Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Ceq Abstract English

ASecurity

Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/4/2026
ai-agents

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/4/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ceq-abstract-english --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ceq Abstract English?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ceq Abstract English
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-ceq-abstract-english/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ceq-abstract-english)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: ceq-abstract-english
description: Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.
---

# 英文摘要与贡献陈述(ceq-abstract-english)

## 触发时机

- 英文摘要质量差 / 中式英语 / 超长
- 贡献写成"This paper enriches the literature on…"
- 定稿前,主结果与识别已确定

## 为什么重要

CEQ 很多读者**只读英文摘要 + 图**(见 `ceq-figures`)。英文摘要 = 你的门面。它必须让 field 经济学家在 100 词内看懂:**问什么、怎么识别、发现什么、相对谁是新的**。CEQ 规范:英文摘要不超过约 100 个单词,三个中英文关键词,三个 JEL 号(详见 `resources/journal-profile.md`)。

## 五句法(控制在 ~100 词)

1. **问题**:研究的因果问题(一句,去本土包装)。
2. **设计**:识别来源("Using the staggered rollout of …, we …")。
3. **发现**:量化主结果 + 单位("… raises Y by X%")。
4. **机制**:一句话渠道。
5. **贡献/含义**:相对最近文献的差异,或一句政策/理论含义。

## 好坏对照

| 黑名单(中式/空话) | 白名单(field 可读) |
|---------------------|----------------------|
| "This paper enriches the literature." | "We provide the first credibly identified estimate of …" |
| "We use a series of robust methods." | "Using a regression discontinuity at the eligibility cutoff …" |
| "The results have important policy implications." | "A 10% increase in X reduces Y by 4%, implying …" |
| "Our study fills a gap in domestic research." | "Unlike Author (Year), who rely on OLS, we exploit …" |

## 英文写作规范

- 主动语态、现在时陈述发现;避免冗长从句。
- 量化结果带单位与符号方向,别只说"significant"。
- 术语用 field 标准词(identification, parallel trends, instrument),不要直译中文。
- 不堆方法名词;识别策略一句带过即可。
- 中英文摘要表意一致,但英文不必逐句直译中文。

## 自检清单

- [ ] 英文摘要 ≤ ~100 词(按官网规范复核)
- [ ] 五要素齐:问题/设计/发现/机制/贡献
- [ ] 主结果量化、带单位与方向
- [ ] 贡献对标具体文献,无 "enrich/fill the gap" 套话
- [ ] field 同行不读正文即可懂贡献
- [ ] 三个关键词、三个 JEL 号已备(见 `ceq-submission`)

## 反模式

- 英文摘要是中文摘要的机器直译
- 通篇 "significant" 不给数字
- 罗列方法却不说识别从哪来
- 用大词收尾("profound implications")替代具体含义

## 输出格式

```
【英文摘要词数】X / ≤100
【五要素】问题□ 设计□ 发现(量化)□ 机制□ 贡献□
【套话命中】X 处:[...]
【贡献对标】具体文献 □ / 仍套话(需改)
【关键词/JEL】3 关键词 □ 3 JEL □
【下一步】ceq-submission
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →