Use to plan and execute the illustration, copyright-permission, and reproduction-quality workflow for an Art Bulletin article — the distinctive, slow, author-funded task of art-historical publishing. The author secures and pays for rights and supplies high-resolution images. Manages the image workflow; it does not grant rights or waive fees.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill artbull-images-and-permissions --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Artbull Images And Permissions?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-artbull-images-and-permissions)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: artbull-images-and-permissions
description: Use to plan and execute the illustration, copyright-permission, and reproduction-quality workflow for an Art Bulletin article — the distinctive, slow, author-funded task of art-historical publishing. The author secures and pays for rights and supplies high-resolution images. Manages the image workflow; it does not grant rights or waive fees.
---
# Images & Permissions (artbull-images-and-permissions)
This is the skill that most distinguishes art-history publishing. The Art Bulletin requires
**illustrations**, and it is the **author's responsibility to obtain and pay for reproduction
permissions and photography**. Clearance is **slow and expensive**, so start it the moment the key
images are known — in parallel with the writing, not after. At submission, images go in **one Word
file (max 20 images, ≤ 10 MB)**; **high-resolution files are supplied promptly on acceptance**.
## When to trigger
- As soon as you know which works the argument depends on (start clearance now)
- Building the illustration list, captions, and credit lines
- Deciding fair use vs. paid permission for each figure
- Preparing high-resolution files after acceptance
- A budget or deadline threatens whether a key image can be reproduced
## The permissions workflow
1. **List the figures the argument requires.** Distinguish *essential* (the argument fails without
them) from *supporting*; keep within the ~20-illustration limit and let the argument drive the list.
2. **Identify the rights holder for the actual reproduction.** A public-domain *work* can still have a
copyrighted *photograph*: clear rights with the **copyright holder** (artist/estate, museum, or
rights agency such as Art Resource, Bridgeman, Scala, ARS) — not with the book the scan came from.
3. **Decide fair use vs. permission per figure.** It is the author's responsibility to determine fair
use; the **CAA Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts** is the field reference.
When in doubt, seek permission.
4. **Secure the right license scope.** Get **world rights, print + electronic, all editions** where
possible; mismatched scope (e.g., print-only) causes problems at production and for the online and
open-access versions.
5. **Source publication-quality files.** Prefer open-access museum downloads and IIIF where the
rights allow; otherwise commission or license a press-quality file (commonly **300 dpi at print
size**, TIFF for photographs, vector for plans/diagrams — confirm specs at acceptance).
6. **Write captions and credit lines correctly.** Artist, *italicized title*, date, medium,
dimensions (inches then centimeters), collection and location, and the **required credit/copyright
line** in parentheses — using the exact wording the rights holder mandates.
7. **Keep a permissions log.** Per figure: rights holder, contact, fee, license scope, date granted,
credit-line wording, and file source. This is your evidence at production.
## Budget & timeline reality
- Fees range from free (open access / public domain) to hundreds of dollars per image; living artists'
estates can be restrictive and slow. **Budget money and months.**
- If a key image cannot be cleared or afforded, the argument may need to lean on a different,
clearable work — decide this **early**, not at proof stage.
## Anti-patterns
- Leaving permissions until acceptance — the classic, paper-delaying mistake
- Clearing rights from the source book rather than the actual copyright holder
- Assuming a public-domain object means the photograph is rights-free
- Licensing the wrong scope (print-only) and breaking the online / open-access edition
- Low-resolution or manipulated files that misrepresent the object
- Captions missing the mandated credit line wording
## Output format
```
【Figure list】essential vs supporting (count ≤ 20)
【Per figure】rights holder · fair use or permission · license scope · fee · file source
【Captions/credit lines】full + mandated wording? [Y/N]
【High-res plan】formats/resolution staged for acceptance? [Y/N]
【Permissions log】started and complete? [Y/N]
【Risk】any decisive image unclearable/unaffordable? fallback?
【Next】artbull-structure-and-exposition
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — image sources, rights agencies, fair-use code, resolution/format guidance
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — author-responsibility-for-permissions and illustration-file policy
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!