Back to skills
SKILL.md
Clinical Research Guide
ASecurityDesign clinical studies and report using CONSORT, STROBE guidelines
- 3,639 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 6 views
- Added June 6, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill clinical-research-guide --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Clinical Research Guide?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-clinical-research-guide)---
name: clinical-research-guide
description: "Design clinical studies and report using CONSORT, STROBE guidelines"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "🏥"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "biomedical"
keywords: ["clinical research", "CONSORT", "STROBE", "clinical trial", "study design", "reporting guidelines"]
source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---
# Clinical Research Guide
A skill for designing clinical studies and reporting results according to established guidelines. Covers randomized controlled trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), diagnostic studies (STARD), and systematic reviews (PRISMA).
## Study Design Selection
### Hierarchy of Evidence
```
Systematic Reviews / Meta-analyses
|
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
|
Cohort Studies (prospective)
|
Case-Control Studies
|
Cross-Sectional Studies
|
Case Reports / Case Series
|
Expert Opinion
Choose the design that best answers your research question
given ethical, practical, and resource constraints.
```
### Design Decision Framework
```python
def select_study_design(research_question: str,
can_randomize: bool,
outcome_prevalence: str,
time_constraint: str) -> dict:
"""
Guide selection of clinical study design.
Args:
research_question: The clinical question
can_randomize: Whether randomization is ethical and feasible
outcome_prevalence: 'common' or 'rare'
time_constraint: 'short', 'medium', or 'long'
"""
if can_randomize:
design = {
"recommended": "Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)",
"reporting": "CONSORT 2010",
"strengths": "Strongest causal inference",
"considerations": [
"Need equipoise (genuine uncertainty about which is better)",
"Blinding may or may not be feasible",
"Intent-to-treat analysis is the primary approach",
"Pre-register at ClinicalTrials.gov or ISRCTN"
]
}
elif outcome_prevalence == "rare":
design = {
"recommended": "Case-Control Study",
"reporting": "STROBE",
"strengths": "Efficient for rare outcomes",
"considerations": [
"Select controls carefully (matching, population-based)",
"Recall bias is a major threat",
"Can only calculate odds ratios, not incidence"
]
}
elif time_constraint == "short":
design = {
"recommended": "Cross-Sectional Study",
"reporting": "STROBE (cross-sectional extension)",
"strengths": "Quick, inexpensive, good for prevalence",
"considerations": [
"Cannot establish temporal sequence",
"Prevalence bias (overrepresents chronic conditions)",
"Useful for hypothesis generation"
]
}
else:
design = {
"recommended": "Prospective Cohort Study",
"reporting": "STROBE",
"strengths": "Can establish temporal sequence, multiple outcomes",
"considerations": [
"Loss to follow-up is the main threat",
"Confounding must be addressed analytically",
"Expensive and time-consuming"
]
}
return design
```
## CONSORT for Randomized Trials
### Essential CONSORT Checklist Items
```
Title and Abstract:
- Identify as randomized trial in the title
- Structured abstract with trial design, methods, results, conclusions
Methods:
- Trial design (parallel, crossover, factorial, etc.)
- Participants: Eligibility criteria, settings, locations
- Interventions: Precise details of interventions for each group
- Outcomes: Primary and secondary, how and when assessed
- Sample size: Calculation with assumptions stated
- Randomization: Sequence generation, allocation concealment
- Blinding: Who was blinded, how blinding was maintained
Results:
- CONSORT flow diagram (enrollment, allocation, follow-up, analysis)
- Baseline demographic table (Table 1)
- Primary outcome with effect size and confidence interval
- Harms and adverse events
Discussion:
- Limitations including sources of potential bias
- Generalizability
- Interpretation consistent with results
```
### CONSORT Flow Diagram
```
Assessed for eligibility (n=...)
|
Excluded (n=...)
- Not meeting criteria (n=...)
- Declined to participate (n=...)
- Other reasons (n=...)
|
Randomized (n=...)
/ \
Allocated to Allocated to
intervention (n=...) control (n=...)
| |
Lost to follow-up Lost to follow-up
(n=..., reasons) (n=..., reasons)
| |
Analyzed (n=...) Analyzed (n=...)
Excluded from analysis Excluded from analysis
(n=..., reasons) (n=..., reasons)
```
## STROBE for Observational Studies
### Key STROBE Requirements
```
Study design specific items:
Cohort:
- Report follow-up time (person-years, median)
- Report loss to follow-up with reasons
- Use hazard ratios or incidence rate ratios
Case-Control:
- Describe case definition and case ascertainment
- Describe control selection (source, matching criteria)
- Report odds ratios with confidence intervals
Cross-Sectional:
- Report response rate and non-response analysis
- Describe how the sample represents the target population
- Report prevalence with confidence intervals
```
## Sample Size and Power
### Power Calculation
```python
def power_analysis_rct(effect_size: float, alpha: float = 0.05,
power: float = 0.80, ratio: float = 1.0) -> dict:
"""
Calculate required sample size for a two-arm RCT.
Args:
effect_size: Expected Cohen's d
alpha: Significance level (two-sided)
power: Desired statistical power
ratio: Allocation ratio (control:treatment)
"""
from scipy import stats
import math
z_alpha = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
z_beta = stats.norm.ppf(power)
n_per_arm = math.ceil(
((z_alpha + z_beta) ** 2 * (1 + 1 / ratio)) / effect_size ** 2
)
return {
"n_per_arm": n_per_arm,
"total_n": n_per_arm + math.ceil(n_per_arm * ratio),
"parameters": {
"effect_size": effect_size,
"alpha": alpha,
"power": power,
"allocation_ratio": f"1:{ratio}"
},
"note": "Add 10-20% for anticipated dropout"
}
```
## Other Reporting Guidelines
| Guideline | Study Type | Checklist Items |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|
| CONSORT | Randomized trials | 25 items + flow diagram |
| STROBE | Observational studies | 22 items |
| STARD | Diagnostic accuracy studies | 30 items |
| PRISMA | Systematic reviews | 27 items + flow diagram |
| TRIPOD | Prediction models | 22 items |
| SPIRIT | Trial protocols | 33 items |
| CARE | Case reports | 13 items |
All checklists are available at the EQUATOR Network (equator-network.org). Most journals require submission of the relevant checklist with your manuscript. Completing the checklist during manuscript writing, not after, ensures comprehensive reporting.
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.