Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode logistics.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill acl-camera-ready --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Acl Camera Ready?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-acl-camera-ready)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: acl-camera-ready
description: Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode logistics.
---
# ACL Camera Ready
Use this after ACL (or Findings of ACL) acceptance. Camera-ready quality
controls how the paper looks forever in the ACL Anthology, which is the
permanent open-access record. For ACL 2026 the camera-ready deadline was
April 19, 2026 — confirm the current edition's date in the acceptance email
before planning anything.
## The extra page and what it is for
- Accepted \*ACL papers traditionally receive one additional content page:
long papers up to 9 pages, short papers up to 5. The page exists to address
reviewer and meta-review comments, not to smuggle in a new contribution.
- Spend it in priority order: fixes the meta-review asked for, clarifications
reviewers requested, then de-anonymization overhead (author block,
acknowledgements) which consumes real space.
- References remain unlimited; the Limitations section remains **mandatory**
in the camera-ready and still sits outside the page count.
## De-anonymization pass
- Restore authors, affiliations, and acknowledgements; convert third-person
self-citations ("Smith showed") back to natural first person where clearer.
- Replace anonymous supplement links with the permanent public repository,
dataset page, or model card; test every URL logged out.
- Add the funding and AI-assistance acknowledgements: ACL policy requires
generative-AI use beyond polishing to be disclosed, with details in the
Acknowledgements matching your Responsible NLP checklist answers.
## Anthology-facing metadata
| Item | Why it matters at ACL | Common error |
|---|---|---|
| Title/abstract in the form | Becomes the Anthology landing page | Unicode or LaTeX macros pasted raw |
| Author names + order | Permanent citation record, BibTeX for everyone | Name spelled differently than prior papers |
| PDF fonts embedded | Anthology archival requirement | Missing Type-1/TrueType embedding from figures |
| License acceptance | Anthology publishes under CC BY 4.0 (post-2016 policy) | Assuming you can restrict reuse later |
| Video/poster uploads | Linked from the Anthology page when provided | Skipped, losing visibility |
Publication in the Anthology is open access with no author fee; ACL's cost
model is conference registration, not APCs.
## Integrating reviewer-mandated changes
Work from the meta-review, not memory:
1. Extract every "should," "must," and "the authors agreed to" from the
meta-review and discussion thread into a checklist.
2. Map each to an edit: new sentence, moved table, scoped claim, added
citation. The accepted contribution must not silently grow — a stronger
claim than reviewers evaluated is an integrity problem, not a bonus.
3. Keep section and table numbering stable where possible so the review
record still points at the right objects.
4. Re-run the checklist consistency pass: if you promised error bars or a
contamination note in discussion, the camera-ready must contain it.
## Main conference vs Findings logistics
- Findings papers are full peer-reviewed publications in the Anthology but are
typically not part of the main oral program; presentation options (Findings
poster sessions, workshop presentation slots, videos) vary per edition —
check the current conference's Findings instructions rather than assuming.
- Registration and presentation expectations differ by track and edition; ACL
2026 ran as a hybrid conference in San Diego (July 2-7, 2026). Verify the
current attendance requirement before booking or skipping travel.
## Camera-ready week runbook
```text
Day 1: meta-review edit checklist; claim-scope audit
Day 2: de-anonymize; acknowledgements incl. funding + AI disclosure
Day 3: public artifact links live; README + license on the repo
Day 4: rebuild with final style; font embedding + page-count check
Day 5: metadata form; abstract matches PDF; submit and archive everything
```
## Common camera-ready rejections and rework requests
- Unembedded fonts from matplotlib or Inkscape figures — regenerate with
embedding forced rather than patching the PDF.
- Title case mismatch between the form and the PDF, or LaTeX math left in
the plain-text abstract field.
- Author list drift: an author added or reordered after review needs chair
approval, not a silent metadata edit.
- Limitations section deleted "for space" — it is still required and still
free; removing it can bounce the paper at publication checks.
- Non-resolving artifact URLs: the Anthology page will outlive your lab
server; prefer archived, versioned hosting for the link of record.
## If the paper landed in Findings
- The Anthology volume is "Findings of the Association for Computational
Linguistics: ACL <year>" — cite and list it that way; miscrediting your
own venue tier propagates into others' bibliographies.
- Camera-ready mechanics are the same as main-conference papers, extra page
included; deadlines are usually shared — confirm in the decision letter.
- Ask early which presentation options the edition offers Findings papers
(poster session, affiliated workshop slot, video); slots can require
separate sign-up shortly after notification.
## Presentation assets riding the same deadline window
- Poster/slide templates, video-upload requirements, and session-format
details arrive with or shortly after camera-ready instructions; the
video deadline is often earlier than authors expect.
- Registration typically must be completed by a named author before the
paper is scheduled — check the decision email for the binding rule.
- Book the error budget: font, metadata, and form rejections bounce back
days later, so submitting on the deadline hour forfeits the retry.
## Output format
```text
[Camera-ready status] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Meta-review edits] <requested change -> edit made>
[Extra-page budget] <what the added space was spent on>
[De-anonymization + disclosure] <authors/acks/AI-use/links status>
[Anthology package] <PDF/metadata/license/artifact links>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!