Skip to content
Back to skills

Legal Regulatory Updates

ASecurity

Plan implementation of a specific new or amended law — impact rating, dated timeline, owners, resources and items for counsel to review. Use when a new or amended law takes effect soon and the user needs a dated plan with owners to be ready for it. Not for ongoing monitoring of regulatory change; see /compliance-regulatory-watch.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
ai-agentsgotestingdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add bromso/singularskills --skill legal-regulatory-updates --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Legal Regulatory Updates?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Legal Regulatory Updates
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bromso-legal-regulatory-updates/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bromso-legal-regulatory-updates)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: legal-regulatory-updates
description: Plan implementation of a specific new or amended law — impact rating, dated timeline, owners, resources and items for counsel to review. Use when a new or amended law takes effect soon and the user needs a dated plan with owners to be ready for it. Not for ongoing monitoring of regulatory change; see /compliance-regulatory-watch.
metadata:
  argument-hint: "[project] [--skip-checks]"
  workflow: legal
  phase: 4
  artifact: 04-govern.md
---

# Regulatory Updates

Track and assess the impact of new or changing regulations for "$ARGUMENTS". Research recent regulatory changes, assess their impact on current compliance posture, and create implementation timelines.

> **Note:** AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.

**Arguments.** `$ARGUMENTS` may contain the project name and optional flags. Take the first token as `<project>` and treat `--skip-checks` as a flag; never include flags in file paths. All paths below use `<project>`. If `--skip-checks` is present, skip the prerequisite check and, **before writing any artifact**, append one line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl`: `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"legal-regulatory-updates","workflow":"legal","phase":4,"project":"<project>","event":"skipped","artifact":"04-govern.md","note":"<reason or \"none given\">"}`.

## Prerequisites

**Part of a workflow.** This skill is phase 4 (Govern) of the Legal Lifecycle workflow (`legal`); cross-domain workflows run it too. First check `.singularskills/log.jsonl` for an open run for this project: a `run-started` line with `"project":"<project>"` and no later `run-finished` line for the same `workflow` and `project`. If one exists, the conductor is running you: continue here. Otherwise, if the user asked to start, run, continue or resume a process or workflow rather than this one step, do not continue here: invoke the `workflow` skill with the workflow the user asked for, or `legal` when they named none, followed by `<project>`; it runs this phase in order, asks before it writes and records the run. Otherwise continue here: a later phase runs on its own, behind its gate.

Run this skill's gate before writing: `sh <this skill's folder>/scripts/gate.sh <project> <project root>`, where `<project root>` is the folder that contains `.singularskills/` (use `.` when you are already there). If it exits non-zero, stop and tell the user what it printed, unless `--skip-checks` was given (see Arguments). On a refusal, before you stop, append this line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl` (create the folder and file if missing): `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"legal-regulatory-updates","workflow":"legal","phase":4,"project":"<project>","event":"refused","artifact":"04-govern.md","note":"<what the gate printed>"}`. Once the gate has passed, or under `--skip-checks` once you have appended the `skipped` line, append this line before you start work: `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"legal-regulatory-updates","workflow":"legal","phase":4,"project":"<project>","event":"started","artifact":"04-govern.md","note":""}`.

Check that `.singularskills/legal/<project>/00-assess.md` exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:

> "Run an Assess skill first (e.g. `/legal-risk-assessment <project>`) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."

