Skip to content
Back to skills

Project Management Sprint Metrics

ASecurity

Calculate one sprint's metrics — velocity committed versus done, burndown pattern, cycle time, commitment ratio and outlier stories. Use when a sprint has just ended and the user wants its numbers and what they say about the team. Not for multi-sprint forecasts or a stakeholder update; see /project-management-velocity-analysis or /project-management-stakeholder-update.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
ai-agentsgoexpresstesting

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add bromso/singularskills --skill project-management-sprint-metrics --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Project Management Sprint Metrics?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Project Management Sprint Metrics
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bromso-project-management-sprint-metrics/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bromso-project-management-sprint-metrics)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: project-management-sprint-metrics
description: Calculate one sprint's metrics — velocity committed versus done, burndown pattern, cycle time, commitment ratio and outlier stories. Use when a sprint has just ended and the user wants its numbers and what they say about the team. Not for multi-sprint forecasts or a stakeholder update; see /project-management-velocity-analysis or /project-management-stakeholder-update.
metadata:
  argument-hint: "[project] [--skip-checks]"
  workflow: project-management
  phase: 3
  artifact: 03-review.md
---

# Sprint Metrics

Calculate and analyze sprint metrics for "$ARGUMENTS". Measure velocity, analyze burndown, calculate cycle time and commitment ratio, identify outlier stories, and generate trend recommendations.

**Arguments.** `$ARGUMENTS` may contain the project name and optional flags. Take the first token as `<project>` and treat `--skip-checks` as a flag; never include flags in file paths. All paths below use `<project>`. If `--skip-checks` is present, skip the prerequisite check and, **before writing any artifact**, append one line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl`: `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"skipped","artifact":"03-review.md","note":"<reason or \"none given\">"}`.

## Prerequisites

**Part of a workflow.** This skill is phase 3 (Review) of the Scrum workflow (`project-management`); cross-domain workflows run it too. First check `.singularskills/log.jsonl` for an open run for this project: a `run-started` line with `"project":"<project>"` and no later `run-finished` line for the same `workflow` and `project`. If one exists, the conductor is running you: continue here. Otherwise, if the user asked to start, run, continue or resume a process or workflow rather than this one step, do not continue here: invoke the `workflow` skill with the workflow the user asked for, or `project-management` when they named none, followed by `<project>`; it runs this phase in order, asks before it writes and records the run. Otherwise continue here: a later phase runs on its own, behind its gate.

Run this skill's gate before writing: `sh <this skill's folder>/scripts/gate.sh <project> <project root>`, where `<project root>` is the folder that contains `.singularskills/` (use `.` when you are already there). If it exits non-zero, stop and tell the user what it printed, unless `--skip-checks` was given (see Arguments). On a refusal, before you stop, append this line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl` (create the folder and file if missing): `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"refused","artifact":"03-review.md","note":"<what the gate printed>"}`. Once the gate has passed, or under `--skip-checks` once you have appended the `skipped` line, append this line before you start work: `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"started","artifact":"03-review.md","note":""}`.

Check that `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/00-initiate.md` exists. If it does not, tell the user to run an Initiate skill first (e.g., project-charter) and stop.

## Process

1. **Read existing context:**
   - Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/00-initiate.md` for project context and team setup
   - Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/03-review.md` if it exists (for sprint review and completed stories)
   - Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/02-sprint.md` if it exists (for sprint state, standup history, and daily progress)
   - Read `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/01-plan.md` if it exists (for sprint backlog, estimates, and velocity targets)

2. **Calculate velocity:**
   - Count total story points completed this sprint (only stories that met their definition of done)
   - Do not count partially completed stories — they carry over to the next sprint at full points
   - Note the committed velocity (what was planned) vs. actual velocity (what was delivered)
   - Express velocity as a single number: X story points completed in this sprint

3. **Compare velocity to last 3-5 sprints:**
   - If historical sprint data is available, list velocity for each of the last 3-5 sprints
   - Calculate the average velocity across those sprints
   - Calculate the velocity trend: improving (upward over 3+ sprints), declining (downward over 3+ sprints), or stable (within +/- 10% of average)
   - If this sprint's velocity is significantly different from the average (more than 20% higher or lower), note the likely cause
   - If no historical data is available, note this as the baseline sprint and skip trend analysis

4. **Analyze burndown:**
   - Compare actual burndown to ideal burndown line (linear from total points to zero over sprint days)
   - Identify patterns in the burndown:
     - **Flat start:** no points completed in the first few days (stories too large, slow ramp-up)
     - **Cliff at end:** most points completed in the last 1-2 days (stories not broken down enough, deadline pressure)
     - **Scope increase:** total points went up mid-sprint (late additions, scope creep)
     - **Smooth decline:** steady progress throughout (healthy sprint)
   - Note any scope changes: stories added or removed mid-sprint, with the reason
   - Calculate the gap between actual and ideal burndown at the midpoint of the sprint

5. **Calculate cycle time per story:**
   - For each completed story, calculate days from "in progress" to "done"
   - Calculate the average cycle time across all completed stories
   - Calculate the median cycle time (less affected by outliers than the average)
   - Break down cycle time by phase if data is available: development time, review time, testing time
   - Compare cycle time to story size: do larger stories (more points) take proportionally longer?

