Skip to content
Back to skills

Deliver

ASecurity

Validate the top solution and produce actionable recommendations with evidence

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add bromso/metapowers --skill deliver --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Deliver?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Deliver
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bromso-deliver/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bromso-deliver)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
description: Validate the top solution and produce actionable recommendations with evidence
---

# Deliver

Converge on the final recommendation for "$ARGUMENTS". Validate the top solution concept(s) with evidence, refine the approach, and produce actionable recommendations.

## Prerequisites

Read `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/01-discover.md`, `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/02-define.md`, and `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/03-design.md`.

If `03-design.md` does not exist, tell the user:

> Phase 3 (Design) has not been completed for "$ARGUMENTS". Run `/research:design $ARGUMENTS` first, or use `--skip-checks` to bypass.

If `--skip-checks` is present in $ARGUMENTS, skip this check and log to `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/skip-log.md`.

## Process

1. **Read all prior artifacts:**
   - Read `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/01-discover.md` for original research
   - Read `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/02-define.md` for problem statement and success criteria
   - Read `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/03-design.md` for recommended solutions and validation plan

2. **Validate the top solution(s):**
   - Use WebSearch to find evidence supporting or contradicting the recommended approach
   - Use WebFetch to read detailed case studies of similar implementations
   - Look for: success stories, failure modes, edge cases, unintended consequences
   - Test each assumption identified in the Design phase

3. **Assess against success criteria:**
   - Review each success criterion from the Define phase
   - For each criterion, document evidence that the solution meets it (or doesn't)
   - Flag any criteria that can't be validated with desk research alone

4. **Refine recommendations:**
   - Adjust the solution based on validation findings
   - Add implementation considerations discovered during validation
   - Identify quick wins vs. long-term investments
   - Note dependencies and prerequisites

5. **Write the artifact** to `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/04-deliver.md` with sections:
   - **Executive Summary** — one-paragraph recommendation
   - **Validation Findings** — evidence for/against the solution, organized by assumption
   - **Success Criteria Assessment** — each criterion with evidence status
   - **Final Recommendation** — refined solution with implementation approach
   - **Action Items** — prioritized next steps with owners/timelines if applicable
   - **Risks & Mitigations** — remaining risks and how to handle them
   - **Research Journey** — brief timeline of what was discovered across all 4 phases

## Output

The final deliverable written to `.metapowers/research/$ARGUMENTS/04-deliver.md`. Present a summary to the user highlighting:
- The final recommendation (1-2 sentences)
- Confidence level based on evidence strength
- Top 3 action items
- Key risks to watch

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.