## Process

1. **Read inputs:**
   - Read `.singularskills/legal/<project>/00-assess.md` for current regulatory landscape, jurisdiction, and compliance status
   - Review any existing compliance artifacts in `.singularskills/legal/<project>/`

2. **Research regulatory changes:**
   - Use WebSearch to find recent and upcoming regulatory changes relevant to "<project>"
   - Focus on the jurisdictions and regulation types identified in the assessment
   - Search for proposed legislation, final rules, guidance updates, and enforcement trends
   - Check regulatory body announcements, industry association updates, and legal news sources

3. **Summarize each regulatory change:**
   - **What is changing** — clear description of the new requirement or modification
   - **Effective date** — when the change takes effect or compliance is required
   - **Who it affects** — which teams, processes, or systems are impacted
   - **What action is needed** — specific steps required to comply

4. **Assess impact on current compliance:**
   - Rate each change as **High**, **Medium**, or **Low** impact:
     - **High** — requires significant process changes, new controls, or substantial investment
     - **Medium** — requires moderate adjustments to existing processes or policies
     - **Low** — requires minor updates or documentation changes
   - Map each change to existing controls and identify gaps

5. **Prioritize required changes:**
   - Rank by deadline urgency (nearest effective dates first)
   - Weight by impact severity (high-impact changes take priority)
   - Consider dependencies between changes
   - Flag any changes with penalties for non-compliance

6. **Create implementation timeline:**
   - For each required change, define milestones and target completion dates
   - Assign responsible owners for each implementation task
   - Identify resource requirements (budget, personnel, technology)
   - Build in buffer time for review and testing

7. **Flag items requiring legal counsel review:**
   - Ambiguous regulatory language requiring interpretation
   - Changes with significant financial or operational impact
   - Cross-jurisdictional conflicts or complexities
   - Novel regulatory requirements without established compliance patterns

8. **Recommend monitoring sources:**
   - **Regulatory bodies** — official government and agency websites
   - **Industry associations** — sector-specific compliance organizations
   - **Legal newsletters** — reputable legal update services
   - **Peer networks** — industry working groups and compliance forums
   - Suggest monitoring frequency for each source

9. **Write the artifact** — append to `.singularskills/legal/<project>/04-govern.md` under a `## Regulatory Updates` section. Create the file with a `# Govern — <project>` heading if it does not exist; if a `## Regulatory Updates` section already exists, replace only that section. The section contains:

   - **Regulatory Change Summary** — table of all identified changes with status
   - **Impact Assessment** — detailed analysis per change with severity rating
   - **Priority Matrix** — changes ranked by urgency and impact
   - **Implementation Timeline** — milestones, owners, and target dates
   - **Legal Counsel Review Items** — flagged items requiring attorney input
   - **Monitoring Sources** — recommended sources and review frequency

## Output

The regulatory updates appended to `.singularskills/legal/<project>/04-govern.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- Number of regulatory changes identified and their impact distribution
- Most urgent changes requiring immediate action
- Items flagged for legal counsel review
- Recommended monitoring cadence going forward

**Record the run.** After you have written your section, append this line to `.singularskills/log.jsonl` (the `started` line of Prerequisites, with `"event":"finished"`): `{"ts":"<ISO timestamp>","skill":"legal-regulatory-updates","workflow":"legal","phase":4,"project":"<project>","event":"finished","artifact":"04-govern.md","note":""}`.

This artifact is shared by every skill of phase 4 (Govern). The frontmatter is written once, by whoever creates the file: if you create it, open it with the block below (`skill` is the phase title, `started` the time of that first write; `gate` is `passed` when the gate ran clean and `skipped` under `--skip-checks`); if it already exists, leave the block alone except to update `finished` and to set `gate` to the worst value among the sections (`skipped` over `passed`).

```yaml
---
skill: Govern
workflow: legal
phase: 4
project: <project>
started: <ISO timestamp>
finished: <ISO timestamp>
agent: <the agent you run in, or "unknown">
gate: <passed|skipped>
---
```

Open your `## Regulatory Updates` section with one italic line, `*<skill name> · <ISO timestamp> · gate: <passed|skipped>*` (your skill name is `legal-regulatory-updates`).

End your section with `### Decisions` and `### Open questions` (one level under your `## Regulatory Updates` heading, so the section stays one block), in this shape:

```markdown
### Decisions
- <what was chosen> — <why> — <what was rejected>

### Open questions
- <what the next phase or a reviewer must settle>
```

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB
  • scripts/gate.sh1.1 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.