Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers, observed-vs-simulated fit, resource flows, and conceptual system diagrams — not just a bar chart of one treatment. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
Scanned 6/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill agsy-figures-and-tables --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agsy Figures And Tables?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-agsy-figures-and-tables)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agsy-figures-and-tables
description: Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers, observed-vs-simulated fit, resource flows, and conceptual system diagrams — not just a bar chart of one treatment. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
---
# Figures & Tables (agsy-figures-and-tables)
Exhibits are where a systems reviewer checks whether the model and the trade-offs are real. At AgSy the
strongest exhibits make **interactions, dynamics, and trade-offs** visible, and let a reader judge
**model performance** at a glance. A wall of single-treatment bar charts does not belong in a systems
paper.
## When to trigger
- Designing the main results figure or a key model-performance exhibit
- Deciding what belongs in the article vs. supplementary material
- A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, mislabeled, or not self-contained
- Presenting scenario comparisons or trade-offs
## Principles
1. **Self-contained.** A reader should understand each exhibit from its caption, axis/column labels, and
note alone. State units, system level (field/farm/landscape/region), scenario, N, and time horizon.
2. **Show the system, not one factor.** Prefer exhibits that reveal interactions and trade-offs:
- **Trade-off / Pareto-front** plots (e.g., profit vs. N leaching across options)
- **Observed-vs-simulated (1:1)** plots with fit statistics (RMSE/NSE/bias) for model evaluation
- **Time series** of state variables to show dynamics and feedbacks
- **Sankey / flow** diagrams for resource, nutrient, or energy flows
- **Conceptual system diagrams** (boxes/arrows) for boundaries and components
- **Multi-indicator / radar** profiles for sustainability comparisons
3. **Show uncertainty.** Intervals, ensemble ranges, or boxplots — not bare point estimates from a
single model run.
4. **Accessible.** Colorblind-safe palettes; legible in grayscale; no chartjunk or 3D; vector output
(PDF/EPS) for print.
5. **Reproducible.** Each exhibit is generated by the master workflow; numbers match the deposited
data/code/model exactly (see `agsy-reproducibility-and-data-policy`).
## Article vs. supplementary
- Keep the few exhibits that carry the systems argument (trade-offs, key dynamics, model fit) in the
article; move full calibration tables, parameter lists, and exhaustive scenario grids to
**supplementary material**.
## Anti-patterns
- A single-treatment bar chart presented as the main result of a "systems" paper
- Observed-vs-simulated shown without fit statistics, or fit statistics with no plot
- Scenario tables that bury the trade-off instead of plotting the frontier
- Point estimates from one model run with no uncertainty shown
- Color-only encoding that fails in grayscale or for colorblind readers
- Exhibit numbers/values that don't match the deposited model output
## Output format
```
【Main exhibit】what system interaction / trade-off / fit it shows
【Type】trade-off frontier / 1:1 / time series / flow diagram / system diagram / radar
【Self-contained?】caption + labels + units + level + scenario + N? [Y/N]
【Uncertainty shown?】intervals / ensemble / boxplot? [Y/N]
【Article vs supplementary】split decided
【Reproducible?】generated by master workflow, matches package? [Y/N]
【Next】agsy-writing-style
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — plotting, flow-diagram, and mapping tools for systems exhibits
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — Highlights / graphical-abstract requirements
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!