Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Conservation Biology via Wiley's ScholarOne Manuscript Central — article-type selection, double-blind preparation, word/abstract caps, Style Guide formatting, data-availability statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conbio-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Conbio Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-conbio-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: conbio-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Conservation Biology via Wiley's ScholarOne Manuscript Central — article-type selection, double-blind preparation, word/abstract caps, Style Guide formatting, data-availability statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---
# Submission Preflight (conbio-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on **Wiley ScholarOne Manuscript Central**
(`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cobi`). *Conservation Biology* is **double-blind**, so the single most
common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript. Verify volatile specifics on the official
page before relying on them (per-type caps drift — see `resources/official-source-map.md`).
## When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata ScholarOne expects
- Confirming the chosen article type's caps are met and the manuscript is properly anonymized
## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- **Owner / publisher:** Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) / Wiley.
- **Portal:** **Wiley ScholarOne Manuscript Central** (`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cobi`).
- **Review model:** **double-blind** — anonymize the manuscript and author identities; provide a
separate title page.
- **Article types & word limits (verify; versions drift):** Contributed Papers ~6,000–7,000 · Research
Notes ~3,000 · Reviews ~7,500–8,000 · Essays ~6,000 · Conservation Practice and Policy 5,000 ·
Comments 2,000 · Diversity 2,000 · Letters 1,000.
- **Abstract:** **≤ 300 words** (none for Letters, Comments, or Diversity).
- **Word count:** runs from the **first word of the Abstract through the last word of Literature
Cited**; **excludes** tables, figure legends, and text in tables.
- **Exhibits:** about **one table/figure per four pages** of text.
- **Style:** *Conservation Biology* **Style Guide** (author-date); IMRAD for Contributed Papers,
Research Notes, and Practice & Policy.
- **Data:** **data-availability statement** + deposit of data/code in a public repository (e.g., Dryad)
with a persistent identifier (待核实 on exact mandatory wording).
## Preflight checklist
### Article type & length
- [ ] Article type chosen and its word cap met (count Abstract → Literature Cited)
- [ ] Abstract ≤ 300 words, states problem + approach + finding (omit where the type forbids it)
- [ ] Exhibit count within ~one per four pages; extras moved to Supporting Information
### Anonymity (double-blind)
- [ ] No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
- [ ] Self-references neutralized ("as we showed in…" removed)
- [ ] Identifying **file metadata stripped** (document properties, comments)
- [ ] Separate (non-anonymous) title page prepared as a distinct file
### Format & content
- [ ] Style Guide formatting; consistent author-date citations; title-style rules followed
- [ ] IMRAD order where required; no combined Results/Discussion; no separate Conclusion
- [ ] Figures/tables/maps self-contained and accessible; sensitive localities masked
(see `conbio-figures-and-tables`)
- [ ] **Conservation relevance** stated explicitly (see `conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications`)
### Compliance & data
- [ ] Ethics / permits / animal-care / human-subjects compliance stated
- [ ] **Data-availability statement** drafted; data/code package staged for a public repository
(see `conbio-reporting-and-data-policy`)
- [ ] Sensitive-species data masked; restricted-data access path provided
## Anti-patterns
- Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks double-blind)
- Abstract over 300 words; word count outside the chosen type's cap
- Sending a long paper to the Research Note or Comment type
- Choosing Registered Reports after results exist
- Submitting with no data-availability statement or with sensitive locations exposed
## Output format
```
【Article type】Contributed Paper / Note / Review / Essay / Practice & Policy / Comment (cap met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤300, or N/A)
【Word count】within cap (Abstract→Literature Cited)? [Y/N]
【Style Guide + IMRAD + title rules】[Y/N]
【Data-availability statement + package staged】[Y/N]
【Next】await decision → conbio-revision-and-rebuttal on revision
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — reference managers, anonymization, repro tooling
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Conservation Biology URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!