Use when assembling STAR Methods and the Key Resources Table for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript, and when ensuring rigor / reproducibility (cell-line authentication, mycoplasma, antibody validation, ARRIVE animal reporting, data/code deposition). It governs reporting; it does not design experiments.
Scanned 6/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cc-reporting-standards --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cc Reporting Standards?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-cc-reporting-standards)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cc-reporting-standards
description: Use when assembling STAR Methods and the Key Resources Table for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript, and when ensuring rigor / reproducibility (cell-line authentication, mycoplasma, antibody validation, ARRIVE animal reporting, data/code deposition). It governs reporting; it does not design experiments.
---
# Rigor, Reproducibility & STAR Methods (cc-reporting-standards)
## When to trigger
- Drafting or auditing the Methods section for a Cell Press submission
- Reviewers may flag unauthenticated cell lines, undefined reagents, or missing deposition
- Need to build the Key Resources Table (KRT) and assign RRIDs
- Animal or sequencing work needs structured rigor reporting
## STAR Methods structure
Cell Press uses **STAR Methods** (Structured, Transparent, Accessible Reporting). Organize methods under standardized headings:
1. **Key Resources Table (KRT)** — at the top; tabulates every critical reagent/resource with source, identifier, and RRID.
2. **Resource availability** — Lead contact; Materials availability (plasmids, cell lines, mouse strains); Data and code availability.
3. **Experimental model and study participant details** — cell lines, animals, human subjects, organoids/PDX provenance.
4. **Method details** — full protocols, reproducible by an expert.
5. **Quantification and statistical analysis** — what test, what `n`, what software (links to `cc-statistics`).
## Key Resources Table — what must carry an RRID / identifier
| Category | Required detail |
|----------|-----------------|
| Antibodies | Host, clone, vendor, catalog #, RRID, dilution/application |
| Cell lines | Name, sex/origin, source, authentication status, RRID (Cellosaurus) |
| Chemicals / inhibitors | Vendor, catalog #, identifier |
| Critical kits | Vendor, catalog # |
| Deposited data | Repository + accession (GEO/SRA/PRIDE/PDB) |
| Oligos / sgRNAs / primers | Full sequences |
| Recombinant DNA / plasmids | Source, Addgene # / RRID |
| Organisms / strains | Strain, source, RRID (e.g., MGI/JAX) |
| Software / algorithms | Name, version, URL, RRID |
## Cell-line rigor (frequent reviewer target)
- **Authenticate** human cell lines (STR profiling); reference Cellosaurus; state the source.
- **Mycoplasma testing** — state that lines were tested negative; give frequency.
- Flag any misidentified/commonly contaminated lines (ICLAC register) and justify use.
- Report passage range and culture conditions enough to reproduce.
## Antibody validation
- Give clone, catalog, RRID, and **application-specific** validation (KO/KD control, single band of expected MW, IHC titration with positive/negative tissue).
- For new/critical antibodies, show validation in the supplement.
## Animal reporting (ARRIVE 2.0 essentials)
- Species, strain, sex, age, source; housing and husbandry.
- **Sample size** rationale; **randomization**; **blinding** of outcome assessment.
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria; humane endpoints; number used and analyzed.
- IACUC protocol number and approving institution (statement routed via `cc-ethics-registration`).
## Data and code availability
- Deposit and cite accessions in the KRT and availability statement:
- Sequencing / arrays → **GEO/SRA**; controlled human genomics → **dbGaP/EGA**
- Proteomics → **PRIDE**; metabolomics → MetaboLights/Workbench
- Structures → **PDB** (+ **EMDB** for cryo-EM maps)
- Custom code → versioned public repo with a citable DOI (e.g., Zenodo).
- "Available on request" is unacceptable for these data types.
## Checklist
- [ ] STAR Methods headings used; KRT at top
- [ ] Every antibody, cell line, organism, plasmid, software has source + RRID
- [ ] Human cell lines STR-authenticated; mycoplasma-negative stated
- [ ] Antibody validation described (and shown for critical ones)
- [ ] Animal section reports sample size, randomization, blinding, exclusions
- [ ] All large datasets deposited; accessions in KRT + availability statement
- [ ] Custom code deposited with DOI
- [ ] Lead contact and materials-availability statements present
## Anti-patterns
- Cell lines with no authentication or mycoplasma statement
- Antibodies listed as "anti-X (Abcam)" with no catalog/RRID/validation
- Animal methods with no randomization/blinding/sample-size basis
- Sequencing data "available upon request" with no accession
- Methods too thin to reproduce the experiment
## Output format
```
【STAR Methods】headings complete? KRT present?
【KRT gaps】reagents missing source/RRID: [...]
【Cell-line rigor】authenticated? mycoplasma? contaminated-line flags?
【Antibody validation】adequate / show in supplement: [...]
【Animal rigor】ARRIVE elements present? [...]
【Deposition】GEO/SRA/PRIDE/PDB accessions + code DOI status
【Next step】cc-statistics or cc-ethics-registration
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!