Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, ORCID, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Scanned 6/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill agsy-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agsy Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-agsy-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agsy-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, ORCID, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---
# Submission Preflight (agsy-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on **Editorial Manager**. AgSy is **single anonymized**, so there
is no manuscript-anonymization step — but the front matter (abstract, Highlights, graphical abstract,
declarations) and the data/code/model availability statement are where avoidable failures happen.
Verify volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.
## When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata Editorial Manager expects
- Confirming the article type's guideline length is met and all front matter is prepared
## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- **Publisher:** Elsevier (ISSN 0308-521X print / 1873-2267 online).
- **Portal:** **Editorial Manager** (legacy `ees.elsevier.com/agsy` redirects there — confirm current URL).
- **Review model:** **single anonymized** — no manuscript anonymization required (待核实).
- **Article types:** Research paper (~8,000 words), Short communication (~4,000), Perspective (~2,000,
rapid review), Comment (~1,000), Review (verify) — no hard word cap, but stay near the guideline.
- **Abstract:** **≤ 250 words.**
- **Highlights** + **graphical abstract:** prepared.
- **Declarations:** **CRediT** author-contribution statement; **declaration of competing interest**;
**ORCID** for authors.
- **Data/code/model:** repository deposit + data-availability statement (Elsevier research-data policy).
- **Fee:** subscription journal with a hybrid Gold OA option; confirm any APC after acceptance (待核实).
## Preflight checklist
### Article type & length
- [ ] Article type chosen; length near its guideline (research ~8,000 / short comm ~4,000 / perspective ~2,000 / comment ~1,000)
- [ ] Abstract ≤ 250 words; states purpose, principal results, major conclusions
- [ ] Highlights drafted; graphical abstract prepared
### Systems content (fit)
- [ ] The systems question (interactions / hierarchical levels / trade-offs) is explicit
- [ ] Model described, calibrated, and independently evaluated; sensitivity/uncertainty reported
- [ ] Decision / management / policy relevance stated (see `agsy-impact-and-implications`)
### Format & declarations
- [ ] References in the journal's style; consistent throughout
- [ ] **CRediT** roles + **declaration of competing interest** completed
- [ ] **ORCID** for authors; corresponding author and contact details correct
- [ ] Figures/tables self-contained and accessible (see `agsy-figures-and-tables`)
### Data, code & compliance
- [ ] Data + code + model deposited; **data-availability statement** in the manuscript
(see `agsy-reproducibility-and-data-policy`)
- [ ] Ethics / funding / conflict declarations complete
- [ ] Original work; preprint status checked against Elsevier sharing policy
## Anti-patterns
- Abstract over 250 words; missing Highlights or graphical abstract
- No CRediT / competing-interest statement; missing ORCID
- A single-factor field trial sent to a systems journal (fit failure — see `agsy-review-process`)
- A black-box model with no calibration/evaluation or no data/code/model deposit
- Sending a full study to the Perspective track (wrong type and length)
## Output format
```
【Article type】Research / Short comm / Perspective / Comment / Review (length near guideline? Y/N)
【Abstract】word count (≤250); Highlights + graphical abstract? [Y/N]
【Systems content】question + model + evaluation + decision relevance? [Y/N]
【Declarations】CRediT + COI + ORCID? [Y/N]
【Data/code/model】deposited + availability statement? [Y/N]
【References】journal style consistent? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → agsy-revision-and-rebuttal on revision
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — reference managers, typesetting, repositories
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official AgSy URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!