Use when drafting or polishing a Conservation Biology manuscript so it reads accessibly for a broad conservation audience, follows the journal Style Guide, and fits the per-type word caps (e.g., Contributed Papers ~6,000–7,000; abstract <= 300 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conbio-writing-style --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Conbio Writing Style?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-conbio-writing-style)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: conbio-writing-style
description: Use when drafting or polishing a Conservation Biology manuscript so it reads accessibly for a broad conservation audience, follows the journal Style Guide, and fits the per-type word caps (e.g., Contributed Papers ~6,000–7,000; abstract <= 300 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
---
# Writing Style (conbio-writing-style)
A *Conservation Biology* paper must be readable by conservation scientists and practitioners beyond
the author's own system, formatted to the journal **Style Guide**, and disciplined to the per-type word
cap. This skill is about clarity, accessibility, and format — not about generating claims. (Verify the
current per-type caps; they drift between Style Guide versions — see `resources/official-source-map.md`.)
## When to trigger
- Drafting the introduction, framing the contribution, or final polish
- Over the word cap and needing to cut without losing the argument
- Writing the **≤ 300-word abstract**
- Aligning citations/headings/format to the Style Guide before submission
## Reach a broad conservation audience
1. **Front-load the conservation contribution.** By the end of the introduction the reader knows the
problem, the question, the approach, and **why it matters for conserving biodiversity.** Don't make
a generalist dig for the "so what."
2. **Minimize system jargon** or define it on first use; a practitioner should follow a population-model
paper, and a modeler should follow a field study. Spell out acronyms; use accepted species names.
3. **Argument-first prose.** Lead with claims; use evidence to support them. Avoid "the data show…"
without saying what they show and why it matters for conservation.
4. **Signpost and follow IMRAD.** Contributed Papers, Research Notes, and Practice & Policy follow
Abstract → Introduction → Methods → Results → Discussion; do not combine Results and Discussion, and
do not add a separate Conclusion (conclusions belong in the Discussion).
## Format to the Style Guide
- **Citations**: author-date per the journal Style Guide; keep one consistent style (manage with
Zotero/BibTeX). Literature Cited is included in the word count.
- **Title**: clear and concise; avoid hanging (colon/dash) titles, full-sentence titles, and
interrogative titles per the Style Guide.
- **Anonymize**: the journal is **double-blind** — no author names/affiliations in the manuscript, and
neutralize obvious self-references; strip identifying file metadata (see `conbio-submission`).
- **Abstract**: **≤ 300 words**, stating problem, approach, and finding (no abstract for Letters,
Comments, or Diversity).
## Fit the word cap (count runs from first word of Abstract through last word of Literature Cited)
- Note: the count **excludes tables, figure legends, and text inside tables.** Move full model output,
balance tables, and extended robustness to **Supporting Information**.
- Cut throat-clearing and literature dumps; engage the debate, not every paper (see
`conbio-literature-positioning`).
- Prefer one decisive figure to three redundant tables (and respect the ~one-exhibit-per-four-pages rule).
## Anti-patterns
- A system-insider intro that never states conservation relevance
- Burying the contribution in the middle of the paper
- An abstract over 300 words or one that hides the finding
- Hanging/interrogative/full-sentence titles; mixed citation styles
- Self-references that break the double-blind; padding a Research Note toward Contributed-Paper length
## Output format
```
【Conservation contribution stated by end of intro?】[Y/N]
【Reads past the system?】jargon defined / acronyms spelled? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤300)
【Word count】within the article-type cap (Abstract→Literature Cited)?
【Style Guide + anonymized + title style】[Y/N]
【Next】conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — reference managers and typesetting
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — word/abstract caps, Style Guide, IMRAD, title rules
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!