6. **Calculate commitment ratio:**
   - Commitment ratio = (completed story points / committed story points) x 100%
   - Interpret the ratio:
     - **> 100%:** team completed more than committed (stretch goals pulled in, or undercommitted)
     - **80-100%:** healthy range, team is committing accurately
     - **60-80%:** underperforming, investigate causes (overcommitment, blockers, estimation issues)
     - **< 60%:** significant gap, sprint was disrupted or estimates were far off
   - Compare to previous sprints' commitment ratios to see if accuracy is improving

7. **Identify outlier stories:**
   - Find stories that took significantly longer than estimated (actual cycle time > 2x expected)
   - For each outlier, document: the story, estimated vs. actual effort, and the root cause
   - Common causes: unclear requirements, unexpected technical complexity, dependency delays, scope expansion
   - Find stories completed much faster than estimated (actual < 0.5x expected) — these suggest overestimation
   - Use outlier analysis to improve future estimation accuracy

8. **Generate trend recommendations:**
   - Based on all metrics, provide 3-5 actionable recommendations:
     - If velocity is declining: investigate causes (team changes, technical debt, morale)
     - If commitment ratio is consistently low: reduce sprint scope or improve estimation
     - If cycle time is increasing: break stories smaller, reduce WIP, improve review speed
     - If burndown shows cliff pattern: encourage daily progress, break stories into smaller tasks
     - If scope changes are frequent: improve sprint planning and protect the sprint backlog
   - Prioritize recommendations by impact on team effectiveness
   - Note what is going well — metrics are not just about finding problems

9. **Write the artifact** — append to `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/03-review.md` under a `## Sprint Metrics` section. Create the file with a `# Review — <project>` heading if it does not exist; if a `## Sprint Metrics` section already exists, replace only that section. The section contains:
   - **Velocity** — this sprint's velocity, committed vs. actual
   - **Velocity Trend** — comparison to last 3-5 sprints with trend classification
   - **Burndown Analysis** — actual vs. ideal burndown pattern and observations
   - **Cycle Time** — average and median cycle time per story, breakdown by phase if available
   - **Commitment Ratio** — percentage with interpretation and trend
   - **Outlier Stories** — stories that deviated significantly from estimates with root causes
   - **Trend Recommendations** — 3-5 actionable recommendations based on metrics

## Output

Sprint metrics appended to `.singularskills/project-management/<project>/03-review.md`. Present a summary highlighting:
- Sprint velocity (actual vs. committed)
- Velocity trend (improving/declining/stable)
- Average cycle time per story
- Commitment ratio with interpretation
- Top recommendation for improving team effectiveness

**Record the run.** After you have written your section, append this line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl` (the `started` line of Prerequisites, with `"event":"finished"`): `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"project-management-sprint-metrics","workflow":"project-management","phase":3,"project":"<project>","event":"finished","artifact":"03-review.md","note":""}`.

This artifact is shared by every skill of phase 3 (Review). The frontmatter is written once, by whoever creates the file: if you create it, open it with the block below (`skill` is the phase title, `started` the time of that first write; `gate` is `passed` when the gate ran clean and `skipped` under `--skip-checks`); if it already exists, leave the block alone except to update `finished` and to set `gate` to the worst value among the sections (`skipped` over `passed`).

```yaml
---
skill: Review
workflow: project-management
phase: 3
project: <project>
started: <ISO timestamp>
finished: <ISO timestamp>
agent: <the agent you run in, or "unknown">
gate: <passed|skipped>
---
```

Open your `## Sprint Metrics` section with one italic line, `*<skill name> · <ISO timestamp> · gate: <passed|skipped>*` (your skill name is `project-management-sprint-metrics`).

End your section with `### Decisions` and `### Open questions` (one level under your `## Sprint Metrics` heading, so the section stays one block), in this shape:

```markdown
### Decisions
- <what was chosen> — <why> — <what was rejected>

### Open questions
- <what the next phase or a reviewer must settle>
```

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md10.4 KB
  • scripts/gate.sh1.1 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.