Use when preparing an accepted AAMAS paper for the IFAAMAS open-access camera-ready, covering author de-anonymization, proceedings metadata, two-column reflow of game figures and learning curves, resolving rebuttal-stage promises, registration, in-person presentation, and the public code and environment release for a multiagent paper.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-camera-ready --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aamas Camera Ready?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-aamas-camera-ready)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aamas-camera-ready
description: Use when preparing an accepted AAMAS paper for the IFAAMAS open-access camera-ready, covering author de-anonymization, proceedings metadata, two-column reflow of game figures and learning curves, resolving rebuttal-stage promises, registration, in-person presentation, and the public code and environment release for a multiagent paper.
---
# AAMAS Camera Ready
Use this after acceptance. Reopen the current AAMAS camera-ready instructions, the proceedings
author kit, the registration page, and the decision notice before advising authors; AAMAS
proceedings are published open-access by IFAAMAS.
## Camera-ready audit
- Convert the anonymous submission to the public version: author names, affiliations,
acknowledgements, funding, and de-anonymized code, data, and environment links.
- Apply the current final-page rules and template. Confirm whether the accepted-paper mode
changes the page budget from the 8-page submission body, and reflow accordingly.
- Check proceedings metadata: title, abstract, author order and ORCID, subject areas,
bibliography, and any required copyright or release form.
- Integrate every rebuttal-stage promise without expanding the accepted contribution: a
wording fix, a moved assumption, or an added caption line - not a new experiment.
- Prepare the public artifact: repository, multiagent environments, opponent/population sets,
seeds, checkpoints, and an archival citation, now that anonymity no longer applies.
- Confirm registration and in-person presentation obligations for at least one author.
## Anonymous-to-final flip: what to recheck
| Element | Submission (anonymous) | Camera-ready (final) |
|---|---|---|
| Page one | Tracking number, no author block | Author names, affiliations, ORCID |
| Acknowledgements / funding | Removed | Restored |
| Code / environment links | Anonymized placeholder | Public, licensed, citable archive |
| Self-citation phrasing | "prior work [anon]" | Natural first-person, de-anonymized |
| Page budget | 8-page body | Confirm the accepted-paper budget, then reflow |
## Two-column reflow for multiagent papers
- Switching the style file from anonymous to final mode changes spacing; recheck every page
break, figure placement, and table width after the flip.
- Extensive-form game trees, payoff matrices, and multi-panel learning curves often need
full-width spans; verify nothing is clipped at the column boundary.
- Material that fit under the tracking number can overflow once the author block and
acknowledgements are added; confirm rather than assume the budget absorbs it.
- Keep theorem, assumption, and game-definition numbering identical to the reviewed version so
the public reviews on OpenReview remain traceable to the final text.
## De-anonymization sweep
- Restore the author block, acknowledgements, grants, and contribution statements the
anonymous version stripped.
- Rewrite anonymized self-citations ("prior work [anon]") into natural first-person form.
- Replace anonymized repository placeholders with the public, licensed, citable archive, and
test every link and every environment install from a logged-out machine.
## Worked example: honoring a rebuttal promise
The area chair accepted on the condition that the paper add a held-out opponent to the
evaluation, which the rebuttal promised. Camera-ready move: add the one opponent, report it
with the same seeds and standard errors as the others, and add a sentence to the protocol -
without re-tuning the method or re-framing the contribution the reviewers evaluated.
## Hedged logistics
- Registration pricing, copyright-form mechanics, the exact camera-ready date, and the
proceedings template can change every cycle; confirm against the decision notice and current
author kit.
## Output format
```text
[Camera-ready status] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Final package] <PDF/source/bib/metadata/forms/artifacts>
[Policy checks] <page/authors/presentation/registration/artifact release>
[Rebuttal-promise map] <promise -> final edit>
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!