- [ ] 引用是否覆盖三类:理论、方法、本土三农实证?
- [ ] 是否避免了"自引扎堆"?

## 综述句式模板

```
[作者 (年份)] 利用[农户 / 村级数据 + 方法]研究了[三农问题],发现……。
然而,该研究[局限],未考虑[本文要补的空白,如农户自选择 / 区域异质 / 机制]。
与之相比,本文……。
```

每段综述至少出现一次"与之相比 / 区别于 / 本文延伸了 / 本文补充了"。

## 对话式 vs 罗列式

《中国农村经济》偏好**对话式**综述(研究之间相互回应),而非**罗列式**(按作者顺序点名)。

### 错误(罗列式)

> 张三(2020)研究了土地流转,李四(2021)研究了农户增收,王五(2022)研究了合作社。

### 正确(对话式 — 按主题分组、表明分歧、给出本文位置)

> 土地流转能否提升农户收入,已有研究存在分歧(张三,2020;李四,2021):一类研究认为流转通过规模经营提高生产率,另一类则强调流转中的契约不完全限制了增收效果。两类判断的差异部分源于对农户自选择的处理不同。本文沿这一思路,使用[数据]并构造[识别策略],进一步考察了……。

判断标准:把作者名都隐去后,综述还能读出"研究 A 怎么说、研究 B 怎么反驳、本文怎么定位",就是对话式。

## 与本文贡献阐述衔接

综述末尾必须导出本文的差异化定位,模板:

> 本文与现有文献的重要区别体现在以下几个方面:
> 第一,[识别策略上的差异——如何处理农户自选择 / 政策内生];
> 第二,[数据或样本上的差异——更新 / 更细的农户或村级数据];
> 第三,[机制或异质性上的差异]。
> 与本刊(或《中国农村观察》)近期发表的 XXX(作者,202X)一文相比,本文 ……

**与本刊及姊妹刊已发表文章对比**是审稿人的关注点——综述若不提近 3 年两刊同主题文章,会被视为"未充分对话"。

## 反模式

- 把综述写成"三农政策背景介绍"而非学术对话
- 综述完全围绕国际文献,无国内三农权威研究
- 中文文献只引一两条凑数
- 综述里出现一长串并列引用 —— 拆开按贡献分述
- 自引扎堆

## 输出格式

```
【结构】三层 / 两层 / 一层
【中外配比】中文 X% / 英文 Y%
【理论文献占比】X%
【三农本土权威文献】到位 / 缺位
【五年内文献比例】X%
【缺漏清单】[...]
【下一步】cre-identification
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →