Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.
Scanned 6/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ceq-abstract-english --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ceq Abstract English?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ceq-abstract-english)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ceq-abstract-english
description: Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.
---
# 英文摘要与贡献陈述(ceq-abstract-english)
## 触发时机
- 英文摘要质量差 / 中式英语 / 超长
- 贡献写成"This paper enriches the literature on…"
- 定稿前,主结果与识别已确定
## 为什么重要
CEQ 很多读者**只读英文摘要 + 图**(见 `ceq-figures`)。英文摘要 = 你的门面。它必须让 field 经济学家在 100 词内看懂:**问什么、怎么识别、发现什么、相对谁是新的**。CEQ 规范:英文摘要不超过约 100 个单词,三个中英文关键词,三个 JEL 号(详见 `resources/journal-profile.md`)。
## 五句法(控制在 ~100 词)
1. **问题**:研究的因果问题(一句,去本土包装)。
2. **设计**:识别来源("Using the staggered rollout of …, we …")。
3. **发现**:量化主结果 + 单位("… raises Y by X%")。
4. **机制**:一句话渠道。
5. **贡献/含义**:相对最近文献的差异,或一句政策/理论含义。
## 好坏对照
| 黑名单(中式/空话) | 白名单(field 可读) |
|---------------------|----------------------|
| "This paper enriches the literature." | "We provide the first credibly identified estimate of …" |
| "We use a series of robust methods." | "Using a regression discontinuity at the eligibility cutoff …" |
| "The results have important policy implications." | "A 10% increase in X reduces Y by 4%, implying …" |
| "Our study fills a gap in domestic research." | "Unlike Author (Year), who rely on OLS, we exploit …" |
## 英文写作规范
- 主动语态、现在时陈述发现;避免冗长从句。
- 量化结果带单位与符号方向,别只说"significant"。
- 术语用 field 标准词(identification, parallel trends, instrument),不要直译中文。
- 不堆方法名词;识别策略一句带过即可。
- 中英文摘要表意一致,但英文不必逐句直译中文。
## 自检清单
- [ ] 英文摘要 ≤ ~100 词(按官网规范复核)
- [ ] 五要素齐:问题/设计/发现/机制/贡献
- [ ] 主结果量化、带单位与方向
- [ ] 贡献对标具体文献,无 "enrich/fill the gap" 套话
- [ ] field 同行不读正文即可懂贡献
- [ ] 三个关键词、三个 JEL 号已备(见 `ceq-submission`)
## 反模式
- 英文摘要是中文摘要的机器直译
- 通篇 "significant" 不给数字
- 罗列方法却不说识别从哪来
- 用大词收尾("profound implications")替代具体含义
## 输出格式
```
【英文摘要词数】X / ≤100
【五要素】问题□ 设计□ 发现(量化)□ 机制□ 贡献□
【套话命中】X 处:[...]
【贡献对标】具体文献 □ / 仍套话(需改)
【关键词/JEL】3 关键词 □ 3 JEL □
【下一步】ceq-submission
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!