Use as the entry point for any Conservation Biology manuscript. Routes to the right conbio sub-skill based on where you are in the science lifecycle and which article type (Contributed Paper, Research Note, Review, Essay, Conservation Practice and Policy, Comment) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conbio-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Conbio Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-conbio-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: conbio-workflow
description: Use as the entry point for any Conservation Biology manuscript. Routes to the right conbio sub-skill based on where you are in the science lifecycle and which article type (Contributed Paper, Research Note, Review, Essay, Conservation Practice and Policy, Comment) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
---
# Conservation Biology Workflow Router (conbio-workflow)
The orchestrator for a *Conservation Biology* submission. Figure out the stage and the **article type**,
then send the user to the matching skill. *Conservation Biology* is the flagship journal of the
**Society for Conservation Biology** — the router's first job is to make sure the work has **direct,
transferable implications for the conservation of biological diversity**, not just a clean result.
## When to trigger
- Starting a new Conservation Biology paper and unsure where to begin
- Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
- Deciding which **article type** fits the work
- Returning with a decision letter (route to `conbio-revision-and-rebuttal`)
## First question: which article type?
| Situation | Article type | Route to |
|-----------|--------------|----------|
| Full empirical study, IMRAD, broad relevance | **Contributed Paper** (~6,000–7,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| Focused or preliminary result | **Research Note** (~3,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Synthesis of a well-developed literature | **Review** (~7,500–8,000 words) | `conbio-literature-positioning` + `conbio-writing-style` |
| Forward-looking argument on a conservation issue | **Essay** (~6,000 words) | `conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications` |
| Applied tools, policy, or management lessons | **Conservation Practice and Policy** (~5,000 words) | `conbio-study-design` + relevance |
| Response to a published paper | **Comment** (~2,000 words) | `conbio-literature-positioning` |
> Word caps drift between Style Guide versions — confirm the current per-type limits on the live
> Instructions for Authors page (see `resources/official-source-map.md`, marked 待核实).
## Routing map (stage → skill)
```text
Idea / conservation fit? → conbio-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → conbio-literature-positioning
Is the design sound? → conbio-study-design
Are the analyses appropriate? → conbio-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → conbio-figures-and-tables
Data + code archived? → conbio-reporting-and-data-policy
Does it read accessibly? → conbio-writing-style
Are the implications actionable? → conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications
How will it be judged? → conbio-review-process
Ready to submit? → conbio-submission
Got a decision / R&R? → conbio-revision-and-rebuttal
```
## Default order
`topic-selection → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis → figures-and-tables →
reporting-and-data-policy → writing-style → conservation-relevance-and-implications → review-process →
submission → revision-and-rebuttal`
Iterate: most papers loop design ↔ analysis ↔ relevance several times before writing-style.
## Anti-patterns
- Treating a sound-but-inconsequential study as publishable — the journal demands conservation relevance
- Forcing every study into one statistical template (match design to the ecological question)
- Padding a Research Note into a Contributed Paper, or vice versa
- Leaving the data/code archive until acceptance instead of building it as you go
## Output format
```
【Stage】idea / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / data-policy / writing / relevance / review / submit / revise
【Article type】Contributed Paper / Research Note / Review / Essay / Practice & Policy / Comment
【Route to】conbio-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — conservation data + software by method
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Conservation Biology URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!