Use when deciding whether a project fits Agricultural Systems (AgSy) and which article type to target. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the test is a genuine systems question — interactions among components, across hierarchical levels (field → farm → landscape → region → food system), trade-offs, and emergent behavior — analyzed with integrated modelling, NOT a single-factor field trial. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
Scanned 6/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill agsy-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agsy Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-agsy-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agsy-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether a project fits Agricultural Systems (AgSy) and which article type to target. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the test is a genuine systems question — interactions among components, across hierarchical levels (field → farm → landscape → region → food system), trade-offs, and emergent behavior — analyzed with integrated modelling, NOT a single-factor field trial. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
---
# Topic Selection & Fit (agsy-topic-selection)
Agricultural Systems publishes the **systems analysis of agricultural systems**. The bar is not "a new
result for crop X" — it is **"a systems question about interactions and trade-offs."** Use this skill to
pressure-test fit before you invest, and to keep a field trial from being mistaken for a systems paper.
## When to trigger
- Choosing among possible projects or framings for an AgSy submission
- A reviewer/colleague said the paper "is just a field trial" or "lacks a systems angle"
- Deciding between a **research paper** and a **short communication**
- Considering a **perspective** (forward-looking opinion) or a **comment** on a published paper
## The AgSy fit test
A strong AgSy paper usually clears all four:
1. **A real systems question.** The object is **interactions** — among components (crop–soil–livestock–
economics), across hierarchical levels, between agriculture and other land uses, or with the
natural/social/economic environment. If nothing interacts, it is not a systems paper.
2. **Whole-farm to food-system scope (preferred).** AgSy gives preference to **whole-farm and
landscape-level** issues. A plot-level result needs to be scaled or embedded in a larger system.
3. **Integrated modelling and trade-offs.** Conceptual + empirical + **dynamic / bio-economic
modelling**; the analysis surfaces **trade-offs and synergies**, not a single optimal number.
4. **Decision relevance.** The result informs a design, management, or policy choice (see
`agsy-impact-and-implications`).
## Scale & system-boundary framing (state your system explicitly)
| If your work is at… | reach AgSy fit by… |
|---------------------|---------------------|
| Field / plot | scaling to the farm or showing the field-level interaction that matters to the system |
| Whole-farm | the journal's sweet spot — show component interactions and whole-farm trade-offs |
| Landscape / region | spatial interactions, land-use competition, aggregation/emergence across farms |
| Food system | linking production to value chains, food security, environment, and policy |
## Article-type choice
- **Research paper** — full systems study, **~8,000 words** (no hard cap; stay near it).
- **Short communication** — one crisp systems result, **~4,000 words**. Do not pad it into a paper.
- **Perspective** — a forward-looking argument about agricultural-systems science, **~2,000 words**,
**rapid review** (see `agsy-review-process`).
- **Comment** — a focused response to a published AgSy paper, **~1,000 words**.
## Anti-patterns
- A single-factor field trial with no interactions, model, or trade-off (off-fit — send to an agronomy journal)
- "First time simulated in country X" as the whole contribution (descriptive, not a systems advance)
- A model demo with no agricultural-systems question or decision payoff
- Choosing research-paper length out of habit when a short communication would land harder
## Output format
```
【Question】one sentence (state the interaction / trade-off)
【System & boundary】components + hierarchical level(s) + scale
【Modelling approach】conceptual / empirical / dynamic / bio-economic
【Decision relevance】who acts differently if this is true
【Article type】Research paper / Short communication / Perspective / Comment / Review
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】agsy-literature-positioning
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — systems models and data sources by scale
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — AgSy aims, scope, and article types
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!