Calculate one sprint's metrics — velocity committed versus done, burndown pattern, cycle time, commitment ratio and outlier stories. Use when a sprint has just ended and the user wants its numbers and what they say about the team. Not for multi-sprint forecasts or a stakeholder update; see /project-management-velocity-analysis or /project-management-stakeholder-update.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Project Management Sprint Metrics?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bromso-project-management-sprint-metrics)
---
name: project-management-sprint-metrics
description: Calculate one sprint's metrics — velocity committed versus done, burndown pattern, cycle time, commitment ratio and outlier stories. Use when a sprint has just ended and the user wants its numbers and what they say about the team. Not for multi-sprint forecasts or a stakeholder update; see /project-management-velocity-analysis or /project-management-stakeholder-update.
metadata:
argument-hint: "[project] [--skip-checks]"
workflow: project-management
phase: 3
artifact: 03-review.md
---
# Sprint Metrics
Calculate and analyze sprint metrics for "$ARGUMENTS". Measure velocity, analyze burndown, calculate cycle time and commitment ratio, identify outlier stories, and generate trend recommendations.
**Arguments.** `$ARGUMENTS` may contain the project name and optional flags. Take the first token as `<project>` and treat `--skip-checks` as a flag; never include flags in file paths. All paths below use `<project>`. If `--skip-checks` is present, skip the prerequisite check and, **before writing any artifact**, append one line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl`: `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"skipped","artifact":"03-review.md","note":"<reason or \"none given\">"}`.
## Prerequisites
**Part of a workflow.** This skill is phase 3 (Review) of the Scrum workflow (`project-management`); cross-domain workflows run it too. First check `.singularskills/log.jsonl` for an open run for this project: a `run-started` line with `"project":"<project>"` and no later `run-finished` line for the same `workflow` and `project`. If one exists, the conductor is running you: continue here. Otherwise, if the user asked to start, run, continue or resume a process or workflow rather than this one step, do not continue here: invoke the `workflow` skill with the workflow the user asked for, or `project-management` when they named none, followed by `<project>`; it runs this phase in order, asks before it writes and records the run. Otherwise continue here: a later phase runs on its own, behind its gate.
Run this skill's gate before writing: `sh <this skill's folder>/scripts/gate.sh <project> <project root>`, where `<project root>` is the folder that contains `.singularskills/` (use `.` when you are already there). If it exits non-zero, stop and tell the user what it printed, unless `--skip-checks` was given (see Arguments). On a refusal, before you stop, append this line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl` (create the folder and file if missing): `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"refused","artifact":"03-review.md","note":"<what the gate printed>"}`. Once the gate has passed, or under `--skip-checks` once you have appended the `skipped` line, append this line before you start work: `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"started","artifact":"03-review.md","note":""}`.
Check that `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/00-initiate.md` exists. If it does not, tell the user to run an Initiate skill first (e.g., project-charter) and stop.
## Process
1. **Read existing context:**
- Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/00-initiate.md` for project context and team setup
- Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/03-review.md` if it exists (for sprint review and completed stories)
- Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/02-sprint.md` if it exists (for sprint state, standup history, and daily progress)
- Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/01-plan.md` if it exists (for sprint backlog, estimates, and velocity targets)
2. **Calculate velocity:**
- Count total story points completed this sprint (only stories that met their definition of done)
- Do not count partially completed stories — they carry over to the next sprint at full points
- Note the committed velocity (what was planned) vs. actual velocity (what was delivered)
- Express velocity as a single number: X story points completed in this sprint
3. **Compare velocity to last 3-5 sprints:**
- If historical sprint data is available, list velocity for each of the last 3-5 sprints
- Calculate the average velocity across those sprints
- Calculate the velocity trend: improving (upward over 3+ sprints), declining (downward over 3+ sprints), or stable (within +/- 10% of average)
- If this sprint's velocity is significantly different from the average (more than 20% higher or lower), note the likely cause
- If no historical data is available, note this as the baseline sprint and skip trend analysis
4. **Analyze burndown:**
- Compare actual burndown to ideal burndown line (linear from total points to zero over sprint days)
- Identify patterns in the burndown:
- **Flat start:** no points completed in the first few days (stories too large, slow ramp-up)
- **Cliff at end:** most points completed in the last 1-2 days (stories not broken down enough, deadline pressure)
- **Scope increase:** total points went up mid-sprint (late additions, scope creep)
- **Smooth decline:** steady progress throughout (healthy sprint)
- Note any scope changes: stories added or removed mid-sprint, with the reason
- Calculate the gap between actual and ideal burndown at the midpoint of the sprint
5. **Calculate cycle time per story:**
- For each completed story, calculate days from "in progress" to "done"
- Calculate the average cycle time across all completed stories
- Calculate the median cycle time (less affected by outliers than the average)
- Break down cycle time by phase if data is available: development time, review time, testing time
- Compare cycle time to story size: do larger stories (more points) take proportionally longer?
