Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAAI submission, should be reframed for AAAI, or should be routed to IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, ACL, CVPR, KDD, CHI, or another venue.
Scanned 6/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aaai Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-aaai-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: aaai-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAAI submission, should be reframed for AAAI, or should be routed to IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, ACL, CVPR, KDD, CHI, or another venue.
---
# AAAI Topic Selection
Use this while the project is still movable. AAAI is broad across artificial intelligence, so a
strong submission should make an AI contribution that is intelligible beyond a narrow subfield.
## Strong AAAI signals
- Clear AI problem and contribution: method, theory, system, benchmark, dataset, evaluation, social
impact, alignment, human-AI interaction, planning, reasoning, learning, NLP, vision, robotics, or
knowledge representation.
- Evidence that supports a general AI claim, not only a local application result.
- Responsible treatment of ethics, safety, privacy, fairness, social impact, or misuse when the
paper touches those areas.
- Reproducibility path strong enough for checklist scrutiny.
- Narrative clear enough for Phase 1 reviewers from adjacent AI areas.
## Weak AAAI signals
- Pure application deployment with little AI insight.
- Benchmark bump without mechanism, analysis, or robust comparison.
- Closed system with no reviewable evidence.
- Paper better framed as statistics, NLP, vision, HCI, robotics, or systems for a specialist venue.
- Policy-sensitive claims with thin ethics or stakeholder analysis.
## Routing logic
- Prefer IJCAI for broad AI work with an international AI community emphasis.
- Prefer NeurIPS, ICML, or ICLR for stronger ML method/theory or representation-learning framing.
- Prefer AISTATS or UAI for statistics, uncertainty, causal, or probabilistic emphasis.
- Prefer ACL, CVPR, KDD, CHI, ICRA, or systems venues when the contribution is domain-specific.
- Prefer a workshop if evidence is preliminary but the idea is timely.
## Output format
```text
[AAAI fit] strong / plausible / weak / no
[Track route] Main / AI for Social Impact / AI Alignment / other
[Core AI contribution] <one sentence>
[Evidence required] <experiment, theory, artifact, stakeholder analysis>
[Best venue route] AAAI / IJCAI / NeurIPS / ICML / ICLR / AISTATS / UAI / domain venue
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!