Skip to content
Back to skills

Behavioral Economics Guide

ASecurity

Behavioral economics research methods and key frameworks

  • 3,639 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added June 6, 2026
researchpythongogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 6, 2026

npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill behavioral-economics-guide --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Behavioral Economics Guide?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Behavioral Economics Guide
[![Security: A β€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-behavioral-economics-guide/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-behavioral-economics-guide)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: behavioral-economics-guide
description: "Behavioral economics research methods and key frameworks"
metadata:
  openclaw:
    emoji: "🧠"
    category: "domains"
    subcategory: "economics"
    keywords: ["behavioral economics", "microeconomics", "development economics"]
    source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---

# Behavioral Economics Guide

Conduct behavioral economics research using experimental methods, prospect theory, nudge frameworks, and key empirical tools for studying decision-making under bounded rationality.

## Core Theoretical Frameworks

### Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979)

People evaluate outcomes relative to a reference point, with losses looming larger than equivalent gains:

```
Key features:
1. Reference dependence: Utility is defined over gains and losses, not absolute wealth
2. Loss aversion: lambda β‰ˆ 2.25 (losses hurt ~2.25x more than equivalent gains)
3. Diminishing sensitivity: Marginal impact decreases as you move away from reference
4. Probability weighting: Overweight small probabilities, underweight large ones

Value function:
v(x) = x^alpha            if x >= 0  (alpha β‰ˆ 0.88)
v(x) = -lambda * (-x)^beta if x < 0  (beta β‰ˆ 0.88, lambda β‰ˆ 2.25)

Probability weighting function (Prelec, 1998):
w(p) = exp(-(-ln(p))^alpha)   (alpha β‰ˆ 0.65 for gains, 0.69 for losses)
```

### Dual Process Theory (Kahneman, 2011)

| System 1 (Fast) | System 2 (Slow) |
|-----------------|-----------------|
| Automatic, effortless | Deliberate, effortful |
| Intuitive, heuristic-based | Analytical, rule-based |
| Parallel processing | Serial processing |
| Emotional | Logical |
| Prone to biases | Can override biases |
| Default mode | Activated when needed |

### Nudge Theory (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008)

Nudges alter choice architecture to influence decisions without restricting options:

| Nudge Type | Example | Mechanism |
|-----------|---------|-----------|
| Default setting | Opt-out organ donation | Status quo bias |
| Salience | Calorie labels at point of sale | Attention focus |
| Social norms | "9 out of 10 neighbors recycle" | Conformity |
| Commitment device | Pre-commitment to savings plans | Present bias correction |
| Simplification | Pre-filled tax forms | Reduce cognitive load |
| Feedback | Real-time energy usage display | Information salience |
| Framing | "90% survival" vs "10% mortality" | Reference frame |

## Key Behavioral Biases and Experimental Tests

| Bias | Definition | Classic Experiment |
|------|-----------|-------------------|
| **Anchoring** | Over-reliance on first piece of information | Wheel of fortune + estimation task |
| **Endowment effect** | Overvaluing what you own | Mug trading experiment (Kahneman et al., 1990) |
| **Status quo bias** | Preference for current state | Default choice experiments |
| **Present bias** | Overweighting immediate outcomes | Discount rate elicitation |
| **Sunk cost fallacy** | Continuing due to past investment | Theater ticket scenario |
| **Overconfidence** | Overestimating own knowledge/ability | Calibration tasks |
| **Availability heuristic** | Judging probability by ease of recall | Frequency estimation tasks |
| **Representativeness** | Judging probability by similarity | Linda problem |
| **Framing effect** | Choices depend on how options are presented | Asian disease problem |

## Experimental Methods

### Lab Experiments

```python
# Example: Dictator Game implementation with oTree
# oTree is the standard platform for behavioral economics experiments

# models.py
class Player(BasePlayer):
    dictator_give = models.CurrencyField(
        min=0, max=100,
        label="How much do you want to give to the other participant?"
    )

# pages.py
class Decision(Page):
    form_model = 'player'
    form_fields = ['dictator_give']

    def vars_for_template(self):
        return {'endowment': 100}

class Results(Page):
    def vars_for_template(self):
        return {
            'kept': 100 - self.player.dictator_give,
            'given': self.player.dictator_give
        }
```