6. **Calculate commitment ratio:**
- Commitment ratio = (completed story points / committed story points) x 100%
- Interpret the ratio:
- **> 100%:** team completed more than committed (stretch goals pulled in, or undercommitted)
- **80-100%:** healthy range, team is committing accurately
- **60-80%:** underperforming, investigate causes (overcommitment, blockers, estimation issues)
- **< 60%:** significant gap, sprint was disrupted or estimates were far off
- Compare to previous sprints' commitment ratios to see if accuracy is improving
7. **Identify outlier stories:**
- Find stories that took significantly longer than estimated (actual cycle time > 2x expected)
- For each outlier, document: the story, estimated vs. actual effort, and the root cause
- Common causes: unclear requirements, unexpected technical complexity, dependency delays, scope expansion
- Find stories completed much faster than estimated (actual < 0.5x expected) — these suggest overestimation
- Use outlier analysis to improve future estimation accuracy
8. **Generate trend recommendations:**
- Based on all metrics, provide 3-5 actionable recommendations:
- If velocity is declining: investigate causes (team changes, technical debt, morale)
- If commitment ratio is consistently low: reduce sprint scope or improve estimation
- If cycle time is increasing: break stories smaller, reduce WIP, improve review speed
- If burndown shows cliff pattern: encourage daily progress, break stories into smaller tasks
- If scope changes are frequent: improve sprint planning and protect the sprint backlog
- Prioritize recommendations by impact on team effectiveness
- Note what is going well — metrics are not just about finding problems
9. **Write the artifact** — append to `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/03-review.md` under a `## Sprint Metrics` section. Create the file with a `# Review — <project>` heading if it does not exist; if a `## Sprint Metrics` section already exists, replace only that section. The section contains:
- **Velocity** — this sprint's velocity, committed vs. actual
- **Velocity Trend** — comparison to last 3-5 sprints with trend classification
- **Burndown Analysis** — actual vs. ideal burndown pattern and observations
- **Cycle Time** — average and median cycle time per story, breakdown by phase if available
- **Commitment Ratio** — percentage with interpretation and trend
- **Outlier Stories** — stories that deviated significantly from estimates with root causes
- **Trend Recommendations** — 3-5 actionable recommendations based on metrics
## Output
Sprint metrics appended to `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/03-review.md`. Present a summary highlighting:
- Sprint velocity (actual vs. committed)
- Velocity trend (improving/declining/stable)
- Average cycle time per story
- Commitment ratio with interpretation
- Top recommendation for improving team effectiveness
**Record the run.** After you have written your section, append this line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl` (the `started` line of Prerequisites, with `"event":"finished"`): `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"finished","artifact":"03-review.md","note":""}`.
This artifact is shared by every skill of phase 3 (Review). The frontmatter is written once, by whoever creates the file: if you create it, open it with the block below (`skill` is the phase title, `started` the time of that first write; `gate` is `passed` when the gate ran clean and `skipped` under `--skip-checks`); if it already exists, leave the block alone except to update `finished` and to set `gate` to the worst value among the sections (`skipped` over `passed`).
```yaml
---
skill: Review
workflow: project-management
phase: 3
project: <project>
started: <ISO timestamp>
finished: <ISO timestamp>
agent: <the agent you run in, or "unknown">
gate: <passed|skipped>
---
```
Open your `## Sprint Metrics` section with one italic line, `*<skill name> · <ISO timestamp> · gate: <passed|skipped>*` (your skill name is `project-management-sprint-metrics`).
End your section with `### Decisions` and `### Open questions` (one level under your `## Sprint Metrics` heading, so the section stays one block), in this shape:
```markdown
### Decisions
- <what was chosen> — <why> — <what was rejected>
### Open questions
- <what the next phase or a reviewer must settle>
```