Use when planning a CoRL submission cycle end to end — the late-May abstract and paper deadlines, the summer review window, first-round rejection risk, the August one-page rebuttal and discussion period, autumn decisions, the October PMLR camera-ready, and the November conference — including what to do between milestones.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill corl-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Corl Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-corl-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: corl-workflow
description: Use when planning a CoRL submission cycle end to end — the late-May abstract and paper deadlines, the summer review window, first-round rejection risk, the August one-page rebuttal and discussion period, autumn decisions, the October PMLR camera-ready, and the November conference — including what to do between milestones.
---
# CoRL Workflow
CoRL runs one cycle per year on a spring-submit / autumn-decide / November-meet
rhythm. This skill turns the 2026 calendar (verified 2026-07-08 via corl.org,
OpenReview, and the conference's public timeline) into a working plan, including
what a team should be doing *right now* in each phase.
## The 2026 cycle as a reference timeline
| Milestone | CoRL 2026 date | Status on 2026-07-08 |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract registration | May 26, 2026 | passed |
| Paper + supplementary deadline | May 29, 2026 | passed |
| Review period (reviewers, ACs, SACs) | June – early August 2026 | **in progress** |
| Reviews released / first-round rejections | early August 2026 [exact date 待核实] | upcoming |
| One-page PDF rebuttal due | August 11, 2026, 11:59 PM AoE | upcoming |
| Reviewer–AC discussion window | August 12–19, 2026 | upcoming |
| Decision notification | September 2026 [exact date 待核实] | upcoming |
| Camera-ready to PMLR pipeline | October 12, 2026, 23:59 AoE | upcoming |
| Conference (JW Marriott, Austin, TX) | November 9–12, 2026 (workshops Nov 9) | upcoming |
Every date above is a single cycle's snapshot. The 2027 cycle will publish its own
timeline at the corl.org year-site; nothing here transfers automatically.
## Phase playbooks
### Now: the submitted-paper quiet period (June–July)
- **Do not update the OpenReview PDF** — the submission is frozen; focus energy on
experiments you may need for the rebuttal instead.
- Pre-build rebuttal ammunition: the most predictable reviewer asks at CoRL are
more seeds, more evaluation episodes, a missing robot-learning baseline, and a
real-robot check for a sim-heavy paper. Run these *before* reviews land; the
window between reviews and the August 11 rebuttal deadline is days, not weeks.
- Keep the anonymized project site (if any) untouched and unlinked from any
identity; review is double-anonymous until decisions.
- Decide the fallback venue now (see `corl-topic-selection`), so a first-round
rejection in early August converts to a resubmission plan the same week.
### Reviews land (early August)
- Triage against the first-round rejection rule first: in the 2026 process, a paper
with no score of weak-accept-or-above from any reviewer or the AC is a candidate
for rejection **without rebuttal**. If you are past that gate, the rebuttal is
live — switch to `corl-author-response` immediately.
- Map each concern to: (a) already answered in the paper, (b) answerable with a
prepared experiment, (c) requires concession. One page forces this triage anyway.
### Rebuttal through decision (mid-August – September)
- Submit the one-page PDF by August 11, 11:59 PM AoE; then remain reachable — the
reviewer–AC discussion (Aug 12–19) can surface follow-ups, and reviewers are
asked to update scores when a rebuttal warrants it.
- Decisions are finalized in SAC–AC meetings and a final SACs–PCs meeting; there is
no author-visible activity in that stage, so use September for the camera-ready
or resubmission branch prep.
### Acceptance branch (September – November)
- Camera-ready: 9-page main text (one page more than submission, explicitly to
absorb review feedback), `\usepackage[final]{corl_2026}`, appendix merged into
the same PDF, due October 12, 23:59 AoE — see `corl-camera-ready`.
- Remember that reviews and rebuttals of accepted papers are made public: write the
camera-ready knowing the exchange will be readable next to it.
- Book Austin early; plan the poster/talk material and the public code release
(`corl-artifact-evaluation`) in parallel, not sequentially.
## Team calendar template
```yaml
# corl-cycle-plan.yaml — assign an owner and a date to every row
paper_id: ""
phase_now: post-submission # update as the cycle advances
rebuttal_prep:
extra_seeds_run: {owner: , status: } # started before reviews arrive
missing_baseline: {owner: , status: }
real_robot_spotcheck: {owner: , status: }
one_page_template_ready: {owner: , status: } # LaTeX skeleton compiled
dates_to_watch:
reviews_released: "early Aug 2026 (待核实 — watch OpenReview + corl.org)"
rebuttal_due: "2026-08-11 23:59 AoE"
discussion: "2026-08-12..19"
decision: "Sep 2026 (待核实)"
camera_ready: "2026-10-12 23:59 AoE"
fallback:
venue: "" # decided BEFORE decisions arrive
required_rework: ""
```
## Planning a CoRL 2027 submission from scratch
Working backward from a late-May deadline (the 2026 pattern; 2027 dates 待核实):
1. **T minus 9–12 months** — lock the task suite and data-collection plan; hardware
time and teleop data are the long poles in robot-learning projects.
2. **T minus 6 months** — baselines running end to end; if a claim needs
sim-to-real evidence, the real-robot rig must exist by now, not in April.
3. **T minus 3 months** — full evaluation protocol frozen (seeds, episodes, task
splits — `corl-experiments`); start the paper with the Limitations section
drafted early, since it is mandatory and counts inside the 8 pages.
4. **T minus 1 month** — supplementary video storyboarded and shot
(`corl-supplementary`); anonymization sweep of paper, video, and any site.
5. **Deadline week** — abstract registration a few days before the paper deadline
(2026 spacing: May 26 vs May 29); final OpenReview form checks per
`corl-submission`.
## Risks specific to this venue's shape
- The rebuttal window is short and fixed; teams that start experiments after
reviews arrive routinely miss it. Prepare in the quiet period.
- The single annual deadline means a miss costs a full year — hold the routing
discussion (`corl-topic-selection`) before investing deadline-week effort.
- Hardware fails on deadline schedules: keep one robot-day of slack per claimed
real-robot table in the final month.
Reconfirm every date at https://www.corl.org/ (2026 cycle) or the 2027 year-site
before acting; this file records the 2026-07-08 state of knowledge.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!