Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Cpa Literature Review

ASecurity

Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript, when the public-administration theory anchor is missing, or when the Chinese-governance / international-PA reference balance is off.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/4/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/4/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cpa-literature-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cpa Literature Review?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cpa Literature Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-cpa-literature-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-cpa-literature-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: cpa-literature-review
description: Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript, when the public-administration theory anchor is missing, or when the Chinese-governance / international-PA reference balance is off.
---

# 中国行政管理文献综述(cpa-literature-review)

## 触发时机

- 综述缺**公共管理理论文献**(《中国行政管理》审稿人最常挑这一点)
- 综述只有中国经验文献、没有国际公共管理理论坐标,或反之
- 综述写成了"罗列式"而非"对话式"

## 结构规范

《中国行政管理》偏好**三层结构**的综述:

1. **第一层:理论文献**——建立问题的公共管理理论坐标(治理、政策过程、官僚行为、央地关系等经典与近年发展)
2. **第二层:经验 / 实践文献**——梳理已有针对该议题的中国治理经验研究与国际比较研究
3. **第三层:本文位置**——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"以及补的空白

### 与经济学期刊综述的差异

《中国行政管理》看重**公共管理理论是否到位**,而非经济学理论或纯计量文献。一篇研究政策执行却不引李普斯基(街头官僚)、马特兰德(模糊—冲突模型)、普雷斯曼-威尔达夫斯基(执行)等执行研究脉络,或研究治理却不引奥斯特罗姆、罗茨 / 治理网络脉络的稿件,会被审稿人挑出。

## 中外文献与新旧配比

经验法则(以官网当年要求为准,不强求固定条数):

- **公共管理理论文献必须到位**:所属理论分支的经典原始文献,不能只引教科书或综述
- 中外文献**并重**:既要有国际公共管理理论坐标,也要有中国治理本土文献
- 党政政策语境文献**适度纳入**:与议题相关的重要政策文件、权威表述可作为现实背景引用,但不能用政策文件替代学术文献
- 近年文献占比足够,体现对学术前沿的跟踪
- 避免"自引扎堆"(自引宜少)

## 必引避坑清单

- [ ] 是否引用了所属理论分支的**经典原始文献**?(治理 / 政策过程 / 官僚行为脉络)
- [ ] 是否引用了近年公共管理顶刊 / 权威期刊的同主题论文?
- [ ] 是否引用了相关的**中国治理本土研究**?
- [ ] 引用是否覆盖三类:理论、方法、本土经验 / 政策语境?
- [ ] 是否避免了用政策文件堆砌替代学术对话?

## 综述句式模板

```
[作者 (年份)] 基于[数据 / 案例 / 视角]研究了[问题],认为……。
然而,该研究[局限],未关注[本文要补的空白]。
与之相比,本文从[理论框架]出发……。
```

每段综述至少出现一次"与之相比 / 区别于 / 本文延伸了 / 本文补充了"。

## 对话式 vs 罗列式

《中国行政管理》偏好**对话式**综述(研究之间相互回应),而非**罗列式**(按作者顺序点名)。

### 错误(罗列式)

> 张三(2020)研究了政策执行,李四(2021)研究了央地关系,王五(2022)研究了基层治理。

### 正确(对话式 — 按主题分组、表明分歧、给出本文位置)

> 政策执行偏差的成因,文献存在两种解释路径:一类强调自上而下的目标模糊与激励扭曲(张三,2020),另一类强调街头官僚的自由裁量(李四,2021)。两者分歧在于偏差的主导动力来自结构还是行动者。少数研究尝试整合两条路径(王五,2022),但其证据局限于单一案例。本文沿这一思路,结合 X 与 Y,进一步考察了 Z。

判断标准:把作者名都隐去后,综述还能读出"研究 A 怎么说、研究 B 怎么反驳、本文怎么定位",就是对话式。

## 与本文贡献阐述衔接

综述末尾必须导出本文的差异化定位:

> 本文与现有文献的重要区别体现在:
> 第一,[理论框架上的差异];
> 第二,[研究设计 / 资料上的差异];
> 第三,[机制或情境上的差异]。

## 反模式

- 把综述写成"教科书式知识介绍"或概念辨析堆砌
- 通篇只有中国经验文献,缺国际公共管理理论坐标(或反之)
- 用大段政策文件原文替代学术文献对话
- 综述里出现 5 个并列引用并排堆砌 —— 拆开按贡献分述
- 引述了治理 / 政策过程的"名词",却没引相应的经典脉络

## 输出格式

```
【结构】三层 / 两层 / 一层
【理论锚定】到位(已引经典)/ 缺失
【中外配比】中文偏多 / 英文偏多 / 均衡
【政策语境处理】恰当 / 喧宾夺主
【缺漏清单】[...]
【下一步】cpa-identification
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →