Use when building the exhibits of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — data-inventory and evidence tables for qualitative work, cell-means and process-test tables for experiments, and figures that carry theoretical weight — in Elsevier-compatible format. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (aos-data-analysis).
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-tables-figures --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aos Tables Figures?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-aos-tables-figures)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aos-tables-figures
description: Use when building the exhibits of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — data-inventory and evidence tables for qualitative work, cell-means and process-test tables for experiments, and figures that carry theoretical weight — in Elsevier-compatible format. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (aos-data-analysis).
---
# Tables & Figures (aos-tables-figures)
## When to trigger
- A field paper has long quotations but no exhibit showing the evidentiary base
- Experimental results lack a clean cell-means or contrast table
- A figure decorates rather than argues (or a needed process figure is missing)
- Formatting must be reconciled with Elsevier submission requirements
## Exhibits by tradition — what AOS reviewers look for
**Qualitative field / historical papers**
- **Data-inventory table**: interviews (number, roles, duration, period), observations (events, hours), documents (types, spans) — the single exhibit that preempts "how much data is behind this?"
- **Evidence table(s)**: conceptual claim or second-order theme in one column, representative field excerpts in the other, so the interpretive chain is inspectable without bloating the text.
- **Coding-structure exhibit** where the paper's method warrants it: first-order codes → second-order categories → aggregate concepts, showing movement from informant language to theory.
- **Timeline or process figure** for change studies: phases, key events, and where the accounting practice intervened.
- Anonymize consistently — pseudonyms and role labels in exhibits must match the text and betray no site identity.
**Experimental / survey papers**
- Cell-means table: means, SDs, n per condition; the predicted pattern visible at a glance.
- Contrast/ANOVA table plus process results (mediation with bootstrap CIs) as exhibits, not prose asides.
- An interaction figure with error bars when a moderation is the theory's signature; axis units interpretable, no truncated scales that exaggerate effects.
- Survey papers: construct table (items, sources, reliabilities) and a correlation matrix.
**Archival-with-theory papers**
- Descriptives, the main estimation table with clustering and fixed-effects structure stated in the notes, and magnitudes interpreted in institutional terms.
## Self-containment and format
- Every exhibit readable alone: title stating what it shows, sample/period, definitions, and the meaning of any markers in the notes.
- Number tables and figures consecutively; place callouts in the text; Elsevier prefers editable source files for tables and high-resolution figure files at final stages — confirm current artwork specs in the AOS Guide for Authors before submission.
- Keep exhibits inside the double-anonymized envelope: no author names in captions, file names, or embedded metadata.
- Ration exhibits: each one must carry evidence or structure the argument; move genuinely supplementary material to an appendix or online supplement.
## The one-sentence test
For every exhibit, write the sentence it proves ("Table 2 shows the interpretation rests on 74 interviews across four roles over 26 months"; "Figure 3 shows the effect reverses under high accountability"). If no sentence exists, cut the exhibit; if the sentence is central and no exhibit backs it, build one.
## Checklist
- [ ] (Qualitative) data-inventory table present; evidence/coding exhibits trace claims to material
- [ ] (Experimental) cell means, contrasts, process tests, and the key interaction figure present
- [ ] Every exhibit passes the one-sentence test and is self-contained
- [ ] Pseudonyms/labels consistent across text and exhibits; anonymity preserved
- [ ] Numbering, callouts, and artwork specs match the current Guide for Authors
- [ ] No exhibit metadata or file name identifies the authors or the site
## Anti-patterns
- **Quote dumps in tables** — excerpts without the conceptual column that gives them a job.
- **Decorative frameworks**: boxes-and-arrows figures that restate the table of contents.
- **Cell-means tables missing n or SDs**, or interaction plots without uncertainty.
- **Exhibit inflation**: ten tables where three would carry the argument.
- **Anonymity leaks** through logos, letterheads, or document scans reproduced in figures.
## Output format
```
【Exhibit list】each with its one-sentence job ...
【Data inventory (qual)】interviews / observations / documents tabulated? ...
【Process exhibits (exp)】cell means, contrasts, mediation, interaction figure ...
【Self-containment】titles, notes, definitions complete? ...
【Anonymity & format】pseudonyms consistent; Elsevier artwork specs checked ...
【Next step】aos-writing-style
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!