Skip to content
Back to skills

Materiality

ASecurity

Determine significance thresholds for reporting and adjustment decisions

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
ai-agentstestingperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill materiality --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Materiality?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Materiality
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bromso-materiality/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bromso-materiality)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
description: Determine significance thresholds for reporting and adjustment decisions
---

# Materiality

Determine materiality thresholds for "$ARGUMENTS". Establish quantitative and qualitative benchmarks to guide which items require adjustment, disclosure, or further investigation.

## Prerequisites

None — utility skill, run anytime. Most effective after Phase 4 (trial balance) or Phase 7 (statements) when financial totals are available.

## Process

1. **Select materiality benchmarks:**
   - Common quantitative benchmarks:
     - 5-10% of pre-tax income (for-profit entities)
     - 0.5-1% of total revenue
     - 0.5-1% of total assets
     - 1-2% of total equity
   - Choose the benchmark most relevant to the entity's circumstances
   - For nonprofits, consider total expenses or total contributions

2. **Calculate materiality levels:**
   - **Overall materiality** — the threshold for the financial statements as a whole
   - **Performance materiality** — a reduced threshold (typically 50-75% of overall) used during testing to allow for undetected misstatements
   - **Trivial threshold** — below this amount, items are clearly inconsequential (typically 5% of overall materiality)

3. **Apply qualitative factors:**
   - Even below quantitative thresholds, items may be material if they:
     - Involve fraud or illegal acts
     - Affect compliance with debt covenants or regulatory requirements
     - Change a trend (e.g., turn a profit into a loss)
     - Affect management compensation or bonuses
     - Involve related-party transactions
     - Were previously communicated as significant

4. **Document materiality decisions:**
   - Apply thresholds to known misstatements and adjustments
   - Recommend which items to adjust and which to pass on
   - Aggregate unadjusted items and assess whether the total is material

5. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/accounting/$ARGUMENTS/materiality.md` with sections:
   - **Materiality Calculation** — benchmark selected, base amount, and computed thresholds
   - **Qualitative Factors** — additional considerations that could lower thresholds
   - **Application** — list of items evaluated against materiality with adjust/pass recommendation
   - **Summary of Unadjusted Differences** — items passed on and their aggregate effect

## Output

The materiality assessment written to `.metapowers/accounting/$ARGUMENTS/materiality.md`. Present a summary highlighting:
- Overall and performance materiality thresholds
- Number of items evaluated
- Recommendations to adjust vs. pass

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.