### Field Experiments and RCTs

```
Design checklist for a behavioral field experiment:

1. RESEARCH QUESTION
   "Does changing the default retirement contribution rate from 3% to 6%
   increase average savings?"

2. TREATMENT ARMS
   - Control: Default contribution = 3% (status quo)
   - Treatment 1: Default contribution = 6% (higher default)
   - Treatment 2: Default contribution = 6% + active choice prompt

3. RANDOMIZATION
   - Unit: Individual employees
   - Method: Stratified randomization by age, salary, tenure
   - Balance checks: t-tests on observables across treatment arms

4. SAMPLE SIZE
   - Power calculation: N = 1,200 per arm (power=0.80, MDE=2pp,
     alpha=0.05, ICC adjusted for clustering by department)

5. OUTCOME MEASURES
   - Primary: Contribution rate at 6 months
   - Secondary: Total savings at 12 months, opt-out rate
   - Administrative data (no survey needed)

6. PRE-REGISTRATION
   - Register on AEA RCT Registry before treatment assignment
```

### Survey Experiments

```python
# Example: Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) elicitation using BDM mechanism
# Becker-DeGroot-Marschak procedure

import numpy as np

def bdm_auction(stated_wtp, item_cost_range=(0, 20)):
    """
    Becker-DeGroot-Marschak incentive-compatible mechanism.
    Random price drawn; participant buys if WTP >= price.
    """
    random_price = np.random.uniform(*item_cost_range)
    buys = stated_wtp >= random_price
    payment = random_price if buys else 0
    return {
        "stated_wtp": stated_wtp,
        "random_price": round(random_price, 2),
        "purchased": buys,
        "payment": round(payment, 2)
    }

# This is incentive-compatible: truthfully reporting WTP is optimal
# because the price is determined independently of the stated WTP
```

## Time Preferences and Discounting

```python
# Estimating discount factors from multiple price list (MPL) choices

def estimate_discount_factor(choices, amounts, delays):
    """
    Estimate quasi-hyperbolic discounting parameters (beta, delta)
    from a series of smaller-sooner vs. larger-later choices.

    beta: present bias (< 1 means present-biased)
    delta: long-run discount factor (per period)
    """
    from scipy.optimize import minimize

    def neg_log_likelihood(params):
        beta, delta = params
        ll = 0
        for choice, (ss, ll_amt), (t_ss, t_ll) in zip(choices, amounts, delays):
            # Discounted utility of each option
            if t_ss == 0:
                u_ss = ss  # No discounting for immediate
                u_ll = beta * (delta ** t_ll) * ll_amt
            else:
                u_ss = beta * (delta ** t_ss) * ss
                u_ll = beta * (delta ** t_ll) * ll_amt

            p_ll = 1 / (1 + np.exp(-(u_ll - u_ss)))  # Logit
            ll += choice * np.log(p_ll + 1e-10) + (1-choice) * np.log(1-p_ll + 1e-10)
        return -ll

    result = minimize(neg_log_likelihood, [0.9, 0.95],
                      bounds=[(0.01, 1.5), (0.8, 1.0)])
    return {"beta": result.x[0], "delta": result.x[1]}
```

## Data Analysis in Behavioral Economics

### Common Estimation Methods

| Method | Use Case | Software |
|--------|----------|----------|
| OLS / Logit | Treatment effects, survey experiments | Stata, R, Python |
| IV / 2SLS | Endogeneity in field settings | Stata (`ivregress`), R (`ivreg`) |
| Difference-in-differences | Policy evaluation | Stata, R (`did` package) |
| Structural estimation | Utility function parameters | Stata, MATLAB, Python |
| Random utility models | Discrete choice experiments | R (`mlogit`), Python (`pylogit`) |
| Clustering corrections | Within-group correlation | Stata `vce(cluster)`, R `sandwich` |

## Key Resources

| Resource | Type | Description |
|----------|------|-------------|
| oTree | Software | Open-source platform for behavioral experiments |
| Gorilla | Platform | Online experiment builder (psychology/economics) |
| LIONESS Lab | Platform | Real-time interactive online experiments |
| AEA RCT Registry | Registry | Pre-registration for economics experiments |
| J-PAL | Organization | Poverty Action Lab, methodological resources |
| NBER Behavioral Finance | Working papers | Latest research in behavioral finance |

## Top Journals and Venues

| Journal | Focus |
|---------|-------|
| American Economic Review | Top 5, publishes major behavioral papers |
| Quarterly Journal of Economics | Top 5, strong behavioral presence |
| Journal of Political Economy | Top 5 |
| Econometrica | Top 5, theory + experiments |
| Journal of the European Economic Association | Top field journal |
| Management Science | Behavioral operations, decision-making |
| Experimental Economics | Dedicated experiments journal |
| Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics | Broader behavioral |
| Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization | Interdisciplinary behavioral |

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.